The Alleged
“Holocaust” of the Jews is Proving
ever more
Dangerous
By
Professor
Robert
FAURISSON
26 July 2006
Current
events in the Middle East confirm it: the alleged
“Holocaust” of the Jews is a historical lie that
is proving ever more dangerous.
Let
us recall that this alleged “Holocaust”, which is
the sword and the shield of the State of Israel,
possesses at least three aberrant features:
1)
It has created “survivors”
(“miraculous” ones) by the million. Almost
sixty years on from the end of the 1939-1945 war, the number
of “survivors” of that purported
undertaking to exterminate an entire people has been
estimated by the specialist in demographics of Jewish
communities Jacob Ukeles at 687,900 (Haaretz, April
18, 2004).
From that figure it may be deduced that in 1945 the number
of European Jews who had survived the war was most likely in
the region of 3,250,000, a statistic that bears out what we
already knew from other information: never did the Germans
have a policy of physical extermination of the Jews and
never did they possess any of those weapons of mass
destruction called execution “gas chambers” or
execution “gas vans”.
After the war, many Jews stayed in Europe and many
others scattered throughout the world, settling in nearly
sixty countries. So it was that in the late 1990s the teams
put in charge by Steven Spielberg of gathering
survivors’ testimonies had to go to nearly sixty
different countries to record the said testimonies on video
(Survivors of the Shoah Visual
Foundation, P.O. Box
3168, Los Angeles, California 90078, USA; see also a related
article in the French daily Libération of
November 3, 1999, p. 36). Finally, in the present
day, the Jewish population of Israel is close to … six
million (!);
2)
It constitutes a daunting weapon with which to stifle,
crush and kill; see the above drawing, recently passed
on to me by Ahmed Rami, depicting a book that, like writings
in Hebrew, would be read from right to left; hence the
presentation.
3)
It enabled the Zionists to succeed in creating a colony
in 1947-1948, the very time when, everywhere else in the
world, colonial possessions were disintegrating.
Established in the land of Palestine, that colony became a
“Jewish State”, endowed with a “Jewish
Army”.
This State is racialist, domineering and sure of itself. In
accordance with a millennia-old tradition, it has, yet
again, let the Jewish people, — ever prey to the
prophet’s anxiety, ever inclined to groan, to complain,
to threaten blackmail, to preach wars and crusades, -
make itself invariably loathsome wherever it
passes through.
Founded
on the myth of the “Holocaust”, the State of
Israel is doomed
In
a study dated October 8, 2001 and entitled “An
Imaginary Holocaust May Lead to a Real Holocaust” I
wrote: “the State of Israel is henceforth doomed. It
will not even have lasted as long as the ephemeral Christian
kingdom of Jerusalem [which, in actual fact, lived for
89 years]”; then, speaking of the “bad times
ahead for the Jews”, I described already what can be
seen befalling that colonialist State now.
The Zionists will have to leave Palestine. They will be
returning to our climes. In particular, they will invade
Germany where the authorities are already offering a fortune
to Jewish immigrants from anywhere. These wandering Jews
will bewail their “Second Holocaust”. Again they
will be demanding penitence, privileges of all sorts and
“reparations for the irreparable” (a fine Talmudic
oxymoron!).
Thus, those settlers of another era will need to quit
Jerusalem; but will they do so in the manner of the
Europeans of Algeria in 1962 or in that of the Americans, in
1975, in Vietnam? What will the Israelis do with their
nuclear arsenal? How high will the bill for the rest of
humanity run to? One can hardly tell.
On
the other hand, one may rightly affirm that present events
justify the warnings put out in the past by the
revisionists. They had said that the lie of he magical gas
chambers allowed ANYTHING and that, consequently, the world
must be ready for ANYTHING in the way of Jewish
excessiveness. It would have been a good idea to listen to
the revisionists instead of throwing them in prison or
trying to gag them.
Jewish
neurosis and excessiveness in the Zionist myth and the
“Holocaust” myth
Whether
belonging to the State of Israel or the Diaspora, the Jews,
with but too few exceptions like those of Noam Chomsky,
Israel Shahak or Edgar Morin, have acted with callousness
and inhumanity.
Their alleged “Holocaust” has permitted them to
slander nearly all non-Jews, including the wartime Allies,
the Neutrals, the Papacy, the International Committee of the
Red Cross, all accused of having, it seems, let the Germans
exterminate the European Jews.
They have thus accused whole nations of having committed or
allowed to be committed a gigantic crime which, in reality,
was never perpetrated. From this slander of huge proportions
they have drawn, with the greed and cruelty of Shylock, an
orgy of profits in monetary and political terms as well as
in the spheres of the law and the media.
Moreover, they have not cared to show any respect to either
the defeated or the impoverished. Their excessiveness (the
messianic hubris) has made them lose their heads.
These
Jews would be well advised to reflect on what, in 1894,
Bernard Lazare wrote on the first page of his book
Antisemitism: its history and causes and which may be
summarised as follows: if, in every era, in every land,
amongst all races, under all kinds of regime and whatever
the prevailing moral standards and customs, the people of
Israel have incited “hostility” and even
“repugnance”, it is that “the general causes
of antisemitism [have] always lain in Israel itself
and not in those who have fought it.”
Up
to now the revisionists have been treated like Palestinians,
Lebanese or, to talk Jewish, like the “seed of
cattle” and for a long time revisionism has remained
beyond the understanding of the greater part of the world,
but now, in the present day, people are beginning to grasp
its message.
Millions, whole nations, witnesses to what is going on
in the Middle East, are becoming aware, in front of their
television sets, of Jewish neurosis and excessiveness.
At the same time they are discovering, or are about to
discover, with stupefaction, that at the root of the
lie-laden accounts, full of extravagance and hatred, that
make up what the Jews call their “Holocaust
History”, there already lay that same neurosis, that
same excessiveness.
Jewish
fads, extravagances and crazes bound for the rubbish bins of
history
The
“mania for lying and believing lies is as catching as
the itch” (Céline). Man, as is known all too
well, is subject to some quite unlikely fancies. He goes so
far as to kill or get himself killed for ideas that he
sometimes ends up discovering were false all along.
The business of weapons, wars and crusades, of which mass
propaganda is a central component, takes delight in these
false ideas. In the 19th and 20th
centuries the Talmudists took in billions of people with
them.
Freudianism, Zionism, Lenin- or Trotsky-style Communism,
Elie Wiesel-style holocaustic religion or Shoah business
à la Claude Lanzmann, all these inventions
have been grounded in a mixture of false ideas, messianic
utopias and impostures that were essentially Jewish.
After having known triumph, Freudianism (not to be confused
with psychotherapy and psychiatry) and Leninism (not to be
confused with the communist ideal) are now largely
discredited.
As is seen in our present day, Zionism, for its part, leads
to self-destruction and may perhaps bring on a worldwide
catastrophe; the Israelis have killed it.
As for the “Holocaust” religion and Shoah
business, they seem to be flourishing, but, as the American
revisionist Arthur Robert Butz has remarked, the
giant’s feet are made of clay, and this fact is
starting to be noticed.
These
fads, extravagances and crazes, which bear the mark of
Jewish neurosis and excessiveness, look sure to finish one
day in the rubbish bins of history.
But, as far as the “Holocaust” is concerned, that
day is still a long way off, so strongly has the Great Lie
of the 20th century pervaded people’s minds,
like a lethal drug to which one sadly ends up becoming
addicted.
Fortunately the revisionists are here; good
Judeo-therapists that they are (the term is French
revisionist Pierre Guillaume’s), they have no equal
when it comes to treating dependence on holocaustic lie
poison. If, beset with that affliction, one wants to regain
reason and health, there is nothing like a simple cure of
revisionism.
Robert
FAURISSON
|
