Publisher's Note
In the early 1980s, Samisdat Publishers Ltd., under the signature of
its president, Ernst Zündel, published a 32-page booklet entitled
Did Six Million Really Die?. The booklet was published under a licence
from Historical Review Press in England which prohibited Samisdat from
making any changes whatsoever to the publication. Samisdat sent the booklet
to hundreds of teachers, ministers, politicians and media personalities
across Canada in the hope that interest could be aroused in discussing
the subject explored in the booklet: did six million Jews really die pursuant
to a systematic policy of extermination by Nazi Germany during World War
II?
Samisdat received no complaints regarding the booklet's factual accuracy.
Nevertheless, in 1983, Samisdat's president, Ernst Zündel, was charged
under a private information laid by Sabina Citron, a founder of the Canadian
Holocaust Remembrance Association, with the criminal offence of "spreading
false news" likely to cause racial and social intolerance. The charge
was later assumed by the Crown and led to two lengthy jury trials in 1985
and 1988, both of which ended in convictions.
There is no doubt that Did Six Million Really Die? contained errors. It
was written hastily by a young University of London graduate, Richard Verrall
(who used the pseudonym "Richard Harwood") in the early 1970s.
The errors, however, were the type of minor error which one can find in
the first edition of any non-fiction book. For example, Verrall wrote that
the first allegation of mass murder of Jews was made against the Germans
in 1943 by the Polish Jew Raphael Lemkin. In fact, the first charge of
mass murder was made by the Allies in a Joint Declaration issued on December
17, 1942. The error played no significant part in the argumentation of
the author. The significance and importance of Did Six Million Really Die?
lay in its logic, its reasoning and its opinions. It critiqued the weaknesses
of the evidence and arguments provided in orthodox "Holocaust"
literature and it gave to the reader little-known alternate views of what
happened in the camps, such as those of Dr. Russell Barton (who was present
in Bergen-Belsen immediately after its liberation) and Thies Christophersen
(who was stationed near Auschwitz during the war). It summarized the findings
of the French revisionist historian Paul Rassinier, whose works at that
time were not known at all in the English-speaking world. In short, Did
Six Million Really Die? did what polemical works were meant to do: it provided
the reader with an alternate viewpoint on a historical event.
Two juries convicted Zündel notwithstanding devastating cross-examination
of Holocaust "survivors" and Holocaust historians by defence
attorney Douglas H. Christie and notwithstanding expert evidence which
crushed the basis of the Holocaust story, namely, the allegation that millions
of Jews were done to death with industrial efficiency in gigantic gas chambers
and disposed of in crematories and burning pits. It did not matter to the
jury in the second Zündel trial in 1988 that the warden of a United
States penitentiary, Bill M. Armontrout, testified to the enormous difficulties
of gassing even one person today in gas chambers. It did not matter to
the jury that a forensic investigation of Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek
by the only expert in gas chamber technology in the United States, Fred
A. Leuchter, Jr., resulted in Leuchter's opinion that no gassings could
have taken place in the alleged Nazi gas chambers. It mattered not that
the Canadian crematory expert, Ivan Lagacé, testified that the thousands
of persons alleged by Holocaust historians to have been cremated in Birkenau
and Auschwitz daily were "ludicrous" and "beyond the realm
of reality." It did not matter to the jury that the internationally-known
British historian David Irving testified that he no longer believed in
the "Holocaust" as it had been defined by its historians. It
did not matter that Holocaust historian Raul Hilberg refused to return
to testify in 1988 after testifying in 1985 for fear of cross-examination.
It did not matter that the Crown could not produce one expert witness in
gas chambers or crematories to refute the defence expert evidence.
If the evidence presented at the 1988 trial of Zündel was not enough
to convince the jury to acquit him, it was enough to start an explosive
chain reaction of books and studies into the veracity of the gas chamber
claim. The evidence of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr. and his report on the gas
chambers at Auschwitz and Majdanek by far caused the most reverberations.
The Jewish Holocaust lobby at first ignored the Leuchter Report, but as
its influence mounted internationally, they scrambled to attempt to refute
it. The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation published the books Auschwitz: Technique
and Operation of the Gas Chambers and Truth Prevails: Demolishing Holocaust
Denial: the end of "The Leuchter Report." The success of these
books in "demolishing" the Leuchter Report can perhaps be measured
by the fact that almost no one has heard of them; the mass media, usually
so willing to use anything to smear Holocaust revisionism, has virtually
ignored them.
Apparently unable to find competent experts to support the gas chamber
claim among engineers and crematory experts, the Jewish Holocaust lobby
turned the use of their considerable resources instead to ensuring the
destruction of Fred Leuchter's career and the passage of laws in France
and Austria making "denial of the Holocaust" a criminal offence.
A full account of the tactics used against Leuchter can be found in his
article "Witch Hunt in Boston" (Journal of Historical Review,
vol. 10, pp. 453-460). While the Jewish lobby has succeeded in the political
arena in having repressive laws enacted against revisionism, they have
not succeeded in refuting revisionism on its merits, most importantly its
technical and forensic evidence. The report of Fred A. Leuchter, Jr., has
engendered three further studies of the gas chambers.
Krakow Forensic Institute
In response to the Leuchter Report, the Auschwitz State Museum in 1990
commissioned the Krakow Forensic Institute to carry out an investigation
of the alleged gassing sites at the camp. The result of the testing of
brick and mortar samples fully corroborated the findings of Leuchter: the
Institute found either no traces or extremely small traces of cyanide in
its samples. The Institute explained the test results, however, by stating
that it could not be assumed that cyanide traces would still be detected
after 45 years of being subjected to the weather and the elements. The
Krakow Forensic Institute also tested samples of hair from the Auschwitz
Museum for cyanide. The tests proved negative. (For a copy of the report
and commentary, see "An Official Polish Report on the Auschwitz 'Gas
Chambers'", Journal of Historical Review, vol. 11, pp. 207-216).
Germar Rudolf
Germar Rudolf, a diplom chemist in Germany, investigated the sites of the
alleged gas chambers of Auschwitz and took samples for the purpose of determining
cyanide levels. Tests on the samples showed no or minimal traces of cyanide.
Rudolf's report concluded, like Leuchter's, that the alleged gas chambers
at Auschwitz could never have been used for gassings. Rudolf disputed the
Krakow Forensic Institute's conclusion that the cyanide had been removed
by environmental factors, pointing out that it was well-known that cyanide
compounds have enormous environmental resistance. Ernst Zündel's attempts
to call Rudolf as an expert witness on charges in Germany regarding the
"Holocaust" were prevented by the German judge.
Walter Lueftl
Walter Lueftl is a professional engineer with a large engineering firm
in Vienna and is president of the Austrian Chamber of Engineers. In 1992
Lueftl wrote a report calling the alleged extermination of millions of
Jews in gas chambers "technically impossible." He pointed out
that the design of the crematories themselves showed that they were incapable
of handling the number of victims alleged. "Corpses are not flammable
material," wrote Lueftl, " to cremate them requires much time
and energy."
These reports and other mounting evidence have shown the durability of
the conclusions stated in Did Six Million Really Die?. The booklet has
proven to be, in the words of Dr. Robert Faurisson, "prophetic."
Today Samisdat is proud to publish Did Six Million Really Die?:
Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of
Ernst Zündel, 1988. This book is the result of four years of work
and summarizes for the reader the evidence presented at the second Zündel
trial in 1988. This includes, for the Crown, the evidence of Holocaust
historians Raul Hilberg (whose evidence from 1985 was read to the jury
since he refused to reattend personally) and Christopher Browning and the
evidence of Red Cross representative Charles Biedermann. For the defence,
it includes the evidence of the premiere revisionist historian today, Dr.
Robert Faurisson, that of the internationally renowned British historian
David Irving, German historian Udo Walendy, American historian Mark Weber,
Canadian crematory expert Ivan Lagacé and Canadian aerial photograph
expert Ken Wilson. It includes the evidence and the report of Fred A. Leuchter,
Jr., concerning his forensic investigation of the alleged gas chambers
at Auschwitz, Birkenau and Majdanek and the evidence of chemistry expert
Dr. James Roth concerning the cyanide content of samples removed from the
alleged Auschwitz gas chambers by Leuchter. It summarizes the evidence
of the path-breaking Swedish revisionist writer, Ditlieb Felderer, and
reproduces the revealing photographs of Auschwitz and Birkenau which Felderer
showed the jury.
It is shocking that the persecution of Ernst Zündel has continued
for ten years and continues today with virtually no protest either in the
intellectual or media elites of Canada. These elites are apparently no
longer interested in objective truth, but interested only in maintaining
the "political correctness" which will ensure access to lucrative
government and institutional positions, the continuation of government
and academic grants and the accolades of their like-minded peers. These
elites did not simply remain silent concerning the Zündel trials but
participated in a feeding frenzy of hatred against him simply because he
had published a booklet questioning the Holocaust. Few voices were raised
in defence of intellectual freedom and its relation to the workings of
a true democracy. Instead, Zündel was attacked, vilified and ridiculed.
The media willingly censored the 1988 trial. The performance of these elites
in the Zündel affair has shown that they are unwilling to inform Canadians
honestly about controversial and vital issues which offend powerful vested
interests; indeed, it has proven their total corruption.
Ernst Zündel, in the foreword to the first Did Six Million Really
Die?, wrote the following words:
Truth has no need of coercion. Those who choose to ignore the truth
are not punished by law - they punish themselves. We of Samisdat Publishers
do not believe that you should be forced to read something, any more than
we believe that you should be forced not to read something...Whether you
agree or disagree with the facts presented in this booklet, we invite you
to assist us in reclaiming and safeguarding the freedoms we have all so
long enjoyed, until now, in Canada...Without freedom of enquiry and freedom
of access to information we cannot have freedom of thought and without
freedom of thought, we cannot be a free people.
Today those words apply with even greater force as more and more individuals
face prosecution in Canada and Europe for their beliefs and opinions. Samisdat
offers this book to its readers in the hope that they will reclaim for
themselves the right to decide what is truth in history.
 | The
concepts expressed in this document are protected by the basic human
right to freedom of speech, as guaranteed by the First Amendment of the
Constitution of the United States, reaffirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court
as applying to the Internet content on June 26, 1997. |
 |
