An 87-year-old lady of high intelligence and spotless
reputation, Frau Ursula Haverbeck of Vlotho, Germany, has
recently been sentenced to 10 months in prison for speaking out
against incessant German-bashing. What did she say? Demanding proof about
alleged atrocities in Auschwitz, as so repeatedly and
vociferously claimed. She says no such proof can be found.
Sheer heresy!
Specifically, Ms. Haverbeck insists that Auschwitz was a work
camp, not a death camp. That’s good news – isn’t it? She agreed
that there were casualties – as there will be in any war – but
no deaths due to gassings. There never was a Führer plan to kill
the Jews of Europe in government-sponsored, industrial-type
fashion.
She said all this, and more, on an hour-long national television
show called Panorama, similar to America’s Sixty Minutes.
Frau Haverbeck is certainly no skinhead. She comes across as
poised, articulate, and very well-informed. For her heretical
assertions, she is expected to be incarcerated for almost an
entire year. For her principled stand on behalf of historical
truth, she earned herself the leftist slur “Nazi-Oma,” repeated
with palpable relish on just about every European network and
print syndication.
Off with her head!
As Ian Greenlaugh, a VT colleague of mine, noted this morning:
What sort of nation throws 87-year-old women into jail for
speaking the truth? Certainly not one that can consider itself
to be a functioning free and fair democracy.
A “free and fair democracy?” Well, that’s exactly what Germany
is not. We’re talking faux “democracy.” The Bundesrepublik, as
a truncated post-war Germany has been rechristened, is still a
vassal state, a fossil of a war lost by the German military more
than seven decades ago, as we are never allowed to forget.
Here’s what’s not widely understood. Germany is an
Allied-occupied colony and has been for more than 70+ years,
despite a threadbare democratic façade. A conqueror’s ceasefire
was declared in 1945 when the military arm of the Third Reich
surrendered. A pro forma ceasefire came into effect on
the 8th of May 1945 as part of the military alliance called
NATO. But there was never a peace treaty. Ever.
A genuine peace treaty was never allowed to be born.
It is my firm contention that World War II didn’t end. In
Germany, there is a bitter saying that the Bundesrepublik has
been installed “… to keep the Americans in, the Russians out,
and the Germans down.” That folkish wisdom fits the situation.
In 1998 in an interview taped five years before Ernst Zundel was
politically kidnapped in broad daylight on American soil, he
explained to an Israeli reporter exactly what this means:
Germany’s political enemies currently in charge of that chunk of
real estate, called “Germany” in the vernacular, have succeeded
in inducing guilt complexes into an entire unsuspecting
population leading to the classic symptoms of the massive
national psychosis that we can see today. A jokester once
observed that there are more televisions in Germany than there
are bathtubs, which means that brains gets scrubbed more often
and more thoroughly than backsides.
After seventy+ years after the Third Reich surrendered, Germany
is still an occupied country, a fact kept from the German
people, “re-educated” to the hilt. Your average German has not
the faintest clue.
“Induced insanity”, as Dr. Rigolf Hennig, a noted German
psychiatrist, has stated, “has little to do with intelligence
but a great deal to do with suspension of logical thought
brought about by pseudo-religious indoctrination.”
Let me try to explain that to you. As the Catholic Church relies
on Infallibility, politically beholden judges in the German
courts rely on “Manifest Obviousness” or Offenkundigkeit –
roughly akin to the Anglo-Saxon concept of “Judicial Notice” –
meaning “… what exists need not be proven.” Tuesday follows
Monday. The sun sets in the West. The moon shines bright at
night. Moscow is the capital of Russia. Guilt on the German
character is fixed for all eternity. They gassed six million
Jews.
Disbarred attorney Horst Mahler, who was
sentenced to more than 10 years for his politically
incorrect statements
What do you call a country in the very
heart of Europe that does not have its own elected government? A
USA protectorate? An Israeli colony? A trial run for the New
World Order? Twistspeak in the Orwellian mode?
Here is the seamy tale. Legally, the Bundesrepublik is
not the legitimate successor to the Reich. Even Germany’s own
highest Constitutional Court affirmed it. It cannot be the
legitimate successor because, under international law, the
“Reich” is still the legitimate state and two states cannot
legally govern the same geographic area at the same time. Just
as Russia didn’t disappear after the Soviet regime collapsed,
the German Reich continues to exist, regardless of politically
motivated claims to the contrary.
Offenkundigkeit exists
to enforce political dogma and punish heresy. It means that if
you are unlucky enough to end up with a legitimate question –
for instance, Did Six Million Really Die? – before a
judge who toes the expected political line, the fix is in for
you before the trial even begins. A defense on the merits of
your case is strictly precluded by law. You are not allowed to
argue what you suspect to be true, or what you know to
be true, or what you can prove to be true. Offenkundigkeit stands
in the courtroom like the golem that it is – and you
better stand at attention!
You are forbidden by law to bolster your assertion or even your
opinion with evidence such as forensic facts – and if an
attorney is foolish enough to insist, he or she is “guilty” of
the same “crime” as his or her defendant – “guilty by mere
association and intent.
Think of it this way: A man of impeccable repute is falsely
accused of being a thief. Since most defendants are unschooled
on details of the law, he may assume that he must prove his
innocence. Not so! According to law and convention, the state
must prove he stole.
He claims he didn’t steal. He argues there’s no evidence he
stole. He gets himself a lawyer. The lawyer argues that the
accusation can’t be true – where is the evidence? The
judge replies: “It’s obvious. Offenkundig. Are you a
thief yourself? Shut up – or else, I’ll sentence you for
stealing.”
Offenkundigkeit has, thus, become the Holy Cow of German
jurisprudence regarding so-called “war crimes” – and, lately,
hate speech crimes. It gives beholden judges court jester
license.
How can a defense attorney then offer a solid rebuttal, if the
law not only forbids it but endangers the attorney himself? The
short answer is that he can’t. The long answer is written on the
wind.
Ernst Zundel (left) with his long-term
German attorney, Jürgen Rieger, who died mysteriosly
after his client’s trial of a sudden heart attack
The German “war crimes” trials and now
their modern version, “hate crimes” trials, are a farce. They
are the bull horns of a military occupation that likes to dress
itself in democratic finery but is, in fact, an autocratic
instrument enforcing a false history. The simple truth is that
the German Reich was not obliterated when the German
Wehrmacht surrendered. It was kept feeble on purpose by the
victorious Allies so it could be ruled by a malicious cabal that
took over as a provisional government whose function to this
day is to ensure endless “reparation” for a “crime” forensic
science disproved decades ago!
The Bundesrepublik – it’s acronym is BRD – was meant to be a
temporary measure, but you know what happens when unwelcome
guests invade your house, rob you of your property title, dig in
their heels and stay put. If they have the power that you no
longer have, you’re stuck with unwelcome intruders that write
the rules for you!
The Bundesrepublik was never meant to last. It was put in
its place because there was a vacuum – until such time as the
ill-fated Germans, held to be pathologically addicted to
authoritarian rule of grandiose design, were sufficiently
“matured politically” to vote themselves a government more
suitable to Allied tastes. This, sadly, never happened. From the
Allies’ point of view, the occupation was a noble interim – on
paper. Until desirable maturity in the German populace had taken
root, the powers-that-be would rule the besieged, bloodied,
starving, decimated Germans for their own good in their own
ruins, and “re-educate” them thoroughly for as long as it took
until they came to their senses.
Zundel Lead Attorney Sylvia Stolz was bodily
carried out of the courtroom for insisting that her
client had the right to submit exculpatory evidence.
Subsequently, Stolz was sentenced to more than three
years in prison, two-thirds of which she served.
Ceasefire, yes – but no peace treaty.
That ceasefire exists to this day. That means any minute new
guns could start firing again!
The pity is that the Germans were never told of this provisional
arrangement that would have given them their freedom as soon as
they showed proper remorse and paid enough restitution for
crimes alleged to have happened. The facts of the matter were
quietly swept under the rug.
Thus was created a bottomless pit. A thoroughly “re-educated”
German can never show enough remorse. Not as long as there is
still a nickel to be filched or a submarine to be delivered as a
gesture of “good will” to the State of Israel.
Three post-war generations came and went. The usurpers of
Germany’s sovereignty stayed on because they liked their cozy
nests. They made the Germans pay for their own occupation
through an arrangement called Stationierungskosten paid
out of the BRD treasury, defended by the Allies’ guilt cudgel
called Offenkundigkeit. Nobody knew what to ask – until
Ernst Zundel’s Mannheim trial brought that red herring to the
fore.
Judge Meinerzhagen (above), who sentenced Ernst Zundel to five
years’ in prison and who told him during sentencing: “… Even a
bird will refuse to fly over your grave!”
Time-tested Old-Testament hatred!
Today, most Germans fancy themselves to be benevolently ruled by
a smug entity dressed up in democratic finery that still
remains, in fact and law, a provisional administration kept
carefully controlled. It still serves an alien agenda.
What alien agenda, you ask? The New World Order, waiting in the
wings, that’s what.
Zundel
supporters demonstrate in front of the German Embassy in
Washington, D.C.
Germany: Political
Dissident Ursula Haverbeck Sent Back to Prison; May Become
Oldest Female Inmate In the World
By Eric Striker • DECEMBER 5, 2020
Just weeks after finishing a two and a half year
prison sentence for “Holocaust denial,” 92-year-old
Ursula Haverbeck has been convicted
again by German courts, this time for an
interview she gave in 2018 that affirmed her view
that Jews were not systematically killed during
World War II and that the gas chambers at Auschwitz
are a politically motivated lie.
If the federal
court’s sentence of one year in Haverbeck’s newest
case holds up, Germany will have the dubious
distinction of imprisoning the oldest female inmate
in the world, a title previously held by American
Lucille Keppen, who was incarcerated for shooting
her neighbor and was released at age 93.
The German
government has been dragging Haverbeck to court for
decades for disputing Jewish claims of gas chambers
and systematic murder. Haverbeck has famously
protested the kangaroo courts that humiliate and
defame elderly war veterans using
bogus testimony from “survivors.”
Numerous
high-ranking Third Reich officials, soldiers and
concentration camp workers have disputed the
Holocaust narrative since 1945, including Wehrmacht
officer Otto Ernst Remer, Auschwitz employee Thies
Christophersen, Erich Priebke, Leon Degrelle, and SS
soldier Karl Muenter, the latter who died before
his “Holocaust
denial” trial began at the age of 96.
Haverbeck’s late
husband, Werner Georg Haverbeck, was an influential
NSDAP member who himself objected to the blood libel
against the German people known as die Auschwitz
luge (the Auschwitz lie).
The BRD’s legal
system has been ruthless with Haverbeck. The
nonagenarian, who is a prisoner of conscience, was denied
release after serving 2/3 of her prison sentence
as is customary in Germany. While the state freed
1,000 offenders early due
to COVID last March, Haverbeck was only let out in
mid-November.
There is no sign of
shame or human rights concerns in the country, with
the judge in the latest case stressing that
Haverbeck will continue to be punished until she
learns to keep her mouth shut. One can only imagine
the outcry from liberal NGOs if Iran, China or
Russia imprisoned an elderly woman just for
questioning the government’s line.
Haverbeck’s powerful
spirit has become an inspiration for patriots in
Germany and around the world. In 2019, she ran as a
European parliamentary candidate from behind bars
and received 25,000 votes, which was highly
upsetting to the European media establishment. Every
year on her birthday, hundreds of Germans rallied
outside her detention center demanding her release.
Intellectuals and
activists across Europe, the Americas and Japan have
expressed dismay over her mistreatment and the lack
of freedom in the land that claims to be a
“democracy.” At JVA Bielefeld, where Haverbeck was
housed, prison officials struggled to process the
avalanche of letters and flowers their famous
prisoner received throughout her sentence.
For Germany’s
oldest prisoner, it’s clear that she will not cower
before the wrath of the Jewish groups directing
careerist bureaucrats. It’s in the German state’s
reputational interest to stop tormenting Haverbeck,
yet the West’s religious fear of debate over what
occurred during the Second World War continues to
take precedent over all other concerns.
