CHAPTER THIRTY FIVE

ZIONIST CRIMES AGAINST JEWS

When the Zionist ideology was born, its adherents were a rabble of malcontents, considered maniacs by the majority of Jews. Today the majority of American Jews have been lured and coerced into blindly supporting the Zionist ideology and the State of Israel, but before the Balfour Declaration most American Jews were opposed to Zionism. This opposition to Zionism among American Jews represented majority sentiment until World War II, when the Zionists silenced their opposition by threats anddefamation, intrigue and deceit, and by outright lies creating a false feeling of guilt in American Jews because they had not previously supported the Zionist fallacy.

One of America's greatest Jewish spiritual leaders, Rabbi Samuel Schulman, angered by the pretensions of the Zionists, described the "incompatibility of the Jewish homeland concept with the course of Jewish history" and forecast that "Zionism could bring the recrudescence of anti-Semitism." (1)

Rabbi Schulman's remarks have been validated by history. The spiritual values of American Jews have been trampled underfoot by their irreligious pandering to the abominations committed in the name of Israel. Anti-Semitism, which was on the decline in 1916, was revived through Zionist intrigues to a greater than ever magnitude.

The Balfour Declaration evoked little support from American Jews. The Central Conference of American Rabbis "objected to the supposed unique status the Jews were to have in the Holy Land." (2)

American Jews rightly called Zionism by the pejorative designation of "Ziomania, the momentary inebriation of morbid minds," and a "movement arresting the march of progress and tolerance." (3)

The New York Times, in those days under the fearless ownership of agreat Jewish Americaneditor and anti-Zionist, Adolph Ochs, dared to expose the fact that Palestine was no solution to the Jewish problem. (4) The fallacy of the Zionists' biblical arguments was openly exposed by Jewish theologians. (5) That a Jewish State would in fact be a misfortune for the Jewish people could be openly discussed in mainstream Jewish American publications. (6) The Union of American Hebrew Congregations could openly brand Zionism as a "menace to Jewish unity". (7) Ambassador Henry Morgenthau, the most prominent American Jew in public life, could champion Americanism among Jews as the opposite of Zionism? (8)

But the opposition to nascent Zionist power among American Jews was accompanied by signs of the gangster methods used by the Zionists to silence their opponents: character assassination, lies, deceit and extortion were their criminal instruments then. as now. American Jews of 1918 abhorred the Zionist methods. No one in America had ever tried to silence them before. That the Zionists would ultimately succeed in destroying the practical exercise of free speech among American Jews, and then among American Christians, on any questions relating to Palestine, was thought not possible, just as most Germans considered that the Nazi methods would never succeed. But both the Nazis and the Zionists used the method of the "Big Lie," accompanied by threats and the use of force to destroy their enemies.

The Zionists showed total disregard of the truth, just as they do today. Anti-Zionist American Jews subjected to Zionist calumny and smear tactics attacked the Zionist perversion of truth. (9)

The Jewish Tribune editorialized against the Zionists: "Prove Your Sanity." (10) The Jewish Criterion editorialized against the Zionist goals and methods: "Let Us Nail Our Colors to the Mast." (11) "Shall the Anti-Zionists Be Silent?" asked the New Jewish Chronicle. (12) Thoughtful American Jews could sense that with these Zionist gangsters they were confronted by a different kind of force; people who did not care about rational discourse, people who did not care about objective facts. They learned that well-meaning people who urged a dialogue with the Zionists were asking the impossible, dialogue with brainwashed zealots who rejected the very concept of rational dialogue. Even today, when the Zionists claim to ask for a dialogue, in fact they ask for surrender.

Adolf Hitler. in his Mein Kampf, wrote:

None but members of the Nation may be citizens of the State. None but those of German blood. whatever their creed, may be members of the Nation. No Jew, therefore, may be a member of the Nation. (13)

In Israel today it is openly proclaimed that none but those of Jewish blood may be members of the Nation. No Arab, therefore, may be a member of the Nation.

Apologists for the Nazis excused them as just another political movement. Apologists for the Zionists also excused them as just another political movement. But some American Jews recognized Zionism for what it was, a "menace," (14) and some American Jews saw the real issue: "America or Palestine - Which?" (15) The Zionists targeted those American Jews for destruction, a dress-rehearsal for their present destruction of any American Christian who does not give them 100% unwavering support.

Before coming to power in Germany, the Nazis conducted smear campaigns against their political enemies. Even violence was not excluded. The Zionists' techniques against their Jewish and non-Jewish opponents have always been the same. For that reason the Zionists and Nazis were not strange bed-fellows during the Third Reich. In fact, "the Zionists enjoyed a visibly protected political status in Germany" during the early days of Nazi rule. Goebbels' newspaper even struck a commemorative coin in honor of Nazi-Zionist collusion. "On one side was a swastika. On the other side a Star of David." (16)

In Nazi Germany German Christians and Social Democrats were the first inmates of the Nazi concentration camps. There were also some German Jews in these early Nazi concentration camps, but they were anti-Zionist and anti-Nazi German Jews. The Zionist Jews were the Nazi collaborators against the anti-Zionist German Jews. This perfidy of the Zionists is today hidden or glossed over. No one asks how many Americans of German Jewish origins have relatives who lost their lives and property, not, as the Zionist myth says, because there then was not a Jewish State, but because the Zionists were Hitler's allies.

Documentary evidence shows that the Zionists shared the Nazis' scientifically false and spiritually wrong concept of race. When German Jews were watching their property being [ confiscated and were being subjected to a ban-age of racist Nazi hate propaganda, the Zionist racists were completely in accord with the Nazi goal of racial purity. A secret document sent to the Nazi party by the German central organization of Zionists, Zionistische Vereinigung für Deutschland, on June 21, 1933 applauds the Nazis on the "foundation of the New German State, which has established the principle of race" and declares that "assimilated Jews must feel the determination that they belong to Jewry, to the Jewish race and past." (17)

Most German Jews at the time were assimilated Jews, feeling that they belonged to German culture and nationality. To the Zionists these Jews were the principal enemy, not the Nazis, their fellow racists.

Most American Jews at the time were also assimilated Jews, feeling that they belonged to American culture and nationality. To the Zionists, these American Jews were also the principal enemy, not the American anti-Semites.

The Zionists were, and are, committed to the false belief that the Jews are a race and nation. Religion to them has one primary value and purpose: to support the idea that the Jews are a race and a nation. The Jewish Quarterly Review of April, 1936 punctured the Zionist myths in an article, "The Jews: Race, Nation or Religion — Which?" (18) But the Zionists were adept at misusing the sympathy Jews felt at the fate of their co-religionists. The Zionist takeover of America's Jewish institutions was only possible because for them the worse the fate of non-Zionist Jews, the better for Zionism.

Tribute must be paid to those Jews who tried to prevent Zionism. Theirs was a lonely battle. The Palestinian Arabs sensed the menace of Zionism, but most Christians had not the slightest idea that if the Zionists destroyed the anti-Zionist Jews, the Christians would be the next victims of the Zionists. Today's situation in which, through intrigue, America has been reduced in its Middle East policy to something like a quasi-colony of the Zionist State, could have been prevented.

The strength of organized American Jewry has left a list of patriotic American Senators and Congressmen. Senator J. William Fulbright, Senator Charles Percy, Congressman John Rarick, Congressman "Pete" McCloskey, and Congressman Paul Findley are among others who were silenced or politically destroyed by the Zionists. But the first political victim of the Zionist conspirators in America was a Jewish Republican, Congressman Julius Kahn.

Congressman Julius Kahn of San Francisco was the most prominent Jewish American Member of the U.S. House of Representatives at the time of the Paris Peace Conference following World War I. If some Christian statesmen of the time, such as President Woodrow Wilson, were somewhat beguiled by the Zionists, Congressman Kahn opposed Zionism without ambiguity or reservation. He knew that Zionism was a danger to America, to Judaism, to Palestine, and, indeed, to the whole world. He came out openly in opposition to Zionism. (19)

In March of 1919 Congressman Kahn, supported by Rabbi Henry Berkowitz, founder of the Jewish Chautauqua Society, and Professor Morris Jastrow, Jr. of the University of Pennsylvania, presented a petition opposing Zionism at Versailles and Washington. Two hundred and ninety-nine signatures of prominent American Jews from thirty-one American cities were affixed to the petition. They included Rabbi Henry Cohen of Galveston, Rabbi Isaac Landman of New York, George Oakes-Ochs. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau, David Belasco, and Daniel Frohman, joined together in protest against Zionism. (20)

The main provisions of the Kahn petition were objection to the segregation of the Jews as an alleged national unit; protest against the Zionist reversal of a Jewish historical trend toward emancipation; objection that Zionism annulled minority rights of Jews in the lands of their birth; accused Zionism of creating dangers of hyphenism, dual allegiance, disloyalty and a fostering of anti-Semitism; and objection to Palestine as physically unsuited to be a Jewish homeland.

Congressman Kahn mobilized the majority of American Jews against the Zionist menace. (21) Adolph Ochs in the New York Times publicized American Jewish protests against the Zionist ideology (22) and American Jewish protests against the very idea of a Jewish State. (23)

The New York Times, under Adolph Ochs and Arthur Hays Sulzberger, clearly saw the danger in Zionism. (24) They were not afraid to clearly state why most American Jews did not favor Zionism. (26) The Literary Digest was not afraid to publish "The Case Against Zionism." (26) The American Hebrew could proudly proclaim: "Zionism is Dead! Long Live Judaism." (27) But an evil bacillus is not so easily destroyed. Through character assassination and intrigue the Zionists ultimately captured the New York Times.

Anti-Zionist American Jews were not taken in by the Zionist mythology that Palestine "was a land without a people for a people without a land." They saw the danger to the indigenous Palestinian Arab population whose basic right to the land made it "impossible to give Palestine to the Jews." (28) They saw that the serpentine lies of the Zionists would ultimately lead to the philosophy prevailing among the Zionist rulers of Occupied Palestine today, adequately expressed by Meir Indor, a spokesman for the Gush Emunim settlement of Kiryat Arba:

The Arabs must know that there is a master here, the Jewish people. It rules over Eretz Israel. The Arabs are temporary dwellers who happen to live in the country. There are commandments in the Bible concerning such temporary dwellers and we should act accordingly. (29)

This Nazi-like "herrenvolk" principle was anathema to truly religious American Jews, who believed that "Thou shalt not Kill" and "Thou shalt not Steal" were commandments reflecting the Jewish ideals and that the idea of the Zionist State was "putting false gods before me." On March 28, 19 19, The American Hebrew editorialized "Arabs Oppose Zionism," and threw its support to the indigenous Palestinian Arabs against the Zionist intruders. (30)

Among the most knowledgeable Americans at the time on the subject of the Middle East was Henry Morgenthau, who had been United States Ambassador to Turkey from 1913 to 1918. He was also among the strongest opponents of Zionism among distinguished American Jews. Having observed the machinations of the Zionists at first hand, Morgenthau saw through their scam. He knew that Palestine offered no solution to the problems of European Jewry and that "the real power which would save the oppressed Jews of Eastern Europe lay in American ideals." (31) He saw that Zionism was totally contrary to American ideals, which then, and now, would be best upheld through self-determination for the Palestinian Arabs, and came to the conclusion that

Zionism is the most stupendous fallacy in Jewish history. It is wrong in principle and impossible of realization. It is unsound in its economics, fantastical in its politics and sterile in its spiritual ideals. (32)

Sixty-seven years after penning these words, history has proven the Ambassador's perspicacity. The Zionist state can only persuade Jews to move there through deception, blackmail and force. Its economics are that of a bankrupt depending upon foreign assistance to survive. Its politics are a fantastic mixture of greed, corruption, and tyranny. It is devoid of spiritual ideals, an unholy blight on the Holy Land of mankind's greatest spiritual values.

But just as the Zionists pilloried Congressman Julius Kahn, they vilified Ambassador Morgenthau. They went so far as to force the distinguished Ambassador to resign as President of New York's Free Synagogue. (33) Their instrument was the notorious Rabbi Stephen Wise, a so-called "champion of free-speech" - except for Morgenthau, of course - and long a Zionist king-pin in the United States. It is to their shame that some of Ambassador Morgenthau's descendants have capitulated to the Zionist conspiracy, lending their names to that evil force which so ruthlessly slandered their distinguished progenitor.

The continuous smear campaign against Ambassador Henry Morgenthau had its reaction. The American Hebrew warned: "Zionists! Wake Up!" (34) But they had no chance against the sinister machinations of the Zionists for whom there was no right or wrong, only the insane dream of their ideology. The bogus State of Israel is not a nation, whatever the pretensions of the Zionists. Anti-Zionist American Jews knew this. Adolph Ochs editorialized in The New York Times: "Israel not a Nation." (35) Jewish publications assailed the Zionist intriguers. The Union Bulletin decried "the evils of race nationalism and political Zionism." (36) The New Jewish Chronicle exposed Zionism for what it was, and what it is now, "A Flagrant Fraud." (37)

Anti-Zionist American Jews were aware of the links between Zionism and Communism. Rabbi Harrison proclaimed "opposition to Zionist-inspired Red radicalism." (38) The Denver Jewish News blamed the 1921 Jaffa riots in Palestine on Jewish communists. (39) The American Hebrew urged "Scrap Zionism, Build Palestine." (40)

Despite the Zionists' calumnies against him, Ambassador Morgenthau continued his efforts to alert his fellow Americans, Jews and Christians alike. (41) Assailing Zionism, Morgenthau declared "America is our Zion." (42) He was acclaimed in an editorial in The New York Evening Post as "a Jewish opponent of Zionism." (43) Current Opinion rightly described "Zionism as the Most Stupendous Fallacy in Jewish History." (44) Undeterred, the Zionist conspirators continued their insidious efforts to undermine the fabric of American Jewish life.

Using the same methods of smear and vilification the Nazis were simultaneously using in Germany against their opponents, the Zionists intrigued to get a Congressional Resolution supporting their aims to establish a Jewish National Home in Palestine. Naive Christian politicians, then, as today, knee-jerked before the Zionist spokesmen. But courageous Jews testified against the Resolution.

One who testified was Rabbi Isaac Landman. He reviled the proposed Resolution and totally opposed the establishment of a Jewish State in Palestine. The Zionists called Rabbi Landman a "traitor" and all but called for his assassination. (45) The American Hebrew was shocked, and identified Zionism as "a disease". (46)

The smear campaign against Rabbi Isaac Landman was typical of the display of symptoms of disease among the Zionists. The same could be said of the Nazis. Hitler's biographer, Robert Payne, writes: "Just as Hitler's speeches lack any sense of progression, for he is continually circling around a small, hard core of primitive ideas announced with complete conviction, so in Mein Kampf he disdains any reasoned argument but repeats his ideas ad nauseum, loudly, firmly, unhesitatingly, until the reader becomes deafened. The ideas he expresses are all announced with manic force." (47) This description of Hitler's methods is equally accurate in describing the Zionists' methods. Nazism and Zionism are twinevils. destructive of everything in their path.

Rabbi Landman did not represent a "fringe" element in American Judaism. He represented the then mainstream of American Jewish views. The New York Times editorialized against the same Resolution against which Rabbi Landman testified, calling the Resolution "Confusion Worse Confounded." (48) Observing the successes of the Zionist conspirators in manipulating Christian American officials, the New York Times published an editorial calling Zionism "A Dangerous Movement." (49) The prestigious newspaper's owner, Adolph Ochs, himself wrote an article demolishing the pretenses of Zionism under the title, "The Truth About Palestine." (50) The Modern View unequivocally avowed that the Jewish people are a religious entity and neither a race nor a nation. (51)

Today the most infamous tool of the Zionist conspiracy in America is the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith. But this was not always the case. Founded in 1843, B'nai B'rith was the most important organization among American Jews. In 1917 it established its Anti-Defamation League to combat anti-Semitism and racism in all its forms. Seventy years later the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith is a bastion of anti-Arab propaganda - and thus of anti-Semitism, because the Arabs are true Semites - and a Gestapo-like force supporting Zionist racism. This is ironic, because before it lost its soul to them, B'nai B'rith ardently opposed the Zionists as proponents of racism and inciters of anti-Semitism. Rabbi M.N.R. Cohen, the distinguished editor of the B'nai B'rith Messenger, the official organ of B'nai B'rith, staunchly attacked the Zionists' methods (52), and declared that Palestine belonged not to Jews, but "as much, if not more, to the Arabs." (53)

Although Reformed Jews represent the most influential sector of the Jewish Faith in America, Reformed Jewish marriages and conversion are not recognized as valid in the State of Israel. Despite the insulting and degrading status of Reformed Judaism in the Zionist State, their sham leaders, who are nothing but agents of a foreign conspiracy operating in America, politically and financially support the Zionist war criminals. And to think that once upon a time the "Union of Hebrew Congregations opposed a Jewish State"! (54) Inch by inch the Zionist conspirators took over one organization after another, chased out of public life their opponents, in a no different manner than the Nazis did in Germany.

It is a tradition in Judaism that each life is sacred, and especially that a Jew must not kill. But is the sanctity of life revered in Judaic philosophy adhered to by the Zionists? No: the Palestinians and other Arabs are victims and witnesses of Zionist murders and massacres. And even Jewish life is not spared.

The first Jew to be murdered by the Zionists in Palestine was Professor De Haan. Professor De Haan was strongly anti-Zionist. His prestige infuriated the Zionist conspirators. And so they killed him. On the 16th of May, 1923, Professor De Haan wrote Colonel Kish of the Zionist Executive in Palestine:

I got a letter (in a government envelope) telling me that I shall be killed if I do not leave Palestine before the 24th. I know that the question of whether it is advisable or not to kill me is seriously discussed in the circles which you have the honor to represent.

De Haan was not intimidated by the Zionist threats. He had predicted his assassination by the Zionists several months before. He cherished the fact that he had been dismissed as a lecturer at the Government Law College in Jerusalem in the wake of Zionist hooliganism at his lectures. He cherished the fact that the Dutch newspaper for which he wrote had been pressured by the Zionist extortionists to sever its connection with him. Knowing that he was right to oppose the evil of Zionism, he cherished these misfortunes and did not interrupt his work or vary his daily routine.

On Monday, June 30, 1924 he had completed his arrangements to accompany an Aguda delegation, as legal advisor, to London to present the community's objections to the proposed Communities Ordinance at the Colonial Office. After despatching his last message to the Daily Express (6 p.m.), he made his way to the synagogue in the Sha'arei Sedeq Hospital where he prayed twice daily. When the evening service was over and the worshippers had reached the hospital gates, three shots rang out. De Haan fell to the ground. His devoted friend, Dr. Wallach, the hospital's founder and director, rushed out to attend to him, but his soul had already fled from his blood-stained body.

Typically, some Zionists condemned De Haan, pronouncing the victim instead of his murderers to be insane, but history has vindicated Professor De Haan, not his murderers.

In its Official History, the Haganah, the armed body of the Jewish Executive in Palestine, has confessed to the crime. (55) The order allegedly came from Joseph Hecht, who instructed Zachariah Urieli, the Jerusalem Commander, to have Professor De Haan killed by the smallest possible group. Zionist newspapers have named the assassins as Abraham Krichevski (Giora) and Abraham Silberg ( Tahomi). (56)

The Zionists' murder of Professor De Haan in Palestine was paralleled by the murders by Nazis of their political opponents in Germany. In the early 1920's Zionism had gripped only a small minority of Jews, yet it produced the assassination of Professor De Haan; on August 20, 1921 the small minority of Germans already gripped by Nazism murdered in cold blood Matthias Erzberger, a leader of the German Catholic Center Party. (57)

If American Jews and Christians have been brainwashed by incessant Zionist propaganda to believe that the Zionist State represents the forces of good in this world, with high ethical and moral standards, they need only compare the odious behavior of the Zionist leaders with their Nazi predecessors. Much has been said about the Nazi practice of separating infants from their parents in order to raise them to become a "new race of Germanic Supermen." Surely the Zionists, considering how family-oriented most Jews are, could not be guilty of the same type of crime? But they are.

Shlomo Betar, in his book The Magic Carpet, about the Yemenite Jews flown to the so-called Jewish State, recounts:

It was an experience which shall never be forgotten by those redeemed, but there were things which happened in the immigrant camps in Israel, sinister things, inhuman things, which planted terror in the hearts of scores of parents of young children of a year or two. It was an unknown hand which planned -in a manner which still has not been explainedthe kidnapping of scores of babies. An organized chain worked in the camps and hid in several ways the children of these "prophets of old," of these "wonderful people" - children who were reared by the "men of faith." These families. who overnight had lost children, put their complete trust in the camp officials, its doctors and teams of nurses of the nurseries and hospitals. The evil eyes and hearts of some of these workers has darkened the fate of these families who still wait for the return of these children from the "nurseries" after sixteen or seventeen years. (58)

The evil eyes and hearts of the Zionists saw fit to steal the infant children of Yemenite Jews so that the Ashkenazim "Herrenklub" has children for its childless couples. After all, isn't the mother tongue of the Yemenite Jews Arabic? The Zionists see nothing wrong in stealing the land of Arab Christians and Muslims, so what is wrong with their stealing the infant children of Arab Jews?

Ultimately they would turn the Arab Jews into "peons" and "cannon fodder" for the Israeli war machine, but first the Zionist war criminals had to practice making a holocaust on Yemenite Jewry. The Zionists thought nothing of killing Arab Christian and Muslim clergymen, but surely they would shrink at murdering a Rabbi? But not if the Rabbi was "only" a "dirty Arab Yemenite." Rabbi Schonfeld writes in his book, Genocide in the Holy Land:

The story of Yemenite Jewry's holocaust in the Zionist concentration camps cannot be complete without mention of the martyr Rabbi Yaakov Salim G'rafy, who was murdered by the Zionists on the holy sabbath, which was also the seventh day of Passover, April 9, 1950, may his blood be avenged.


Rabbi Yaakov Salim, as other Yemenite Jews brought to the Zionist State in 1949-50, was placed in an assortment of concentration camps, one of which was called Ein-Shemer. The picture of Ein-Shemer can easily be mistaken for any Nazi concentration camp. The long barracks and the barbed wire were especially reminiscent of those camps.

Week after week, month after month, the Yemenite Jews protested vehemently concerning their spiritual genocide,and that of their children. But for naught. Finally, riots began. The Yemenites refused to enter their barracks and refused to listen to the camp managers.

No one was permitted in these camps, in order to enable the Zionists to eradicate all vestiges of religion in the Yemenites and especially in their children, without interference.

While no Jew who looked religious was permitted in, or even close to, these camps, any and all Zionists were.

As resistance mounted and the Yemenites demanded to be set free, refused to hand over their children to Zionist "educators," fought against those who would take away their daughters to work and army training, and vigorously demanded that they be given complete freedom of worship, the Zionists cracked down. They beat hundreds of the Yemenites so severely that many needed hospitalization. The Zionists arrested many hundreds of Yemenites and incarcerated them for long periods in jails.

On Passover of 1950, the Jews in the camps were shown what they would get if they did not adhere to Zionist policies. The Zionists began taking their children against the will of the Jews. All havoc broke loose when it dawned upon the Yemenites that more of their children would be lost to them. When protests mounted the Zionists began the usual beatings and arrests which culminated in shootings to scare the Yemenite Jews not to resist.

It was then that Rabbi Yaakov Salim G'rafy was murdered in cold blood by Zionist bullets shot in his body.

Blood flowing from the forehead of this noble man minutes before being shot to death is a scene defying description. It cries out to us, as the blood of the Prophet Zechariah who was killed by the hoodlums of yesteryear. (59)

Every Christian and Muslim Palestinian Arab can understand the martyrdom of this Arab Jewish Rabbi at the hands of the Zionist hoodlums. But the naive Jews and Christians who send money to his murderers, who prop up the evil Zionist regime, overlook the Zionist crimes against humanity. Naive Jews and Christians overlooked the crimes of the Nazi hoodlums until it was too late, and the Second World War came upon us.

The Yemenite Jews were not the first Arab Jews to be persecuted by the Zionists. No less a Zionist figure than Chaim Weizmann, first president of the State of Israel, was the first persecutor of Palestinian Jews. Despite the overwhelming opposition of the Sephardic Arab Jews in Palestine and also of the anti-Zionist Ashkenazic Torah Jews, the ruthless clique of criminal Zionist conspirators destroyed true Jewish Palestinian institutions.According to Pinchas Eliyahu in his article, "The Holy Land Struggle":

In the Jewish community, the Zionists campaigned to seize control over the various communal institutions. During World War I, Chaim Weizmann arrived in Palestine with a shipload of food donations from abroad for the famine-stricken families of Jerusalem. He refused to distribute any of this food to the hungry Jews until they would capitalize to his demands to secularize, and thus Zionize, the curricula of the religious schools. This they steadfastly refused to do, and as aresult many died of hunger. A few institutionsdid capitulate, and they remained secularized and under Zionist domination to this very day. (60)

The entire Zionist establishment was an accomplice of the Nazi war criminals in the destruction of European Jewry. Were the Zionists reluctant co-conspirators with the Nazis? Let them speak for themselves. Rabbi Joachim Prinz, later President of the American Jewish Congress, wrote:

The German Government announced very solemnly that there was no country in the world which tried to solve the Jewish problem as seriously as did Germany. Solution of the Jewish question? It was our Zionist dream! We never denied the existence of the Jewish question! Dissimilation? It was our own appeal! (61)

The Zionist and Nazi solutions to the "Jewish Question," supposedly opposites, were actually one and the same. The "economic and moral dust" of non-Zionist Jews, those who could not be dissimilated in the shared Nazi and Zionist nightmares, were to be disposed of in concentration camps!

If one should doubt that the community of interests against non-Zionist Jews was mutually shared by the Nazi and Zionist war criminals, the words of the notorious "hangman" Reinhardt Heydrich, thenchief of the SS Security Service and later the infamous Protector of Bohemia-Moravia, in an article, "The Visible Enemy," published in May, 1935 in Das Schwarze Korps, the official organ of the SS, speak for themselves:

We must separate Jewry into two categories, the Zionists and those who favor being assimilated. The Zionists adhere to a strict racial position and by emigrating to Palestine they are helping to build their own Jewish State. Our good wishes together with our official good will go with them. (62)

The mutual admiration society between the Nazis and the Zionists is not at all strange when one considers that they both suffer from the same pathology. A rejection of morality, of concepts of right and wrong, of rational discourse, underlies their creeds. No less a figure than Adolf Eichmann, collaborator of the Zionists in implementing the Nazi "Final Solution" for the non-Zionist Jews, stated:

I often said to Jews with whom I had dealings that, had I been a Jew, I would have been a fanaticalZionist. I could not imagine being anything else. In fact, I would have been the most ardent Zionist imaginable. (63)

With the defeat of their erstwhile Nazi colleagues, the Zionists created a mythology that the Jews who lost their lives at the hands of the Nazis would have survived if there had been a Jewish State in existence at the time, and if Palestine had been open to unrestricted entry by Jews. This myth has been used to destroy the remnants of Jewish opposition to Zionism, and to shame Christians into subservience to the Zionist conspirators.

In fact, the Jewish Agency held back thirty thousand immigration certificates to Palestine for use after World War 11. At the height of Nazi persecution of the Jews during the war, the Zionists did not use certificates to save 30,000 Jewish lives, solely because they knew that their users would only be using them for transit, not to become colonists in Palestine.

This explosive secret of the Zionists is a scandal of massive proportions. Dependent upon gullible, brainwashed American Jews, the Zionist State cannot afford to let them know that at least 30,000 of the American Jews' relatives could have been rescued except for the Zionist obsession to use those certificates for people who could help them wrest Palestine from its rightful indigenous inhabitants. The Zionists would not "waste" them on non-Zionist Jews.

Palestinian Jew Yitshaq Ben-Ami directly learned from Arieh Ben-Eliezer about the super-secret 30,000 certificates:

Ben-Eliezer expressed his shock to have learned from Mr. Knox, the Acting Secretary of the British administration in Palestine, that thirty thousand immigration certificates had not been used. Knox told him: "The Jewish Agency leaders said they knew about them but advised the administration that they were holding them back for use after the war." (64)

Of course, the Zionists could say in their defense that there was no way to get the Jews out of Nazi-occupied Europe to use these visas for transit to safety - and life. That is not true. There were many opportunities to rescue Jews, but the Zionists' goal was not to save Jewish blood; it was to steal Palestinian land.

Proof lies in the answer the Zionists sent to Rabbi Michael Dov-Ber Weissmandel of Bratislava, Slovakia. In response to his request for amere pittance to save two million Jews living under Nazi rule, the Zionists refused, stating "for only with blood shall we get land." (65)

The Zionists did send Rabbi Weissmandel money "to save 19 or 20 close friends, to get out of Slovakia and save your lives and with the blood of the remainder - the blood of all the men, women, old and young and sucklings - the land will belong to us." (66)

Rabbi Weissmandel sincerely wanted to save as many Jews as possible. He learned that turning to the Zionists for help was futile: Land meant more than people. After all, as Yitshak Gruenbaum, head of the Jewish Agency in Palestine, was quoted as saying, "One Jewish cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland." (67)

Interestingly, Yitzhak Gruenbaum's son, Eliezer, was a notorious collaborator with the Nazis in Auschwitz. "Eliezer Gruenbaum who, thanks to his tactics of acting as informant and displaying cruelty -to an extent which amazed even the Gestapo - was elevated to the rank of bloc commander." (68)

It is no wonder that Rabbi Weissmandel cried out in anguish in his letter to the Zionist representatives on May 15, 1944:

And you, our brothers in Palestine, in all the countries of freedom, and you, ministers of all the Kingdom, how do you keep silent in the face of this greater murder? Silent while thousands on thousands of Jews were murdered. And silent now while tens of thousands are still being murdered and waiting to be murdered? Their destroyed hearts cry out to you for help as they bewail your cruelty. Brutal you are and murderers too you are, because of the cold-bloodedness of the silence in which you watch. Because you sit with folded arms and you do nothing, although you could stop or delay the murder of Jews at this very hour. You, our brothers, sons of Israel, are you insane? Don't you know the hell around us? For whom are you saving your money? Murderers. Madmen. Who is it that gives charity? You who toss a few pennies from your safe homes? Or we who give our blood in the depths of hell? (69)

Yes, the Zionists were insane, and the dementia was, and is, the madness called Zionism. The disease turned them into murderers, accomplices of the Nazis in murdering Jews, and imitators of the Nazis in murdering Palestinians.

Was Rabbi Weissmandel a lone voice shouting, "Shame?" No, a legion of Jewish ghosts cry out against the Zionists. Every Jewish dollar sent to Israel today. every political action taken on behalf of the Zionists today, is only providing succor to these mass murderers of the Jews. Their Nazi partners in crime, to a large part have received their punishment. But for the Zionists the day of reckoning has not yet come. But it will.

The former Chairman of the Zionist Organization in Hungary, Dr. Rudolf Kastner, was one of these Zionist criminals, willingly sacrificing the lives of non-Zionist Jews to save the Zionist remnant within Hungarian Jewry.

Even an Israeli court, despite the refusal of Zionism's top leaders to testify, could not hide that "Kastner's contacts with the SS in Budapest had in fact amounted to collaboration." (70) Nazi butcher Adolf Eichmann testified:

Dr. Kastner's main concern was to make it possible for a select group of Hungarian Jews to emigrate to Israel. There was a very strong similarity between our attitudes in the SS and the viewpoint of these immensely idealistic Zionist leaders.

I believe that Kastner would have sacrificed a thousand or a hundred thousand of his blood to achieve his political goal. He was not interested in old Jews or those who had become assimilated into Hungarian society. But he was incredibly persistent in trying to save biologically valuable Jewish blood, that is, human material that was capable of reproduction and hard work. "You can have the others," he would say, "but let me have this group here." And because Kastner rendered us a great service by helping keep the deportation camps peaceful, I would let his groups escape. After all, I was not concerned with small groups of a thousand or so Jews. (71)

Old Jews? Assimilated Jews? What use were they for the planned rape of Palestine? Their deaths could be used to extort support from surviving Jews and the Christian world to help fulfill the Zionist plans for Palestine. Kastner's libel trial in the Zionist State could not prevent the airing of the dirty facts of Zionist collusion with the Nazis. But the facts about Zionist collaboration with the Nazis could jeopardize world-wide support for Zionism. The Zionist war criminals, of whom Kastner was one, sacrificed thousands of Jewish lives on the altar of Zionism. So why not sacrifice Kastner's life, too, to conceal the horrible secret?

On March 3, 1957 Kastner was gunned down. Zeev Eckstein was convicted of the assassination, and Joseph Menkes and Dan Shemer were found guilty of being accessories on the basis of a confession by Eckstein. The assassin claimed that he was a government agent who had infiltrated a rightwing terrorist group. (72)

So the Zionist Rudolf Kastner, accomplice to the murder of hundreds of thousands of Hungarian Jews on behalf of his fellow Zionists, himself was murdered by his Zionist colleagues, to hide their common crime.

An interesting revelation of the Kastner libel case was that Kastner had intervened to save SS General Kurt Becher, a Nazi war criminal, from being tried for war crimes. Becher had been one of the leading Nazi negotiators with the Zionists in 1944. Kastner perjured himself: "There can be no doubt about it that Becher belongs to the very few SS leaders having the courage to oppose the programme of annihilation of the Jews. Imake this statement not only in my own name but also in behalf of the Jewish Agency and the Jewish World Congress. Signed, Dr. Rudolf Kastner ...." (73)

Kastner had saved SS-Standartenfuhrer Kurt Becher, Himmler's special representative in Budapest, from the gallows at Nuremberg through his accommodating testimony. Becher knew that Kastner would have to cover up for him or his role in the slaughter of the Hungarian Jews would be disclosed. It would have come to light then how Kastner had continuously persuaded masses of Jews to go quietly to the "work" camp at Auschwitz. Kastner was fully aware of the fate that awaited them there; he also knew that many Hungarian Jews could have saved themselves by going underground or by fleeing to Rumania if he had warned them. (74)

Becher had also been guilty of enormous confiscations and extortions of funds from Jews, He had put those sums into a Swiss bank before the end of the war. Once he was free, thanks to Kastner's perjury, he withdrew them and started a grain business in Cologne in 1950. The business grew rapidly, and SS-Standartenfuhrer Becher became one of the richest men in Germany. (75)

So, the Nazi SS General Kurt Becher, who robbed and extorted funds from thousands of Jews, made more loot by selling wheat to the Zionists, no doubt paid for with the loot robbed from the Palestinian Arab rightful owners of Palestine. This war crime against Jews, acting in collusion with the Nazis in their murder, should alienate Jews from the Zionist monstrosity. But so well has the "Big Lie" of Zionismworked on American Jews, that even the Zionist Rabbi Alexander Schindler has had to admit that American Jews are "plugged into Israel as if it were a kidney machine, a scientific marvel that keeps them Jewishly alive. For many American Jews the state has become the synagogue and its prime minister their rabbi." (76)

The mythology that "Jews don't kill Jews" is so pervasive that even Zionist dissidents have fallen victim to their own lie. At the time when the Irgun ship, the Altalena, was at anchor off the Palestinian shore. Arch-terrorist Menahem Begin, Commander of the Irgun, was warned by a Palestinian Arab Jew, Gershon Hakim, that the Zionist establishment would fire on the ship: "But Commander, they will shoot at us," said Gershon. Begin looked at him as if in disbelief and answered, "Jews don't kill Jews." (77) But the Zionist establishment did kill Jews, and Menahem Begin, the war criminal of Deir Yassin and Sabra and Shatila as well as the King David Hotel and numerous other atrocities, led sixteen of his own men on the Altalena to slaughter by the Zionist establishment. But Begin could rejoin forces with the other Zionists who had killed his own men and join with these other Polish and Russian gangsters to steal Palestine from the Muslim, Christian and Jewish Palestinians.

Of course, extremist "Nationalist Jews," such as Begin, who never grew out of playing "Betar Jugend," the Zionist equivalent of the "Hitler Jugend" in pre-war Poland, had among them glorifiers of Hitler. Jewish editor Meyer W. Weisgal wrote in 1933: "One of the strangest phenomena in the whole German situation is that of the so-called Nationalist Jews. They are the Jewish followers of Adolf Hitler. This group publishes a paper which glorifies Hitler."78 This fact was confirmed by David Ben-Gurion during a debate in the Zionist Knesset, when he shouted at Menahem Begin and said: "I was not a partner of Herut's when they praised, extolled and raised up the name of Hitler, set him up as a model for the conduct of a national movement, and included Hitler among the outstanding names of the era." (79) Ben- Gurion was right in his criticism of Begin, but as evidence proves, Ben-Gurion and his clique of Zionists were also guilty of being Hitler's accomplices.

The Nazis also killed Nazis. After coming to power in Germany, Hitler organized his own "blood purge" of the SA (Sturmabteilung), killing its leader Emst Roehm and other Nazis, such as Party leader Gregor Strasser, whom Hitler felt could become dissident deviationists.

The Zionist dissidents could kill their own, too. Yitshak Ysemitzky, alias Yitshak Shamir, was one of the three top leaders of LHI, the notorious Stem Gang of brutal, bloodthirsty killers in Palestine. Ysernitzky himself murdered LHI's head in Tel Aviv, Eliyahu Giladi, in cold blood. (80) The reasons for the murder remain obscure, despite the efforts of Giladi's widow to secure justice.

Perhaps Giladi, an Arab Jew, found out that the Polish and Russian invaders of Palestine were racists against Arab Jews as well as against Arab Christians and Muslims. In any case, Ysemitzky, alias Shamir, the plotter of the murders of Lord Moyne and Count Bernadette, and of countless British soldiers and civilians and of Jews and Arabs in Palestine, went to work for Israeli Intelligence as a career civil servant until he finally surfaced in politics as a member of the Knesset. Today this gangster is Prime Minister of the gangster State of Israel.

Yitshak Shamir and his fellow terrorists could seek a military alliance with the Nazis in the past, for as we have seen, Nazism and Zionism are blood brothers. Did Shamir- Ysemitzky personally know of his movement's proposed confederation with Adolf Hitler? In recent years the wartime activity of the Stem Gang has been thoroughly researched by one of the youths who joined it in the post-war period, when it was no longer pro-Nazi. In an interview on February 17, 1981, Baruch Nadel stated he is absolutely certain that Ysernitzky- Shmir was fully aware of Stem's plan: "They all knew about it." (81)

Giladi's death at the hands of Shamir was only an omen of the fate of Arab Jews under the Zionist racists. All of the leaders of Zionism were racists against anything Arabic - Jewish or not.

David Ben-Gurion said of the Arab Jews: "Those Jews from Morocco had no education. Their customs are those of Arabs. The culture of Morocco I would not like to have here. We do not want Israelis to become Arabs. We are in duty bound to fight against the spirit of the Levant, which corrupts individuals and societies, and preserve the authentic Jewish values as they crystallized in the diaspora." (82) This Polish Jewish arch-corrupter and arch-war criminal did not hide his Nazi-style Zionist hatred for the "inferior" Arabs. Golda Meir, Zionist Ambassador to Moscow and later Prime Minister of the Zionist State, showed her racist arrogance toward Arab Jews: "We have immigrants from Morocco, Libya, Egypt and other countries. Shall we be able to elevate these immigrants to a suitable level of civilizatiorn?" (83) The Zionists could only succeed in reducing the level of the Arab Jews, with their proud traditions, to the level of Zionist gangsterism - using them as cannon fodder for the Zionist war machine.

Even Abba Eban, the Oxford-educated South African Zionist and former Minister of Foreign Affairs displays clear bias against Arab Jews and the entire Arab world: "One of the great apprehensions which afflict us when we contemplate our cultural scene is the danger lest the predominance of immigrants of Oriental origin force Israel to equalize its cultural level with that of the neighboring world." (84)

Only a miniscule part of the Arab Jews supported Zionism. The Zionists have created a mythology that they rescued the Arab Jews who were begging to be returned to Israel. This is as much a lie as any other in the Zionist litany of lies. In fact, the Arab Jewish communities were ancient, and they made many contributions to Arabculture, of which they were apart. The liturgy of Yom Kippur contains beautiful words of the great Arab Jewish liturgist and poet, Ibn Gabirol. In fact, Ibn Gabirol wrote the liturgy in Arabic, not in Hebrew. Maimonides, for whom many Jewish hospitals around the world are named, was a great Arab scholar and Kadi and personal physician to the chivalrous Saladin, who liberated Palestine from the Crusaders.

Many Arab Jews were in fact tricked into immigrating to the Zionist State. The Zionists used the same criminal methods - lies and threats, force and murder - to frighten the Arab Jews into leaving their homes in Iraq and other Arab countries that the Zionists had used to expel the Palestinian Arab Christians and Muslims from their homes.

On the small island of Djerba, off the coast of Tunisia, there was a Jewish colony whose communities dated back at least to the tenth century B.C., and possibly back to the time of King David. These devoutly religious people were tricked by Zionist lies into immigrating to the Zionist State. According to Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld, "Some Djerban rabbis who were not to be fooled nor intimidated by the Zionists were harassed, threatened and even beaten." (85)

In Iraq the Zionists even committed murder as a part of their campaign to fraudulently induce Iraq's ancient Jewish community to leave. According to Rabbi Schonfeld:

On the last day of Passover, 1950, a number of young Jewish intellectuals were sitting inside the Dar el-Bidah cafe in Bagdad. Suddenly a small object was thrown from a passing car and exploded on the pavement. By chance no one was hurt, but the explosion echoed throughout Iraq. Not knowing that the Zionists had thrown the bomb, some of Iraq's Jews applied to emigrate to so-called Israel.

When the first scare had passed, it was evident that not every Iraqi Jew wanted to leave. Suddenly, a second bomb exploded - at the US Information Center. Not knowing that the Zionists had planted the bomb, more Iraqi Jews applied for immigration.

In January 1951 a third bomb exploded, at the Massaude Shemtov Synagogue. Outside of the Synagogue a Jewish boy was selling cakes to passers-by. When the Zionist-planted bomb exploded, this innocent youth was instantly killed. Not knowing at the time that the murderers of this young Jewish boy were Zionists, Iraq's Jewish community panicked and most of them left for so-called Israel.

The Iraqi police caught the culprits. The prosecutor charged that they were members of the Zionist underground and that it was they who threw the three mysterious bombs. They were convicted, and objectively speaking, the trial was conducted according to international law. (86)

The Iraqi Court's Judgement of Israeli responsibility for the three bombs has been confirmed by independent sources.

In his book on the Middle East, Wilbur Crane Eveland, a former CIA operative, wrote that three months before he arrived in Iraq in 1950, a bomb had exploded "outside a Passover gathering," which led 10,000 Iraqi Jews to emigrate to Israel.

"Just after I arrived in Baghdad," wrote Eveland, "an Israeli citizen had been recognized in the city's largest department store: his interrogation led to the discovery of fifteen arms chaches brought into Iraq by an underground Zionist movement. In attempts to portray the Iraqis as anti-American and to terrorize the Jews, the Zionists planted bombs in the U.S. Information Service Library and in synagogues. Soon leaflets began to appear urging Jews to flee to Israel ....

"Although the Iraqi police later provided our embassy with evidence to show that the synagogue and library bombings, as well as the anti-Jewish and anti-American leaflet campaigns, had been the work of an underground Zionist organization, most of the world believed reports that Arab terrorism had motivated the flight of the Iraqi Jews whom the Zionists had 'rescued' really just in order to increase Israel's population." (87)

This independent corroboration of Zionist guilt by a U.S. official should dispel once and for all the "Big Lie" of the Zionist propaganda apparatus about the fate of the Iraqi Jews.

In fact a most ancient Arab Jewish community in Iraq was fraudulently lured to the Zionist State through threats and murder. The Zionists wantonly and deliberately destroyed the spiritual, moral and social fabric of Iraq's Jews, reducing these proud people to quasi-slave labor status in Occupied Palestine and as sepoys in the classically colonialist type armed forces of the Zionist state.

Perhaps most tragic in the fate of the Arab Jews, who comprise the majority of the Jewish population in the Zionist State today, is that deprived of any economic or political power except for a sprinkling "tokenism," they have been inculcated with the Zionist indoctrination of hate against their fellow Arabs. Due to the corrupt, undemocratic Zionist mafia-type system, the Arab Jews are led to take out their resentments on the even more unfortunate Palestinian Arab Christians and Muslims.

Occasionally the resentments of the Arab Jews in Israel boil over against the ruling Ashkenazim. These oppressors of the Sephardic Jews fool the naive American Jews and Christians with their false propaganda that "Israel is an ideal democracy ."

A most serious race riot broke out in the summer of 1959 in the slum district of the port city of Haifa. The battle between "black Jews" from Arab countries and "white Jews" from Europe lasted four days, resulting in eleven Israeli policemen wounded, thirty-two rioters arrested, and considerable property damage. While Arabs in Tel Aviv in 1961 were demonstrating against the government, 400 Yemeni Jews paraded through the streets wearing black armbands to protest discrimination they contend is practised against them by the lighter skinned Jews of the country, according to a far-back page, small/Vew YorkTimes item. Thousands of Christian and Jewish Americans visiting Israel rarely bother to go beyond the conducted tour, or they turn a blind eye to what has been going on in Israel's intercommunal and interracial relationships. How could they dare ever question anything about the land of milk and honey? (88)

The level of conflict between Sephardim and Ashkenazim again reached an explosive point in December 1982. Because a Yemenite Jew in a Jerusalem slum added a room to his two-room house without a government permit, the police came with a bulldozer to demolish it as "land robbery."

Members of the family explained that the court had issued a restraining order, and one of them had gone to get it. Nevertheless, the policeused the bulldozer to wreck the room. When the family threw stones at them a policeman shot and killed one of the sons.

Rioting broke out in the Sephardic slum. Sephardim painted swastikas on the homes and cars of Ashkenazic Jews; they also painted signs that said, "Ashke-Nazis," "Ashkenazim to Auschwitz, Treblinka, and Dachau," "End the Oppression," and "Free the Prisoners of the Neighborhoods." (89)

Lest one think that the Arab Jews are the only Jewish victims of the Zionists in Israel, the persecution of truly religious Ashkenazi Jews of the Neturei Karta movement is shocking.

Following is an outcry by these devout Jews who are persecuted by the Zionists with the utmost sadism:

AN OUTCRY BY AMERICAN NETUREI KARTA

1. We cry out against the sadism of the Zionists (State of Israel).

2. The true authentic Jewish people and the State of Israel are not identical but are extreme opposites.

3. The Zionists are the greatest enemies of the Jewish people.

4. The Zionists torture the living and are digging up our beloved deceased sages, a flagrant violation of Jewish law and tradition.

5. We cry out against the sadistic acts that the Zionists have committed and are committing against other nations. The true authentic Jewish nation was always against this and alwayscondemnedevery cruelty of theZionists towards other peoples.

6. The Zionists assumed the leadership and took the name of "Israel" from the Jews. No one has ever elected them or given them permission to speak in the name of the Jews or to call themselves "Israel."

7. The Zionists are perpetrating their cruel acts in the name of the Jewish nation.

8. The true authentic Jewish nation lives in peace and harmony with every nation and condemns every cruel act of the Zionists.

9. The Zionists control the news media and do not permit the outcry of the true authentic Jewish people to be heard.

10. We beg the world to see and understand the truth! By persecution at the hands of the Zionists, Jews have suffered at their hands ever since the creation of the Zionist state and prior thereto.

By false impression the Zionists create in the world, that Jews and Zionists are the same. Therefore the Jewish people are held responsible for everything the Zionists do and say; for the international political problems that the Zionists create; and for the insults the Zionists hurl at heads of govemments and entiren ations. All of thiscreates anti-semitism. The Zionists also intentionally instigate anti-semitism by both secret and open means, in order to frighten Jews into fleeing to the Zionist state.

Therefore we cry out that Jews and Zionists are opposed to each other!

Authentic Jews do not have anything to do with "Israel"!

We ask every just and decent person, please recognize the truth -Take note:

1. How the Zionists brutally desecrate that which we hold sacred,

2. How the Zionists shed the blood of elderly people, women and children (as seen on US. T.V.),

3. Hear the outcry of authentic Jewry, that it has nothing to do with the Zionist state,

4. Do not hold the Jewish people responsible for the deeds and words of the Zionists,

5. Don't recognize the Zionists as spokesmen or representatives of the Jewish people. (90)

That the Zionists share the Nazis' contempt for the right of freedom of speech is shown in their treatment of truly religious Jews, even forcibly preventing a Rabbi from attending a United Nations hearing in 1976. The Israeli Government refused to

permit Rabbi Moshe Hirsch, leader of the militant anti-Zionist Neturei Karta, to come to New York and make known his group's views favoring establishment of a Palestinian state. Although possessing an American passport, the Rabbi, who considered himself and his followers to beL'Palestinian Jews," was apprehended by Israeli police as he attempted to board a plane at Lydda Airport. (Not a line about this shocking incident appeared in the U.S. press, although it was reported by Reuters and detailed at a well-covered U.N. press conference.) (91)

The Zionists also showed in their treatment of Rabbi Hirsch, a U.S. citizen, a total contempt for their alleged "strategic ally," the United States.

The Zionists have not hesitated to break up peaceful demonstrations of the Neturei Karta with acts of violence. They have not hesitated to throw truly religious Jewish Rabbis into dungeons. One example was the late Rabbi Amrarn Blau, a staunch opponent of the Zionists. In his obituary, "Champion of Truth," Rabbi Blau's story was recounted:

Rabbi Blau's bravery, physical as well as moral, was widely recognized. Zionism's triumph had failed to intimidate him; neither the brutality of its henchmen nor the squalor of its dungeons scared him from taking his place in the forefront of demonstrations; and he suffered blows without pride or rancour, sustained by his knowledge of the metaphysical grounds underlying them. (92)

The Zionists failed to silence such men of great faith as Rabbi Blau, but through lies and deceit they have coerced Jews all over the world to share in the war crime of persecution of religion, including Judaism as well as Christianity and Islam. The Zionists have profaned the fundamental tenets and practices of Judaism, and tricked naive Jews outside of the Zionist State to finance this desecration, making them accomplices in the profanations and abominations intrinsic to Zionism.

For example, autopsies are strictly forbidden in Judaic Law. Yet Israel flagrantly practices autopsies, as explained in The Jewish Guardian:

Flagrant violations of Jewish Law are the most vile practices of autopsies, not tolerated in any civilized country - seriously ill persons are refused admission to hospitals in Israel unless consent is given for an autopsy should the person die. Israeli doctors refuse to sign death certificates and thus delay burial demanded by Jewish Law until consent for autopsy is given. Fraudulent practices are openly admitted by pathologists to obtain autopsies and the disposal of the remains of autopsies as garbage. Body parts have actually been found in garbage cans in hospital yards. The so-called State of Israel is the only country which boasts of an 80% incidence of autopsies. There have been dozens of massdemonstrations in the United States of America, Great Britain and elsewhere against these vile practices, but to no avail.

Also, the first heart transplantation operation where the heart of the donor had been removed for the transplantation while the donor was still alive took place in the State of Israel. Whether by Jewish Law, or any other Laws, this was coldblooded murder. The Zionist Minister of Health admitted that the heart had been removed from the donor while he was still alive. (93)

The same Jewish Americans who donate to the excellent array of Jewish hospitals in the United States, who would never tolerate such abominations in those hospitals, give their money to the Jewish State, making them accessories to the same profanation they would never tolerate at home.

Innocent Jewish tourists are even led unknowingly into "unclean" practices. Jewish Law demands strict adherence to rules preventing desecration of the dead, whether Jewish or non-Jewish dead, but every Jewish tourist who stays at the Tel Aviv Hilton is made "unclean" by trampling on the graves of the dead, for the Zionists built this hotel "on what was the Abed al-Nabi Moslem Cemetery." (94)

Dr. Hannah Arendt, afamous Jewish political philosopher, stated in her book, Eichmann in Jerusalem(l963) that "Whatever Eichmann did, he did not do it because he was a confirmed Nazi or a hater of Jews. but because he was a firm believer in Zionism and that the Jews themselves contributed signally to their own destruction."

"The whole truth was," she wrote, "that there existed Jewish community organizations and Jewish party and welfare associations on both the local and international level. Wherever Jews lived, there were recognized Jewish leaders, and these leaders, almost without exception, cooperated in one way or another with the Nazis."

She found a parallel between Eichmann's dream of a "Devil's Island for Jews" somewhere in Nazi Europe, and Herzl's vision of a Jewish state. The Nazi scheme to concentrate all European Jews in one place she labeled "Zionist." Dr. Arendt contended that two of the most notorious Nazi murderers of Jews, Reinhard Heydrich, gauleiter of Czechoslovakia, and Hans Frank, governor-general of Poland, were of Jewish origin.

The Zionist propaganda machine keeps reminding the Gentiles of their responsibility for the extermination of millions of Jews and suppresses the truth which was published in several Jewish periodicals that Hitler was of Jewish background. The Jewish Transcript of Seattle, Washington, in its issue of July 21, 1933, published an editorial under the title, "Co-Religionist Hitler," in which it stated: "Jews can hardly be happy to have proof accumulating that Adolf Hitler, archenemy of the Jewish people, and reincarnation of Rorquemada, is one of our flesh and blood. There is something appalling in the thought that this man, who has caused despair and destruction to countless thousands of Jews, stems from the very people whom he is seeking to exterminate .... Whatever may be the outcome of this revelation of Hitler's Jewish ancestry, there is cause for self-pity in the knowledge that out of the Jewish people there can spring so violent a repudiation of all that Jewish history has meant." [Editor's note: From a brief check it would seem that current historic studies tend to disagree with the claim, that Hitler had jewish ancestors. Tom Voltz, 2006]

The Zionist war crimes against the Jews were the precursor of Zionist war crimes against the Palestinian Arab Christians and Moslems, and these Zionist war crimes against the Jews continue until this day. The destruction of Jewish institutions and the character assassination of anti-Zionist Jewish spokesmen was the precursor of the current destruction of Christian institutions and the character assassination of Christian anti- Zionist spokesmen.

The Nazis first destroyed their German opponents, then the non-Germans. The Zionists first destroyed their Jewish opponents, then their non-Jewish opponents.

The New York Times editorial of May 7, 1922 has been proved correct in its prediction that "the question of Zionism would intensify the schism among the Jews of the world between those who regard Judaism as a religion and those who would establish the Jews as a nation." (95)

Arthur Hays Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Times, has been proved correct in the analysis of the Zionists' gangster methods which he made in 1946:

I dislike the coercive methods of Zionists who, in this country, have not hesitated to use economic means to silence persons who have different views. I object to the attempts at character assassination of those who do not agree with them. (96)

It must be also objectively concluded that the Zionist war criminals were accomplices of the Nazi war criminals, sharing the same fundamental ideology as evidenced in the Zionist official memorandum submitted to the Nazi government on June 21, 1933, and which was sent directly to Hitler:

"Racial background, religion, a common fate and tribal consciousness must be of decisive importance in developing a lifestyle for Jews." (97) Therefore, "when the Nuremberg Laws in late 1935 stripped German Jewry of their citizenship, it became illegal for Jews to raise the German flag; the same law, however, stipulated that German Jewry could raise the Star of David-emblazoned Zionist flag." )98)

The Magazine Commonweal has been proved correct in its March 12, 1937 assessment that "The Jews are the victims of Zionist injustice." (99)

Nothing better proves this than the attitude of the Zionists towards Judaism. Dr. Zerah Warhaftig, former Minister of Religion, Member of the Knesset and signer of the bogus "Israeli Declaration of Independence" states without equivocation that "Ben-Gurion hated the religion." (100)

David Ben-Gurion was the "founding father" of the illegitimate Jewish State of Israel. Like father, like son, the Zionist war crimes against Jews were the first step toward the Zionist war crimes against Christians and Muslims.

The Zionist war crimes against the Jews prove the truth in the contention of truly religious Jews that

The Zionist State is a great misfortune for the Jewish people. Far from being a cause for celebration, the birth of the Zionist State is to be deplored, a state which is known to be conceived in atheism, based on materialism, nurtured by anti-semitism, led by Marxism, ruled by chauvinism and trusting in militarism.

The collaboration of Zionism with Nazism is an indelible stain. The perpetration of war crimes against the Palestinian people is an everlasting blot. But one can share with truly religious Jews the conviction that "the fraud of Zionism will pass and the Jewish people will live." (101)

NOTES TO CHAPTER THIRTY FIVE

1. Samuel Schulman, "Why American Jews Consider Zionism Undesirable," Outlook, January 5, 1916, pp. 40-42.

2. "We Owe this to the Memory of the Late Rabbi Levy," editorial in The Jewish Criterion (Pittsburgh, Pa.), November 16, 1917, p. 8.

3. "Editorial," American Jewish World (Minneapolis, Minn.), July 5, 1918, p. 736.

4. Henry Moskowitz, "Palestine Not a Solution of Jewish Problem," New York Times, June 10, 1917, pp. 10-1 1.

5. "Zionism and Bible Exegesis," editorial in The American Jewish World, December 28, 1917, p. 288.

6. "A Jewish State Would Be a Misfortune for Israel," editorial in The American Jewish World, July 19, 1918, p. 769.

7. 'The Union of American Hebrew Congregations and Zionism," Jewish Comment February 9, 1917, p. 178.

8. Henry Morgenthau, "Palestine and the American Jews," The American Hebrew (New York, N.Y.), December 14, 1971, p. 178.

9. "Why Pervert the Truth?," editorial in The Jewish Tribune (Portland, Ore.), September 28, 19 17, p. 4.

10. "Prove Your Sanity," editorial in The Jewish Tribune, September 28, 1917, p. 4.

1 1. "Let Us Nail Our Colors to the Mast," editorial in The Jewish Criterion, August 26, 1918, p. 10.

12. "Shall the Anti-Zionists Be Silent?", The New Jewish Chronicle, November, 191 8, p. 17.

13. Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (London: 1939), volume I. p. 273.

14. "The Program of Zionism as a Menace to Jewish Unity," Current Opinion, February 19 18, pp. 121- 122.-

15. "America or Palestine - Which?", editorial in The Modern View (St. Louis, Mo.), December 7, 1917, pp. I and 4.

16. Edwin Black, The Transfer Agreement: The Untold Story of the Secret Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine (New York: Maemillan, 1984), p. 174.

17. Lemi Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators (Westport: Lawrence Hill, 1983), pp. 48-49. [Editor's note: Review of the book by The Times is here]

18. Solomon Zeitlin, "The Jews: Race, Nation or Religion - Which?", The Jewish Quarterly Review (Philadelphia, Pa.), April, 1936, pp. 337-347.

19. "Kahn Opposes Zionism," New York Times, February 6, 1919, p. 24.

20. "Prominent Jews Protest Against Zionism," The Jewish Review and Observer (Cleveland, Ohio), March 14, 1919, pp. 1 and 4.

21. "Most Jews Oppose Zionism, Says Kahn," New York Times, March 9, 1919, p. 9.

22. "Protest to Wilson on Zionist Message," New York Times, September 6, 1918, p. 9.

23. "Protest to Wilson Against Zionist State," New York Times, March 5, 1919, p. 7.

24. "Sees Danger in Zionism," New York Times, September 14, 1918, p. 7.

25. "Why Most American Jews Do Not Favor Zionism," New York Times, September 14, 1918, p. 7.

26. "The Case Against Zionism," Literary Digest, June 14, 1919, pp. 30-3 1.

27. Editorial in The American Hebrew, February 7, 1919, p. 315.

28. William T. Ellis, "Impossible to Give Palestine to the Jews," The American Hebrew, July 18, 1919, p. 23 1.

29. "The Truth About Kiryat Aha Men," Al-Hamishmar, February 8, 1980.

30. "Arabs Oppose Zionism," The American Hebrew, March 28, 1919, p. 467.

3 1. Henry Morgenthau, All in a Lifetime (Doubleday, 1922), p. 293.

32. Ibid., p. 385.

33. "Quit Because of Zionism," New York Times, March 7, 1918, p. 18.

34. "Zionists! Wake Up!", The American Hebrew, June 27, 1919, pp. 153-155.

35. "Israel Not a Nation," editorial in New York Times, July 7, 1920, p. 10.

36. Marcus Aron, "What a Layman Can Do for Judaism," The Union Bulletin, May 192 1, pp. 10 and 27.

37. Joseph Jasin, "A Flagrant Fraud," The New Jewish Chronicle, March 1920, p. 44.

38. "Rabbi Harrison Presents the Jewish Question," The Jewish Review and Observer, November 12, 1920, pp. 1 and 4.

39. "Jaffa Riots Last May Due to Jewish Communists," Denver Jewish News (Denver), November 16, 1921, p. I.

40. "Scrap Zionism, Build Palestine," The American Hebrew, April 29, 192 1, pp. 209-2 10.

41. "Zionism as a Stupendous Fallacy," Literary Digest, July 30, 1921, pp. 30-31.

42. "America Our Zion, Says Morgenthau Assailing Zionism," The World, June 27, 1921, p. 22.

43. "A Jewish Opponent of Zionism," editorial in The New York Evening Post. July 9, 1921, p. 5.

44. "Zionism as the Most Stupendous Fallacy in Jewish History ," Current Opinion, August 192 1, pp. 200-203.

45. "Rabbi Landman Called 'Traitor,'" The Jewish Tribune, April 28, 1922, p. 6.

46. "The Zionist Disease and its Cure," editorial in The American Hebrew, April 28 , 1922 , pp. 665-688.

47. Robert Payne, The Life and Death of Adolf Hitler (New York: 1973), pp. 197-198.

48. "Confusion Worse Confounded," editorial in New York Times, May 7, 1922, p. 6.

49. "A Dangerous Movement," editorial in New York Times, May 28, 1922, p. 4.

50. Adolph S. Ochs, "The Truth About Palestine," The Israelite, April 27, 1922, pp. 5-8.

5 1. Samuel Bowman, "Are the Jewish People a Nation, a Race, or a Religious Entity?', The Modern View, April 28, 1922, pp. 9 and 12.

52. "Save It From Its Friends," editorial in B'nai B'rith Messenger (Los Angeles, Ca.), June 9, 1922, p. 6.

53. "Zionism's Misfortune," editorial in B'nai B'rith Messenger, June 9, 1922, p. 6.

54. "Union of Hebrew Congregations Opposes Jewish State," The Jewish Review and Observer, May 30, 19 19, p. 1.

55. Toledoth Ha-Haganah, volume 2, Part 1, 1964, pp. 251-253.

56. Emil Marmorstem, A Martyr's Message (London: 1975), pp. 1-1 6.

57. Yehuda Bauer, A History of the Holocaust (New York: Franklin Watts, 1982), pp. 77-78.

58. As cited in Rabbi Moshe Schonfeld, Genocide in the Holy Land (New York: Neturei Karta of the U.S.A., 1980), p. 329.

59. Ibid., pp. 496-498.

60. Pinchas Eliyahu, "The Holy Land Struggle," The Jewish Guardian, no. 6, November 1, 1975, p. 13.

61. Joachim Prinz, "Zionism Under the Nazi Government," Young Zionist, November 1937, p. 18.

62. Lenni Brenner, Zionism in the Age of the Dictators, pp. 84-85.

63. Adolph Eichmann, "Eichmann Tells His Own Damning Story," Life, November 28, 1960, p. 22.

64. Draft of Ben-Eliezer's unfinished memoirs, Jabotinsky Institute, Tel-Aviv.

65. Michael Dov-Ber Weissmandel, Min HaMaitzer, p. 92.

66. Ibid., p. 93.

67. Alfred M. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection (New York: Dodd, Mead and Co., 1978), p. 484.

68. Rahbi Moshe Schonfeld, The Holocaust Victims Accuse (New York: Neturei Kana of U.S.A., 1977), Part I, p. 21.

69. Rabbi Michael Dov-Ber Weissmandel, Min HaMaitzer, p. 93.

70. Moshe Pearlmann, The Capture and Trial of Adolf Eichmann (New York: 1963),p. 146.

71. Adolf Eichmann, "I Transported Them to the Butcher," Life, December 5, 1960, p. 146.

72. Yitshak Heimowitz, "On the Kastner Case," Middle East and the West, January 3 1, 1958, p. 3.

73. Affidavit before Mr. Benno H. Selcke, Jr., of American Evidence Division, International Military Tribunal, Nuremberg, 4 August, 1947.

74. Beate Klarsfeld, Wherever They May Be! (New York: Vanguard Press, 1972), pp. 204-205.

75. Ben Hecht, Perfidy (New York: 19611, p. 84.

76. New York Times, December 5. 1982.

77. Yitshaq Ben-Ami, Years of Wrath, Days of Glory (New York: Speller & Sons, 19821, p. 509.

78. The Jewish Standard, Toronto, July 21, 1933.

79. The Jerusalem Post, May 14, 1963.

80. Yaacov Eliav, Wanted (New York: Shengold, 1984).

8 1. Brenner, Zionism in the Age of Dictators, p. 269.

82. Roberta Strauss Feuerlicht, The Fate of the Jews (New York: Times Books, 1983), pp. 232-233. 83. Ibid., p. 233.

84. Ibid., p. 233.

85. Schonfeld, Genocide in the Holy Land, p. 508. 86. /hid., pp. 514-518.

87. Feuerlicht, The Fate of the Jews, p. 231.

88. Lilienthal, The Zionist Connection, p. 133.

89. Feuerlicht, p. 235.

90. Official Neturei Karta pamphlet published in an advertisement in New York Times, November 11, 1975. 9 1. Lilienthal, p. 647.

92. Emile Marmorstein, "Champion of Truth," The Jewish Guardian, November 10,1974, p. 6.

93. "Cold Blooded Murder in Israel?'. The Jewish Guardian, November 10, 1974, pp. 12- 13.

94. Ian Lustick, Arabs in the Jewish State (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1980), p. 190.

95. "Confusion Worse Confounded," editorial in New York Times, May 7, 1922, p. 6.

96. Lilienthal, p. 344.

97. Black, The Transfer Agreement, p. 175.

98. Ibid., pp. 174-175.

99. Commonweal, March 12, 1937, p. 558.

100. Tom Segev, 1949 The First Israelis, (New York: The Free Press, 19861, p. 261.

101. Neturei Karta advertisement, New York Times, November 11, 1975.