Zionist CNN: Lair of hypocrites
Freedom Research, July 2020
CNN:
Pretending to be pro-Green while taking money from Big Oil.
CNN and Big Oil, Climate Change, Mid-East dictatorships
CNN's Jewish boss Jeff Zucker bragging about the impact of CNN's reporting.
CNN continously attacks Donald Trump's policies, whether it's his connections to the Saudis, his energy policies and climate change, pretending to be pro-envorinmentalist, pro-Green, anti-fossil fuel.In this strive - pretending to be pro-environment - the network is flooded with campaigns like CNN's "Call to Earth" and the Special Report called "Eco Solutions". The network also runs a "CNN Special" called "Two Degrees" especially dedicated to increase awareness of Global Warming, there one can read about the "The moral case for climate action".
And in November 2019 CNN even ran a special program on its founder Ted Turner, promoting him as "Captain Planet":
All this sounds very fine, we must admit. But as the proverb says, don't bite the hand that feeds, and thus in practice - withstanding all the pro-ecology mumbo-jumbo - CNN is completly dependent on payments from Gulf States, Arab dictatorships funded by Oil Money.
This is revealed by the enormous amount of advertisement these countries pour into CNN. The moneytrail from CNN goes all the way back to these merchants of the Black Gold, of Oil - the very substance CNN pretends to be combatting!
Some examples of late:
For example in October 2019, as CNN are doing a propaganda piece on om Global Warming in their "Go Green" section, CNN runs ad from rich Oilstates, running an ad-clip for "Oil & Gas 4.0" (run by ADNOC, the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company!) (https://oilandgas4.thenational.ae/).
In the same period CNN was also ran an ad for Kuwait's the "Kuwait Fund" (https://www.kuwait-fund.org/en/web/kfund/home).
CNN also could be seen running ads in 2019 for the "Abu Dhabi Strategic Debate 2019" (http://www.epc.ae/event/sixth-abu-dhabi-strategic-debate),
an event in the hands of an ordganization called the "Emirates Policy Center". This just as the Emirates is deeply involved in open warfare in Yemen, causing a humanitarian disaster.
In December 2019 CNN was seen running an ad with the slogan "Energy for life", funded by Dubai's oil company ADNOC (Abu Dhabi National Oil Company).
In November 2019 we saw CNN running an ad-campaign for the Abu Dhabi based investment firm Mubadala Development Company, an ad running the slogan; "We care for the environment"!
In the same month also seeing CNN running regular ads for the Abu Dhabi based media "free zone" under the label "Twofour54" (where CNN itself has its Abu Dhabi base), whith "Twofour54" boasting of "zero corporate tax".
CNN in the same period also running ads for the high-tech "Expo 2020 Dubai" .
November 2019 also saw CNN extensively running an ad for UAE's campaign "Visit Dubai", a campaign crowned with lavish videoclips with celebrity actresses on holiday in Dubai whom, by the way, two of three are Jewish (i.e. Gwyneth Palrow and Kate Hudson).
CNN in November 2019 also ran regular ads for Abu Dhabi's "Rotana Hotels", and Qatari "Bein Sports", and a special CNN segment on Abu Dhabi (CNN Travel's "60 Seconds").
CNN also runs frequent ads for Gulf Arab oil states air companies "Emirates" and "Qatar Airways" (which also is sponsors CNN's "World Weather"). Especially remarkable as CNN propagating itself to be against CO-emissions.
CNN also runs ads for all kinds of sports events in the same countries.
In December 2019 running ad for Abu Dhabi's "Mubadala World Tennis championship" (https://www.mubadalawtc.com/) and Dubai's "DP World Tour Championship" (https://www.visitdubai.com/en/events/dp-world-tour-championships-2019)
In December 2019 we could also see CNN running an ad-campaign for the "Dubai Desert Classic" golf tournament, sponsored by luxury watch brand Omega, as well as running an ad for "Oman Unlimited", with focus on air transport.
Also in November 2019 running ad for Abu Dhabi's real estate company Aldar Properties and its T10 Cricket League.
CNN running as for other countries with - to say the least, dubious, democratic credentials...
CNN runs regular ads for the General Sisi dictatorship Egypt, with for instance a focus on tourism and in November 2019, running an ad for MEGA, "Make Egypt Great Again"-campaign run by the Egyptian regime's Ministry of Investment and Cooperation.And in December 2019 we could see CNN running the campaign ad "Invest in Egypt", also paid by the General Sisi dictatorship (see last line in screencap of the ad below).
CNN also runs ads for Azebaijan tourism, a country completly drenched in oil (see photo) and also with a dubious record - to say the least - concerning human rights and corruption!
The oil fields of Azerbaijan... rarely seen on CNN.
CNN also has a close relationship to the Aviation business, regularly promoting flying and is loaded with airplane ads for companies like ANA (Japan), Turkish Airlines, Korean Airlines, Qatar Airways, and Thai Air, to name a few.
In December 2019 the channel was also running an ad for the powerful IATA (International Air Transport Association), an ad as part of a IATA campaign "Aviation Benefits Beyond Borders", where one of the slogans the CNN-peddled ad is "advancing sustainable aviation".
Apart from ads supported by corrupt Arab Oil States, other big oil companies flush CNN with money, as payment for CNN airing their pro-Oil/Carbonfuels propaganda.
The article "Big Oil Ads Beat Out Climate News On CNN" (Huffington Post, 26 apr. 2016), writes:
So, in November 2019 we could see CNN running an ad for the infamous U.S. oil company Exxon Mobile (behind the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster)
and in December 2019 we saw CNN running an ad-campaign for BP - British Petroleum.
This connection CNN-Big Oil has been highlighted in several thourough analyses.
Fossil fuel ads are drowning out news reports about climate change on CNN.
During one week in January, just after NASA announced that 2015 was the hottest year on record, CNN viewers saw over 10 times more advertising from the oil and gas industry than reporting about the world’s climate, according to a new study from the nonprofit Media Matters. While the cable news network devoted less than a minute to stories about the warming planet that week, it sold over 13 minutes of air time to the American Petroleum Institute, the country’s largest oil and gas trade group. [...]
The more recent onslaught of advertising on CNN is likely meant to convince the public that fossil fuels remain a necessary part of the American economy. “This is a very, very sophisticated operation to try to manipulate public opinion regarding fossil fuels,” [...]
The article by journalist Glenn Greenwald (famous for his revelations on U.S. surveillance and the U.S. whistleblower Edward Snowden), "CNN and the business of state-sponsored TV news" (The Guardian, 4 September 2012), highlights the intimate relationship between CNN and different régimes, mainly Mid-East oil dictatorships...
As the article noted "The network is seriously compromising its journalism in the Gulf states by blurring the line between advertising and editorial".
The article writes on CNN International (CNNi):CNNi has aggressively pursued a business strategy of extensive, multifaceted financial arrangements between the network and several of the most repressive regimes around the world which the network purports to cover.
[...]
CNNi's pursuit of and reliance on revenue from Middle East regimes increased significantly after the 2008 financial crisis, which caused the network to suffer significant losses in corporate sponsorships. It thus pursued all-new, journalistically dubious ways to earn revenue from governments around the world.The article further deals with CNN's alliance with the repressive regime in Bahrain (recommende reading in detail in the original Guardian article), and states:
As negative news stories of its brutal repression grew in the wake of the Arab Spring, the regime undertook a massive, very well-funded PR campaign to improve its image. Central to that campaign was CNN International.One large contract was with the advertising giant M&C Saatchi.It should here be noted that M&C Saatchi is in the hands of the Jewish Saatchi family (originally Iraqi Jews).
Greenwald reveals further on the connection between CNN and Israel:
For her part, Amber Lyon insists that CNN journalists and producers complained relentlessly about the type of business-driven censorship she now vocally claims was prevalent at CNN. Back in 2004, the Guardian's Chris McGreal reported on the network's Middle East bureau:
Lyon insists that few are willing to speak out due to fear that they will immediately be viewed as a troublemaker and made radioactive to future news employers. Several former CNN employees echoed Lyon's experiences and complaints, but nobody other than her would speak on the record."CNN sources say the network has bowed to considerable pressure on its editors. Israeli officials boast that they now have only to call a number at the network's headquarters in Atlanta to pull any story they do not like."
The hypocrite CNN newschannel also pretends to be on the "little guy's" side but is deeply connected to Big Money Elites, running elitist programs on Luxury consumption, dedicating CNN Specials on business like CNN's "Passion to PortFolio" and "One Square Meter", and on business and travel (CNN's "Business Traveller" with Jew Richard Quest, sponsored by luxury hotel brand Radisson Hotels) and with programs with special focus on sports of the "elite" like horse racing ("Winning Post - an elegant life"), on Golf, on Sailing.
Programs sponsored by luxury watches brands like Longines, Rolex and Breitling.
The "Call to Earth" CNN environmentalist campaign launched November 2019 - sponsored by the Rolex luxurious watches brand!
CNN also regularly airs programs sponsored by corrupt Nigerian banks like Zenith Bank (CNN's program "Inside Africa") and Access Bank (CNN's programs "African Avantgarde" and "Passion to PortFolio").
For more read the articles:
"Zenith Bank GMD, Peter Amangbo, arrested" (Premium Times, August 26, 2018)
"Head of Nigerian Bank Zenith Questioned by Anti-Graft Agency" (Bloomberg, August 27, 2018)
"Citigroup and Zenith Bank face stiffest Nigeria penalties over credit targets" (BusinessDay, 3 October 2019)
"Access Bank CEO Herbert Wigwe To Stand Trial For N2.5bn Fraud" (Sahara Reporters, March 8, 2019)
"Banks caught up in Nigeria anti-corruption push" (on CNN's partner Access Bank, Euromoney,June 02, 2016
Full article: https://www.euromoney.com/article/b12kp8h1jj2x1l/banks-caught-up-in-nigeria-anti-corruption-push?copyrightInfo=true
Visit http://www.euromoney.com/reprints for additional distribution rights. For more articles like this, follow us @euromoney on Twitter.June 02, 20162 June, 2016)
Full article: https://www.euromoney.com/article/b12kp8h1jj2x1l/banks-caught-up-in-nigeria-anti-corruption-push?copyrightInfo=true
Visit http://www.euromoney.com/reprints for additional distribution rights. For more articles like this, follow us @euromoney on Twitter.
Banks caught up in Nigeria anti-corruption push
Full article: https://www.euromoney.com/article/b12kp8h1jj2x1l/banks-caught-up-in-nigeria-anti-corruption-push?copyrightInfo=true
Visit http://www.euromoney.com/reprints for additional distribution rights. For more articles like this, follow us @euromoney on Twitter.CNN also cooperates with the notorious Nigerian Dangote Group that regularly runs ads in CNN and as late as November 2019 sponsored CNN's programmes "The Profit Point" and "Marketplace Africa".
See also articles:
"Aliko Dangote Is A Criminal" (Sahara Reporters, March 18, 2011)
"The Fraudulent Nigerian Forbes Billionaires" (on Dangote, medium.com, June 30, 2015)
These corrupt financial institutions in Nigeria are one of the prime factors for the neglect and poverty of the masses in that African country, and CNN here has choosen side, the side of the rich, of the corrupt.
CNN has also been seen running a series of ridiculously propagandistic Israeli ads (in November 2019-February 2020), an ad-campaign portraying Israel as a promoter of health care in in Africa!
In the Israeli article "Israel to launch campaign on CNN to boost image in Africa" (Israel Hayom, 11-29-2019) one can read:
The Israeli government and CNN will for the first time launch a campaign aimed at presenting the Jewish state to Africa, with the goal of branding it as a force for good in the continent.
Despite the network being repeatedly criticized by Israel over alleged bias, several Israeli ministries have hired the network to produce promotional videos with a focus on how Israel has helped the residents of the continent.
Apart from airing the videos, CNN will also launch a special portal to allow users to explore the various Israeli projects in Africa, particularly in agriculture, medicine, and energy.The campaign, which cost some 4 million shekels (1.2 million dollars) will run for 3 months and will see hundreds of airings and a flurry of posts on social media.
The decision to work with CNN comes in light of its broadcast potentially reaching more than 475 million households and hotel rooms worldwide, while its internet platforms reaching some 220 million people a month.
"This campaign will help us shed Israel in a positive light and present its great contribution in a variety of fields," the acting director general at the Prime Minister's Office told Israel Hayom.
An Israeli ad-campaign with the end caption "Hope realised - Israel".
A North Koreanesque campaign running cheap propaganda slogans such as "The spirit of Israel is collaboration", "The spirit of Israel is dedication, determination".
The CNN Israel-ad also runs slogans such as "we are trying to save as many women as possible", that Israel's
"main goal is to save as many lives as quickly as possible", "the main goal is to impove healthcare around the world".
Claims drenched in total chutzpah - Jewish audacity - considering Israel's support to dictatorships in Africa, its involvment in "Blood Diamonds", its historical support to the racist Apartheid régime in South Africa and that régime's vicious campaign of targeted destruction of civilian infrastructure, including the healthcare systems of the Frontline States of Angola and Mozambique.
More can be read on this subject in our section on Jewish-Israeli influence/involvment in Africa - and - in our section on Jewish racism torwards Blacks/Africans.
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
CNN supporting anti-Black racist "rebels" in Libya, cooperating with extremists
Recently CNN has got a lot of worldwide fame for the channel's exposure of the "slave markets" in Libya and the hardships for Black Africans detained there.
This also looks very good at a glance, but requires that you have no recollection whatsoever of what has happened in Libya in the last decade.
The grim reality is that CNN openly endorsed the overthrow of the Arab leader Muammar Gaddafi, and during the struggle to overthrow him CNN was deeply embedded with the the fighters of different anti-Gaddafi groups, groups connected to the worst of atrocities against Africans of Dark skin, of Blacks, of Sub-Saharan Africans!
The CNN-supported anti-Gaddafi rebels where; 1) affiliated to groups that the hypocrites of CNN usually designates as "Islamic radicals" and "Jihadists", and 2.) vehemently anti-Black racists, as Blacks in Libya in the rebel-propaganda were portrayed as agents of Gaddafi.
So in the months during and after Gaddafi's violent death, a wave of murders and violence on Blacks, engulfed NATO-liberated Libya.
Note: Pictures below never showed in CNN or other pro-Zionist Western media, who pretend that they are pro-Black...
Not only were the CNN-supported "freedom fighters" engaged in summary executions of Blacks/Africans, but also subjected them to the worst of tortures, as detailed below.
The British The Telegraph wrote in the article "Black Africans 'forced to eat Gaddafi's flag' in Libya" (06 Mar 2012): "Video has appeared on the Internet that appears to show Libyan rebels tormenting a group of black Africans, locking them in a zoo-like cage and forcing them to eat the old Libyan flag" (the shocking video on the Western-backed rebels racism can also be seen here.
This CNN hypocrisy, of making a "scoop" and lamenting the slave markets of Libya, and simultaneously completly hushing their own role in the unleashing of racist forces in the country, has been thoroughly dissected by other media observers.
The readable article "Media Erase NATO Role in Bringing Slave Markets to Libya" (Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, November 28, 2017), details:
NATO supported an array of rebel groups fighting on the ground in Libya, many of which were dominated by Islamist extremists and harbored violently racist views. Militants in the NATO-backed rebel stronghold of Misrata even referred to themselves in 2011 as “the brigade for purging slaves, black skin”—an eerie foreshadowing of the horrors that were to come.Under the title "The Extreme Racism of Libyan Rebels", the fair.org-article continues, detailing the anti-Black racism of the CNN-affiliated Libyan rebel groups:
[...]
Corporate media, however, have largely forgotten about the key role NATO played in destroying Libya’s government, destabilizing the country and empowering human traffickers.
Moreover, even the few news reports that do acknowledge NATO’s complicity in the chaos in Libya do not go a step further and detail the well-documented, violent racism of the NATO-backed Libyan rebels who ushered in slavery after ethnically cleansing and committing brutal crimes against black Libyans.
[...]
CNN (11/14/17) published an explosive story in mid-November that offered a firsthand look at the slave trade in Libya. The media network obtained terrifying video that shows young African refugees being auctioned, “big strong boys for farm work,” sold for as little as $400.
The flashy CNN multimedia report included bonuses galore: two videos, two animated gifs, two photos and a chart. But something was missing: The 1,000-word story made no mention of NATO, or the 2011 war that destroyed Libya’s government, or Muammar Qadhafi, or any kind of historical and political context whatsoever.
Despite these huge flaws, the CNN report was widely celebrated, and made an impact in a corporate media apparatus that otherwise cares little about North Africa. A flurry of media reports followed. These stories overwhelmingly spoke of slavery in Libya as an apolitical and timeless human rights issue, not as a political problem rooted in very recent history.
[...]
Another 1,200-word CNN follow-up article (11/23/17) was just as obfuscatory. It was only in the 35th paragraph of this 36-graf story that a Human Rights Watch researcher noted, “Libyan interim authorities have been dragging their feet on virtually all investigations they supposedly started, yet never concluded, since the 2011 uprising.” NATO’s leadership in this 2011 uprising was, however, ignored.
As a small parenthesis Kenneth Roth, executive director of HRW and who applauded the NATO-intervention, is Jewish.Looking back at Libya’s anti-Qadhafi rebels, both during and after the 2011 war, it is very clear that hardline anti-black racism was widespread in the NATO-backed opposition. A 2016 investigation by the British House of Common’s Foreign Affairs Committee (Salon, 9/16/16) acknowledged that “militant Islamist militias played a critical role in the rebellion from February 2011 onwards.” But many rebels were not just fundamentalist; they were also violently racist.
It is unfortunately no surprise that these extremist Libyan militants later enslaved African refugees and migrants: They were hinting at it from the very beginning.
Most American and European media coverage at the time of NATO’s military intervention was decidedly pro-rebel. When reporters got on the ground, however, they began publishing a few more nuanced pieces that hinted at the reality of the opposition. These were insignificant in number, but they are enlightening and worth revisiting.
Three months into the NATO war, in June 2011, the Wall Street Journal‘s Sam Dagher (6/21/11) reported from Misrata, Libya’s third-largest city and a major hub for the opposition, where he noted he saw rebel slogans like “the brigade for purging slaves, black skin.”
Dahger indicated that the rebel stronghold of Misrata was dominated by “tightly knit white merchant families,” whereas “the south of the country, which is predominantly black, mainly backs Col. Gadhafi.”
Other graffiti in Misrata read “Traitors keep out.” By “traitors,” rebels were referring to Libyans from the town of Tawergha, which the Journal explained is “inhabited mostly by black Libyans, a legacy of its 19th-century origins as a transit town in the slave trade.”
Dagher reported that some Libyan rebel leaders were “calling for the expulsion of Tawerghans from the area” and “banning Tawergha natives from ever working, living or sending their children to schools in Misrata.” He added that predominately Tawergha neighborhoods in Misrata had already been emptied. Black Libyans were “gone or in hiding, fearing revenge attacks by Misratans, amid reports of bounties for their capture.”
The rebel commander Ibrahim al-Halbous told the Journal, “Tawergha no longer exists, only Misrata.”
Al-Halbous would later reappear in a report by the Sunday Telegraph (9/11/11), reiterating to the British newspaper, “Tawarga no longer exists.” (When Halbous was injured in September, the New York Times—9/20/11—portrayed him sympathetically as a martyr in the heroic fight against Qadhafi. The Halbous brigade has in the years since become an influential militia in Libya.)
Like Dagher, the Telegraph‘s Andrew Gilligan drew attention to the slogan painted on the road between Misrata and Tawergha: “the brigade for purging slaves [and] black skin.”
Gilligan reported from Tawergha, or rather from the remnants of the majority-black town, which he noted had “been emptied of its people, vandalized and partly burned by rebel forces.” A rebel leader said of the dark-skinned residents, “We said if they didn’t go, they would be conquered and imprisoned. Every single one of them has left, and we will never allow them to come back.”
Gilligan noted “a racist undercurrent. Many Tawargas, though neither immigrants nor Gaddafi’s much-ballyhooed African mercenaries, are descended from slaves, and are darker than most Libyans.”
The North Atlantic Treaty Organization assisted these virulently racist rebels in Misrata. NATO forces frequently launched air attacks on the city. French fighter jets shot down Libyan planes over Misrata. The US and UK fired cruise missiles at Libyan government targets, and the US launched Predator drone strikes. The Canadian air force also attacked Libyan forces, pushing them out of Misrata.
In a public relations video NATO published in May 2011, early in the Libya war, the Western military alliance openly admitted that it intentionally allowed “Libyan rebels to transport arms from Benghazi to Misrata.” Political scientist Micah Zenko (Foreign Policy, 3/22/16) pointed out the implications of this video: “A NATO surface vessel stationed in the Mediterranean to enforce an arms embargo did exactly the opposite, and NATO was comfortable posting a video demonstrating its hypocrisy.”
Throughout the war and after, Libyan rebels continued carrying out racist sectarian attacks against their black compatriots. These attacks have been well documented by mainstream human rights organizations.
Human Rights Watch’s longtime executive director Kenneth Roth cheered on NATO intervention in Libya in 2011, calling the UN Security Council’s unanimous endorsement of a no-fly zone a “remarkable” confirmation of the so-called “responsibility to protect” doctrine.
Roth’s organization, however, could not ignore the crimes anti-Qadhafi militants committed against dark-skinned Libyans and migrants.
In September 2011, when the war was still ongoing, Human Rights Watch reported on Libyan rebels’ “arbitrary arrests and abuse of African migrant workers and black Libyans assumed to be [pro-Qadhafi] mercenaries.”
Then in October, the top US human rights organization noted that Libyan militias were “terrorizing the displaced residents of the nearby town of Tawergha,” the majority-black community that had been a stronghold of support for Qadhafi. “The entire town of 30,000 people is abandoned—some of it ransacked and burned—and Misrata brigade commanders say the residents of Tawergha should never return,” HRW added. Witnesses “gave credible accounts of some Misrata militias shooting unarmed Tawerghans, and of arbitrary arrests and beatings of Tawerghan detainees, in a few cases leading to death.”
In 2013, HRW reported further on the ethnic cleansing of the black community of Tawergha. The human rights organization, whose chief had so effusively supported the military intervention, wrote: “The forced displacement of roughly 40,000 people, arbitrary detentions, torture and killings are widespread, systematic and sufficiently organized to be crimes against humanity.”
These atrocities are undeniable, and they lead a path straight to the enslavement of African refugees and migrants. But to acknowledge NATO’s complicity in empowering these racist extremist militants, corporate media would have to acknowledge NATO’s role in the 2011 regime change war in Libya in the first place.
The article "Washington’s Fake War on ISIS “Moves” to Libya" (Mondialisation.ca, 20 avril 2016), also notes on CNN's Libyan rebels and the - at the time - rising group, ISIS:
Even in 2011, it was clear to geopolitical analysts that military intervention in Libya was an attempt to divide and destroy the country, giving the US and its collaborators a base of operations to further disrupt and reorder the Middle East and North Africa region (MENA). Almost immediately after US-led strikes on Libya coordinated with terrorist factions on the ground successfully overthrew the Libyan government, weapons and fighters were sent to Syria via NATO-member Turkey. CNN’s 2012 article, “Libya rebels move onto Syrian battlefield,” would report that:
Their war for freedom in Libya may be over, but almost a year after they won the battle for the Libyan capital, a group of fighters have a new battlefield: Syria. Under the command of one of Libya’s most well known rebel commanders, Al-Mahdi al-Harati, more than 30 Libyan fighters have made their way into Syria to support the Free Syrian Army rebels in their war against President Bashar al-Assad’s regime.
It is difficult to believe CNN’s inaccuracy in its report was not intentional. Far from a “war for freedom,” it is clear that Al-Mahdi al-Harati led just one of many proxy armies raised by the United States and its Persian Gulf allies. The group espouses an extremist tinge propagated by US-ally Saudi Arabia, and in no way represents either the Libyan people, nor the people of Syria it claimed to be fighting on behalf of. Al-Harati is now “mayor” of Tripoli, and is just one example which goes a long way in explaining the continuous chaos that has engulfed the country. Quite literally, foreign-funded terrorists are running the country. Ironically, the same CNN that in 2012 celebrated the spreading “war for freedom,” would report in a more recent article titled, “ISIS fighters in Libya surge as group suffers setbacks in Syria, Iraq,” that:
There may now be up to 6,500 ISIS fighters in Libya, twice the number previously thought, according to several U.S. intelligence officials. They attributed the increase to the U.S. analysis that ISIS is diverting more fighters to Libya from Syria — and from Turkey when they cannot get into Syria.
It is ironic because the so-called “Islamic State” (IS) is using precisely the same logistical, financial and political networks to flow back into Libya that CNN’s “freedom fighters” used to get to Syria in the first place. In fact, it is quite clear Libya is simply reabsorbing the mercenary forces organized and sent to Syria in part through direct US-backing in the Libyan terror capital of Benghazi since late 2011 onward.
Clip published on Liveleak 23rd March 2012, showing Western-supported rebel convoy
parading through Sirte, Libya, with the charasteristic black flag of ISIS.
And in Libya's second largest city Benghazi the black flag of Al Qaida was raised over the courthouse after Gaddafi's death!
No coverage from CNN!
This CNN tactic of supporting groups with criminal human rights records and ideological anti-Democratic stances, has continued in other fields of war and conflict.
This is specially true during the war in Syria, where CNN sided with groups aligned to so-called radical, fundamentalist salafists, islamist radicals etc.
While harshly criticizing Donald Trump for his plans of American troop withdrawal from Syria in 2019, portraying it as a victory for "terrorists" - the same CNN has seen itself deeply embedded with all kinds of groups, many of them qualifying as the very "terrorists" CNN say they are against.
The lengthy article by Max Blumenthal contains a lot of information on this subject: "CNN hired top al-Qaeda propagandist for award-winning Syria documentary and wants to cover its tracks" (The Grayzone, July 6, 2017) and tells the story of how: "Star CNN correspondent Clarissa Ward worked with al-Qaeda “media man” Bilal Abdul Kareem to gain access to extremist rebel “heroes on the ground” in Syria."
Blumenthal on CNN's Clarissa Ward's journalistic career in the Syrian War:
She returned from her journey into rebel-held territory with what amounted to a commercial for the Free Syrian Army, a now-defunct collection of CIA-backed militias, who in her words, “pledge to defend the Syrian people against the Assad regime.”
It was the beginning of a long and fruitful relationship with the Syrian opposition as it evolved into an armed insurgency led by al-Qaeda’s local franchise.
Blumenthal writes:
Clarissa Ward’s coverage for the Undercover in Syria CNN special took place in rebel-held eastern Aleppo and Idlib. In these areas, she appeared in a full black niqab to comport with the dress code imposed by al-Nusra, whose legal apparatus had forbidden the wearing of colorful hijab and even outlawed smoking cigarettes and playing music.
Working alongside Abdul Kareem, Ward documented the aftermath of bombings by the Syrian and Russian militaries and the cruelty they visited on the civilian population. She framed the Syrian government’s battle to oust the jihadist-led rebels from eastern Aleppo as “a war on normalcy.”
At the time, Ward was possibly the only Western reporter welcomed into al-Nusra-controlled territory.
Blumenthal concludes:
But Ward has not followed her own advice where the majority of Syria’s population is concerned. Her coverage has tuned out the voices of the 18 million people who live under government control in order to propagate a one-sided narrative aimed at generating public support for regime change. Since the beginning of Syria’s civil war, CNN has virtually ignored the experiences of those who live in constant fear of the U.S. and Gulf-backed rebels that Ward branded as “heroes.”
In her apparent zeal for access, Clarissa Ward solicited a working partnership with one of al-Qaeda’s top propagandists in Syria, Bilal Abdul Kareem. Having reaped the benefits of its star correspondent’s partnership with a jihadist “media man,” CNN now seeks to erase their affiliation altogether.
CNN’s Clarissa Ward in an award-winning theatrical performance from Al Qaeda-controlled East Aleppo, Syria.
This CNN tendency has also been seen in the crisis in Ukraine: Main Stream Media channels like CNN, who frequently run hysterical campaigns on "the rise of Neo-Nazism and the Far Right", have no problem to interact with the most radical right-wing groups in Ukraine.
CNN's Clarissa Ward with a Ukrainian fighter on the frontline versus pro-Russian separatists, CNN 4th November 2019.
Close up of the same soldier; check the emblem on his helmet. CNN designates him just as "Ukrainian", nothing at all is mentioned of the political group he belongs to.
Close-up of the soldier's helmet, clearly showing the Right Sector classic black-down-red-up, logotype.
The Right Sector group's flag to the right.
The same Clarissa Ward program, aired CNN 4th November 2019, where she travles with the "Ukrainian" soldiers to the frontline. The Right Sector's colours in red-black even painted side-to-side with the Ukrainian blue-yellow national colours, clearly showing who is in charge.
A picture of pro-Western, CNN supported, Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko from 2018, with a close-up clearly showing one of the Ukrainian paratroopers wearing the Nazi SS-Totenkopf division emblem.
More on the alliance between these groups and the Jewish oligarchs at the centres of power in Ukraine can be read in our special section on Jewish-Israeli power in Ukraine.
CNN hypocrisy on Mexico Wall, immigrant caravans versus Israel's policies on immigrants
When it comes to the Donald Trump political régime after his election win 2016, CNN revealed its real colours. "Biased" is just an understatement.Suddenly the most disgusting U.S. secrets - that CNN during decades had helped to silence, helped to quell - where brought into the spotlight, revealed - for all to see.
But not for the cause of Humanity as they try to imply, but only to damage Trump politically, as his agenda didn't really fit theirs.
We will here serve some examples.
When it comes ta illegal mass immigration, CNN portrays itself as a bandwagon of Humanism, vis-à-vis the inhumane persons who criticize uncontrolled, unchecked, penetration of the U.S. borders.This attitude, it should be noted, is a rather new position from CNN and the Democratic Party, and part of their new strategy to recruit support in the Latino and Leftist groupings.
But if you have no memory, you can easily be deceived by all this beautiful talk, all these teardripping CNN reports on separated immigrant children, on the caravans heading North, on the plight and suffering of the immigrants...
Please see the following video packed with authentic speeches on immigration by leading Democrats
This video compilation has been deleted by YouTube, and if you see it, you will understand why...
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vt_tSdybaXI/
So to sum-up, CNN favourite and Democratic Party (Jewish) politician Chuck Schumer in 2009:
- Americans don't like illegal immigration
- "Illegal immigration is wrong"
- People illegally in the U.S. are "illegal aliens," not "undocumented"
- Border fence made the southern border "far more secure...created a significant barrier to illegal immigration"At a town-hall-style gathering, Mrs. Clinton says she helped push funding “to build a barrier to try to prevent illegal immigrants from coming in.”
Mr. Schumer says flatly that “Illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple,” and Mr. Obama says that “we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked.”
Then you can also have a moral perspective on the whole issue of Latino mass-immigration to the U.S.
How can one endorse that people whose very countries have been ruined by decennia of U.S. policies, including The Monroe Doctrine, the military interventions, the coups, the support of bloody dictatorships, the death squads, the CIA-run torture centers - how can you applaud that these very victims of U.S. policies whose countries have been ripped apart, now willingly want to go to the very Devil that has caused all this plight, to work there as low-payed dollar-slaves, cleaning cars, flipping burgers - for the very state that caused their present predicament.
It is as if one would consider it as positive, hailing the mass immigration of Jews back to Germany just after the closure of the Second World War, to work under German surveillance, to slave under the very people that just had inflicted them so much harm.
No, as a proud Latin American, considering what the U.S. of A has inflicted the whole continent, you should boycott that country, and devise a plan to get your countries out of their present predicaments, either organizing yourself politically, make the necessary reforms, perhaps even a revolutionary upheaval - but NEVER, NEVER capitulate and simply abandon your homeland, to become a dollar-slave in the USA!
No, CNN don't buy into such high levels of morals.
For them letting in hoards of low-income minions fits their economic and demographic plans, as these Latinos will be a very loyal force in comming elections, as their whole future in the USA is dependent on their Democratic Party "benefecators" and their goodwill.
These CNN journalists shedding crocodile tears on the plight of the Latino immigrants is just for the audiences. Privately they don't care the bit, but love to have low income immigrants cleaning their toilets, sweeping their floors, caretaking their children, washing their cars, mowing their lawns, cleansing their swimming pools...
The hypocrisy of the CNN stance on illegal immigrants is also revealed when noting CNN's fake "upset" tone when reporting on Donald Trump dismissing those immigrant caravans as part of an "invasion".
His use of the word "invasion" is especially repuignant, according to the CNN political commissars. A lot has been aired on this issue, many people have been mobilized to detest Trump's wording. According to CNN the wording is shocking.
But lo and behold, what about the State of Israel? What about the darling of a large chunk of CNN's own staff members, their state of choice, where they feel they are part of, where they have their relatives, a state which many of them even are ready to die for? What does Israel do?
Yes, it uses the very same terminology as Trump when discussing, for instance, African immigrants on Israel's borders.
The terms used by Israeli governmental officials are terms such as, to give a few examples "infiltrators", speaking of the immigrants as an "infection". And on a Israeli-Jew-on-the-street-level, vulgarities are readily expressed such as calling the non-Jewish immigrants "slaves", "nigger", "a cancer", "go back to jungle...".
But in the case of Israel and its walls and barriers, CNN is dead quiet. No media exposure!
CNN's hypocrisy on U.S. foreign policies;
CNN's agenda is to counteract and malignify Donald Trump as much as possible to pave way for his demise so he can be replaced with a more palatable, equally Zionist, stooge to use as a Gentile Front for the Jewish power running present-day America.
torture, U.S. weapons used in war crimes, military coups in foreign countries
Thus CNN lately has embarked on a campaign of "revealing" - as it were CNN-exclusive "news" - some of the worst aspects of U.S. policies, presenting them as specific for Trump's régime, although they have formed a hideous backbone of U.S. foreign policy for decennia, as part of the U.S.' dirty game of global control.
Torture:
As an example of this, see the CNN article: "Will Trump's new CIA pick denounce torture programs she was part of?" (CNN, March 14, 2018)
For us who have studied and actually even know the very victims of U.S. torture of political dissidents in South America in the 1970's and -80's and also knowing the extent of such practises in the latest rendition scandals during the "War on Terror", it comes as a great chutzpah to see CNN, who always have downplayed this U.S. tool - i.e torture - now presenting themselves as "revealing" U.S. torture policies, under Donald Trump's reign.
It could here be good to do some refreshening of the memory, as Hollywood in Jewish hands - "The Dream Factory" - barely ever focuses on these victims.
Some CIA highlights:
- "Operation Condor", a U.S./CIA-backed campaign of political repression and state terror involving assassination of opponents.
- Human rights violations by the CIA, read Wikipedia's summation.
These crimes also include the U.S. supported massacre of 200 000 Guatemaleans, mainly Mayan indigenous population, during the 1980's and - for instance - the death by casting opposition intellectuals out of aircraft over the Atlantic Sea(!), by the U.S.-supported military régime in Argentina, the so-called "Death Flights" (included in the 20-30 000 "disappeared"), and CIA's murderous "Phoenix Program" in Vietnam.
One such paid agent of the U.S. State was Daniel Mitrione, who taught torture techniques in Uruguay. Wikipedia writes on this agent of U.S. foreign policy:
Former Uruguayan police officials and CIA operatives stated Mitrione had taught torture techniques to Uruguayan police in the cellar of his Montevideo home, including the use of electrical shocks delivered to his victims' mouths and genitals.[7] He also helped train foreign police agents in the United States in the context of the Cold War. It has been alleged that he used homeless people for training purposes, who were executed once they had served their purpose.[8]
So CNN's discovery that monstrous characters lurk in the corridors of the CIA is thus nothing new. The only novelity is that CNN, now after half a decade of CIA abuse, chooses to highlight the organization's top officials. The reason for this is not "humanitarian" or some new found zeal within CNN to reveal abuse of "human rights".
No, the reason is solely, to combat Trump. Once he is gone - it will be back to business-as-usual...
U.S. weapons in war crimes
CNN has for decades also declined to expose the realities of U.S. bombardments, whether it be Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan or otherwise. Also the connection beteween the selling/providing of U.S. materials of war like bombs and missiles to actual war crimes, has been something as we - critical of U.S. policies in the service of World-Zionism - in vain have tried to spread information on.
For instance the fact that U.S. missiles, paid for by the American taxpayers, are regularly used by Israel for destroying infrastructure and killing civilians in the Middle East.
As an example U.S. supplied Hellfire missiles were used in Israel's attacks in Lebanon against ambulances(!) and civilian infrastructure (see for instance Israel redirects Hellfire missiles 'after US advice', The Independent, 6 May 2000), ("U.S. corporations complicit in military attacks on Gaza", American Friends Service Committee, "Part III: the CIA and the Pentagon weigh in", Scoop Independent News, 26 April 2008)
Thus it becomes a travesty of justice, when suddenly CNN - of all channels - choses to expose these U.S. crimes with newsreels and high profile articles such as: "Bomb that killed 40 children in Yemen was supplied by the US" (CNN, August 17, 2018)
To begin with, the Saudi Coalition's bombardment of the civilian population in Jemen was not initiated by the Donald Trump régime, but actually initiated during the Barack Obama régime in 2015, with full support of Obama's military top brass.
And the disastrous Cholera epidemic in Yemen that was the direct result of this savage bombardment, started already in October 2016, well before the installation of Trump.
Coup d'états - U.S. supported military coups
Having for years studied the long and terrible history of U.S. interventions in Latin America, and trying to expose them, we have noted that there has always been a policy of downplaying these facts in the Main Stream Media (MSM), that CNN and alikes are part of.
But then, as Donald Trump entered the political scene - lo and behold - now even CNN portrays itself as a critic of these policies and even "reveals" and leaks the most confidential U.S. insider information, that they before never would have done.
See for instance CNN's revelations on U.S. coup plans: "US officials secretly met with Venezuelan military officers plotting a coup against Maduro" (CNN, September 8, 2018)
Usually such pre-coup information on U.S. anti-democratic planning, is completly hushed by CNN and likewise news channels. But now CNN is one of the prime sources for information on U.S. dirty operations!
When it comes to the U.S. policies versus Venezuela one could afterwards see a switch in CNN's approach, where CNN's propaganda became completely aligned with the imperialist agenda of their arch-enemy Donald Trump.
Here CNN very much downplayed the Venezuelan opposition figure Juan Guaidó's hailing of Donald Trump, and when Trump sent a so-called aid package truck caravan to Venezuela's border in 2019, all those interventions where labelled as "U.S." - no mention of "Trump", or "Trump's administration".
This has been seen continously as the trick used by CNN; When dirty U.S. policies happen to coincide with those of the CNN leadership's agenda, they are labelled as "U.S."/"American". When they don't - or have a negative taint - but actually are typical for classic U.S. foreign policy (for us who have observed U.S. harrassments for decades) - the policies are labelled as "Donald Trump's".
So accordingly, the U.S sponsored coup d'état attempt againt the elected Maduro governement in Venezuela on 30th April 2019 - where the agenda of CNN now coincided with that of Trump and his entourage - the de-facto coup aspect of the attempt was completly downplayed.
It was portrayed by CNN as a legitimate uprising that should be supported by the World Community.
The same hypocrisy was seen during the CNN live feed of the coup-attempt in Turkey, July 2016. To be noted, a coup that left more than 300 dead.
It was evident, from the initial information that a coup was unfolding, that CNN hoped the plotters would succeed - even if that went against the will of the Turkish people whose democratically elected government was under attack by the coup plotters.
In the CNN live feed you could even see the Turkish coup military attacking civilians on one of the main highways in Istanbul, just behind the backs of the CNN live-feed commentators/anchors. But no indignation about the unfolding situation, CNN's staff completely ignoring to comment the dramatic pictures that their own live cameras were recording.
The same was seen when the sister channel CNN Türk was assaulted and occupied by the military plotters. The same cold reporting in the CNN live feed, as their own colleagues were under attack! This should be put in relation to how they would have sounded if - for instance - Russian soldiers would have taken over the CNN Moscow office, as an illustrative example.
Even in the aftermath of the coup it was very toned down when it came to reporting on the terrible attacks done on civilians by the putch-militaries; that tanks ran down and killed people on the streets, the dramatic clips where helicopters where firing blindly into bystanders on the ground, and the de facto bombing of the Turkish Parliament and the Presidential Palace. These events were downplayed, if they ever appeared at all.
CNN Türk building cleared by coup soldiers.
Coups are actually not a moral problem for CNN, looking at their coverage of the coups in Bolivia in 2019 against indigenous leader Evo Morales, the military coup in Thailand (2014, preceeded by the assassination of the opposition's "Red General", and the Thai military's slaughter of protesters in central Bangkok including shooting a Western journalist in 2010) - and the bloody coup by General Sisi in Egypt in 2013 (according to the opposition up to 2600 persons killed in Cairo on the 14th August crackdown).
On the latter coup it can be noted that CNN's darling politician, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, has a very hypocritical and highly undemocratic stance; "Kerry Says Egypt’s Military Was ‘Restoring Democracy’ in Ousting Morsi" (The New York Times, August 1, 2013):
Secretary of State John Kerry offered an unexpected lift to Egypt’s military leaders on Thursday, saying they had been “restoring democracy” when they deposed the country’s first freely elected president, Mohamed Morsi, on July 3 after mass demonstrations against his rule.
“The military was asked to intervene by millions and millions of people” who feared the country would descend into chaos, Mr. Kerry said during a visit to Pakistan, a country that has seen four military coups since the 1950s. In Egypt, Mr. Kerry said, “The military did not take over, to the best of our judgment — so far.”
His comments echoed those of Egypt’s defense minister, Gen. Abdul-Fattah el-Sisi, who has said that he repeatedly warned Mr. Morsi to change course and that he was carrying out the people’s will by deposing him. Mr. Kerry’s blunt comments represented the strongest endorsement yet by the United States of the military intervention, which the Obama administration has refused to call a coup.So much for "the forces of good" and democracy...
CNN promoting War Criminals as benefactors of Mankind
CNN's indifference to mass murderers is also seen by the channel on the death of the two interventionist U.S. "hawks"; Senator John McCain and former CIA boss and U.S. President George H. W. Bush.
Sen. McCain, with links to obscure groups in the civil wars in Ukraine and Syria, who himself was shot down while cowardly attacking the Third World country Vietnam, was on the news of his death hailed as an American hero by CNN.
Senator McCain in clandestine visit to Syria meeting with Al Qaeda-infested Syrian "rebels".
McCain with the leader of the Svoboda Party, Ukraine. Note that even the Jews have called this grouping "Nazi". The article "Far-right group at heart of Ukraine protests meet US senator" (channel4.com, 16 December 2013), states:A 1999 report from Tel-Aviv University called the party: “an extremist, right-wing, nationalist organization which emphasizes its identification with the ideology of German National Socialism”.But the hypocrites of CNN never made an issue of this, it was never reported - instead McCain is hailed as a "maverick", a "giant".
CNN's "American hero with a twinkle in his eye", Senator John McCain, singing "Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran"!
The CNN endorsment of War Criminals was also noted on the passing of former U.S. President and CIA boss, George H. W. Bush, the architect behind the 1991 massacre called the "Gulf War".
CNN's Jewish correspondent Jamie Gangel reporting on George H. W. Bush's death, November 2018. All smiling faces.
Bush's Legacy:
Kuwait 1991: The "Highway of Death" where thousands of withdrawing Iraqi soldiers and fleeing civilians were burned alive by the U.S. - courtesy of George H. W. Bush.
The moral morass is also illustrated in the 2016 CNN-held questioning of the U.S. Presidential candidates. There the Republican candidate Ben Carson, was asked - as was it a totally normal question for a country's leader - whether he was ready to slaughter thousands of civilians, for the sake of the U.S.
Read the article/transcript "Hugh Hewitt Questions Ben Carson If He Was Ruthless Enough to Kill Thousands of Innocent Kids in War" (Democracy Now!, December 16, 2015), which introduces the story with the following words:
During Tuesday’s debate, radio host Hugh Hewitt asked Dr. Ben Carson if he was ruthless enough to wage war. “Could you order airstrikes that would kill innocent children by not the scores, but the hundreds and the thousands,” Hewitt asked.
Carson, a neurosurgeon, responded in part, “You have to be able to look at the big picture and understand that it’s actually merciful if you go ahead and finish the job, rather than death by a thousand pricks.” We speak to Zaid Jilani of The Intercept and Bob Herbert, distinguished senior fellow with Demos.
CNN has no problem admitting these architects of mass murder to its studios.Their favourite shabbos goy, Fareed Zakaria, with deep connections to the Council on Foreign Relations, is especially prone to bowing to his Jewish Masters after his plagiarism debacle (as we have noted in our 2013 article: "Fareed Zakaria: CNN´s "experts" on Syria - 4 of 5 are Jewish!").
In Zakaria's show "GPS" on October 7, 2018, he even had the two prime butchers of Iraq as his main guests, the Jewess Madeleine Albright, former U.S. Secretary of State during the starvation campaign against that Arab country, and Colin Powell, who was deeply involved in the 2003 Iraq invasion and ensuing occupation.
We here rerun some transcripts from the CNN show:
CNN's Fareed Zakaria in his introductory note:"I am honored to have joining me now the 64th and 65th Secretaries of States of the United States", Madeleine Albright and Colin Powell.
Albright to Zakaria:"First of all I want to congratulate you on your anniversary [GPS show 10 years anniversary]" [...]"you have done so much to educate your viewers, [...] thank you very much."
Powell to Zakaria:"First of all let me also offer my congratulations on your ten years of service [GPS show 10 years anniversary], really has been service. You are a real treat to watch on cable television these days [...], so congratulations to you!"
From the tone between them, from all the pleasantries dropped, one understands that it is just a chit-chat between friends, from the same ideological camp
.
CNN plays the "conspiracies" vs "conspiracy theories" game, as it suits them
CNN lists Trump's "conspiracy theories" (see: "CNN anchor lists the conspiracy theories Trump has pushed", CNN, 2019/08/11)
The new method of surpressing freedom of thought, is to denounce anything contrary to the official, politcized, version, as a "conspiracy theory".
This method did not exist during the most heated debates of the Cold War, between the Left and Right - between the pro-Soviet and pro-U.S. camps. In those days debates could be done between differing parties, using the classic pro- and contra argumentation technique.
But today, muffling dissent by denouncing them as "conspiracy theories", is the latest Stalinist fashion.
It is a most unintellectual approach.
As a small reminder, remember the words of the wise Irishman, George Bernard Shaw:
"All great truths begin as blasphemies."
CNN now runs the most advanced conspiracy theories 24/7, concerning for instance Russian foreign politics, the purported actions of so-called Islamic radicals, of "White Supremacists" - to name the favourite CNN/MSM themes - seeing and reporting the most farfetched designs by evildoers, designs that these medias see behind the most ordinary news events.
The level of paranoia and childish deductions these "channels of truth" convey are laughable, behind every bush there is some Putin or "Nazi" or "Islamist" plot, it is as in the good ol' McCarthy times - total paranoia. But of course this paranoia is not innocent or without intent. It has a special purpose, the purpose to sow fear - the best incitament for implementing the decrees of the powerful unto the indoctrinated masses.
The hypocrisy is total, as the very same CNN that detects the most laughable conspiracies in their adversaries' nests, itself rebutts anything that implies that CNN and the people that adhere to its political propaganda/"information"/infotainment - are actually orchestrating political campaigns - as wild "conspiracy theories"!
Here some short examples.
On 2nd November 2019, CNN ran the following headline: "Trump using conspiracy theories to engergize his base"
Here the dirty "c-t"-word used to discredit CNN's political enemy.
CNN: "Trump repeats Ukraine conspiracy theory...", aired November 2019.
In his show aired CNN December 3rd 2019, CNN anchor Don Lemon blasted Donald Trump-"peddled" "conspiracy theories".
Then in the same show also denouncing a Trumpian "conspiracy": "Is this report essentially saying there was a conspiracy at the highest levels of [Trump's] government?"
The hypocrisy gets even worse during Jewish Professor of Law, Jessica Levinson's participation in CNN, aired November 30, 2018.
Jessica Levinson, Professor of Law, Loyola Law School.
In the CNN program she insinuates about Trump: "[...] did the Trump campaign have a conspiracy or an agreement with the Russian government to try to interfere with the 2016 election?"She also says: "If Mueller can draw the line, that's when we have some sort of not collusion as you and I have talked about but some sort of conspiracy to interfere with the 2016 election."
So a lot of talk about conspiracies, insinuations that conspiracies are not just a theory, but that they actually happen.
But in the very same show Levinson also complains about "peddlers in conspiracy theories and other untruths".
So when the information doesn't suit her, it is denounced as a "conspiracy theory"!
CNN lamenting death of a racist Chief Rabbi as it was a U.S. day of National Sorrow
In 2013 Israel's Sephardic Chief Rabbi, Ovadia Yosef, died.
Seeing the CNN live feed from Israel, when the news of Ovadia's death broke, was as if a major leader - a U.S. leader - had died!
CNN's live feed on rabbi Ovadia Yosef's death.
This reveals the level of rot, the level of Israelization of U.S. civil society. Already in the Israeli Ma'ariv article "The Jews Who Run Clinton's Court" from 1994, it was noted:The U.S. has no longer a government of Goyim [Gentiles], but an administration in which the Jews are full partners in the decision making at all levels. Perhaps the aspects of the Jewish religious law connected with the term 'government of goyim' should be re-examined, since it is an outdated term in the U.S.
And one of the examples given in the Ma'ariv article was when the Israeli journalist Avinoam Bar-Yosef phoned the U.S. State Department:
I phoned the State Department and requested a briefing from the person in charge of that area. They referred me to Yehuda Mirsky. I introduced myself to his secretary. Suddenly someone picked up the receiver and then t heard a voice saying in perfect Israeli Hebrew: "Good morning, how can I help you?" For a moment I thought that I had mistakenly dialed the Israeli Foreign Ministry. "Where do you know Hebrew from, and are you an Israeli?" "No, I am American, but I spent three years, mainly studying the bible and the Talmud, at the military "Har Etzion" Hesder Yeshiva, with Rabbi Lichtenstein and Rabbi Amital in Gush Etzion." Mirsky, like Kurtzer, belongs to the professional of the American foreign service.
So already in 1994 it had gotten to the point that Hebrew was spoken in the official phones of the U.S. Government.
Now a Jewish rabbi, in a foreign country - "Israel" - has died, and CNN switches to live feed, "Breaking News"... as if the President himself had passed away.
It's even more upsetting when you know the value systems this Chief Rabbi stood for.CNN pretends to be against xenophobia, against racism. But the extreme racism of this rabbi, CNN, where is your reporting?
Ovadia Yosef has earned fame for blatent outrageous statements on the need to "annihilate" Arabs, and that non-Jews, Gentiles, exist only to serve Jews: “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world – only to serve the People of Israel.” (see article)
And he also saw the Hurricane Katrina as divine punishment for godlessness and American support for the disengagement of Israel from Gaza ("Rabbi: Hurricane punishment for pullout" (YNetNews, 09.07.05):
There was a tsunami and there are terrible natural disasters, because there isn’t enough Torah study… Black people reside there [New Orleans]. Blacks will study the Torah? [God said] let’s bring a tsunami and drown them.I should be noted that the son of Yosef, rabbi Yitzhak Yosef, is the present Sephardic Chief Rabbi of Israel.
He continues in the same vein as his father, echoing Judaism's contempt for the rest of Mankind (that is the people not included in the gang of the Chosen). In 2018 Chief Rabbi Yitzhak Yosef was quoted stating that Blacks are monkeys! (See The Times of Israel, 20 March 2018.)
It will be interesting to see CNN's live feed when this Jewish racist passes away.
More on Jewish media influence in the U.S. and Worldwide
- CNN's Jewish version of "diversity"
Lists the main Jewish agents at CNN.
- New Head of CNN, Zucker, Gives Glimpse of Inordinate Jewish Influence in Media
By David Duke, 2012. On the Jew Jeff Zucker becoming president over CNN Worldwide.
- CNN news fakes
The masters of "Fake News"!
