The Lobby and the Israeli Invasion of Lebanon:
Their Facts and Ours
By James Petras
www.dissidentvoice.org, August 29, 2006
All the national, state and local Jewish organizations have launched
a $300 million fundraising and propaganda campaign in support of the
21 Jewish civilians and 116 soldiers killed during the Israeli
invasion of Lebanon (but not the 18 Israeli Arabs who were excluded
from Jews-only bomb shelters). As adjuncts of the Israeli foreign
office not a single one of the 52 organizations which make up The
Presidents of the Major Jewish Organizations in the US voiced a
single public criticism of Israel’s massive destruction of civilian
homes, hospitals, offices, supermarkets, refugee convoys and
churches and mosques, and the deliberate killing of civilians, UN
peacekeepers and rescue workers with precision bombing. On the
contrary the entire Jewish lobby echoed in precise detail the
Israeli lies that the Lebanese deaths were caused by the Lebanese
resistance’s “use of human shields,” despite the total devastation
of the heavily populated southern suburbs of Beirut, completely out
of range of any Hezbollah rockets.
The magnitude of the Jewish Lobby’s cover-up of Israel’s massive
military assault can be measured in great detail.
The Israeli Armed Forces (IDF) launched 5,000 missiles, five-ton
bunker-buster bombs and cluster bombs as well as anti-personnel
phosphorus bombs each day into Lebanon for 27 days -- totaling over
135,000 missiles, bombs and artillery shells. During the last seven
days of the war Israel launched 6,000 bombs and shells per day --
over 42,000, for a grand total of 177,000 over a heavily populated
territory the size of the smallest state in the US. In contrast, the
Lebanese national resistance launched 4,000 rockets during the
entire 34-day period, an average of 118 per day. The ratio was 44 to
1 -- without mentioning the size differentials, the long-term
killing effects of the thousands of un-exploded cluster bombs
(nearly 50 killed or maimed since the end of hostilities) and
Israel’s scorched earth military incursion.
The Jewish lobbyists publish the number of Israel’s civilian dead as
41, forgetting to mention that only 23 were Jews, the remaining 18
were members of Israel’s Arab Muslim and Christian minority who
constitute around 20% of the population. The disproportionate number
of Israeli Arabs killed was a result of the Israeli government
policy of providing shelters and siren warning systems to Jews and
ignoring the security needs of its Arab citizens. The proportion of
civilian deaths to soldiers was 41 to 116 or 26% of the total
Israeli dead (but if we only consider Jewish Israelis and IDF
members the proportion 23 to 116 or 16% of the Jewish dead were
civilian.) Clearly the Lebanese resistance was aiming most of its
fire at the invading IDF. In contrast, in Lebanon, of the 1,181 so
far known to have been killed, 1088 were civilians and only 93 were
fighters. In other words 92% of the Lebanese dead were civilians --
over three times the rate of civilians killed by the Lebanese
resistance and almost six times the rate of Jewish civilians killed
(the only ones who count in the Lobby’s propaganda machine). To put
it more bluntly: over 47 Lebanese civilians were slaughtered for
each Jewish Israeli civilian death.
The Jewish Lobby’s claims of Israeli moral and military superiority
in the Middle East -- which is paradoxically combined with warnings
that Israel’s survival is at stake -- has been shredded to tatters
as a result of their failure to annihilate Hezbollah.
The Lobby’s echoing Israeli military claims of the invincibility of
the Israeli armed forces is largely based on their ‘fighting’
against rock throwing Palestinian school kids. Today it is clear
that they are quite vulnerable when faced with well-armed, veteran
Lebanese guerrilla fighters. According to a United Nation Report,
from June 26 to August 26, 2006, Israel killed 202 Palestinians, 44
of whom were small children, while losing one soldier; while in
Lebanon, Israel lost 116 soldiers to 93 Lebanese fighters in 34 days
(almost half the time period). In other words, 157 times more
Israeli’s were killed as a result of the Lebanese invasion in one
month than died in Palestine in two months (United Nations Office
for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, August 26, 2006). The
Jewish Lobby’s propaganda campaign in the US Congress, throughout
the mass media and even in our small communities in defense of
Israel’s “Summer Rain” (raining bombs on civilians) against the
Palestinians has been thoroughly exposed as a murderous scorched
earth policy by the United Nations report and summarized in the
Israeli daily Haaretz (August 27, 2006): “The [campaign] . . . is
still taking a severe toll on 1.4 million Palestinians . . .
thousands of Palestinians have been forced to flee their homes
following continuing IDF incursions into the Strip (Gaza) and heavy
shelling . . . the Israeli Air Force has conducted 247 aerial
assaults in Gaza…more than a million people have been left with no
regular supply of water and electricity.” The Lobby, like skilled
totalitarians, reverses the roles calling the Palestinian victims
(all 202 of them) terrorists and the executioners (the Israeli
Defense Force) victims (one dead soldier who was most likely killed
by ‘friendly fire’).
George Orwell would have written a scathing essay on the Lobby’s
version of Israel’s Animal Farm where one Israeli death is worth
more than 202 Palestinians.
In surveying the Daily Alert, the propaganda sheet prepared by the
Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (a semi-official propaganda arm
of the Israeli regime) for the Conference of Presidents of Major
America Jewish Organizations (CPMAJO), there is not a single mention
of the fact that the Jewish state was killing almost 10 Lebanese
civilians for each fighter, while the Hezbollah resistance was
killing four times as many Israeli soldiers as Israeli civilians
(Jews and Gentiles). Not a single opinion article, editorial or
commentary reproduced by the Daily Alert, from the Wall Street
Journal, Washington Post, The National Telegraph, the New York Sun,
USA Today, Boston Globe, New York Times, Haaretz, The Jerusalem Post
or The Times (UK) mentions the fact that Israel’s much ballyhooed
“precision” bombing succeeded in targeting civilians, while the
Lebanese defenders’ far less sophisticated weaponry mainly hit IDF
invaders.
These omissions by the Jewish Lobby and its members and supporters
in the Anglo-American-Israeli respectable and yellow press and
electronic media were absolutely necessary to perpetuate the myth
the Israel was waging a “defensive”, “existential” (sic) war for
“survival” against Islamic “terrorists” embodied in Hezbollah and
the Lebanese National Resistance.
Was Israel’s destruction of 15,000 homes up to Beirut and beyond to
Northern Lebanon defensive actions as the CPMAJO claims? Do these
very smart, very wealthy, highly educated Princeton, Yale, Harvard,
Hopkins and Chicago-educated apologists for the Israeli invasion
really believe that bombing hospitals, supermarkets, water
treatments plants, churches and mosques in Southern Lebanon, oil
refineries and milk, food and pharmaceutical factories in Beirut,
transport, highways and bridges in Northern Lebanon were
“existential” acts essential for the survival of the “Jewish State”?
Can’t they understand the simple math presented above? The math of
genocide? Do the investment bankers, professors, dentists and armies
of rabbis of all Talmudic readings believe that Israel is the
innocent victim of aggression -- justifying the slaughter of over
90% Lebanese civilians among those it killed? Such well-educated
professionals must know that from January 1996 to August 2006, there
were weekly incidents all along the Israeli-Lebanese border,
involving Israeli raids, killings and kidnapping of Lebanese
civilians, as well as rocket firing in both directions. Didn’t the
Hollywood moguls who gave so generously to the Israeli war machine
know that Elliott Abrams, President Bush’s chief adviser on the
Middle East (stern defender of Jewish purity and intimate
collaborator with the Israeli high command) gave full support in
early summer to an Israeli plan to destroy Hezbollah, at least one
month before the border incident (see Seymour Hersh, “Watching
Lebanon,” The New Yorker, August 21, 2006)?
Of course the educated elites know all about the Israeli lust for
power and dominance --unlike the good Germans in the 1940s, who
claimed they didn’t see the smoking chimneys or the grim trains --
as today images of devastated apartments and slaughtered children
were visible, easily accessible and followed by well-publicized
reports by all the human rights groups on Israel’s crimes against
humanity. They knew and supported Israel’s crimes before and after
the ceasefire -- and they proudly chose to endorse the war, the
policies and the state as true accomplices after the fact.
Yet the Jewish Lobby tells us that Hezbollah’s kidnapping of two
soldiers across the Israeli border was the detonator for a
full-scale invasion. Numerous sources around the world even dispute
the Israeli account of a Hezbollah cross-border attack. According to
the big business US magazine Forbes (July 12, 2006), the French news
service AFP (July 12, 2006), the respectable Asia Times (July 15,
2006) and the Lebanese police, the Israeli soldiers were captured
within Lebanon in the area of Ai’tu Al-Chaarb, a Lebanese village a
few kilometers from the Israeli border.
While the Jewish lobby raises funds exclusively for Israeli-Jewish
soldiers and civilians, Hezbollah is engaged in a non-sectarian
reconstruction program that embraces all Lebanese communities and
households, regardless of religious or ethnic preferences. The
reason is found in the fact that the Lebanese resistance was a
national movement. Contrary to the Lobby’s propaganda, the Lebanese
resistance was not exclusively Shia or even Muslim in make-up.
Israel’s invasion managed to united Lebanon’s factions in defense of
their homeland. Of the 93 Lebanese fighters killed, 20% were from
organizations other than Hezbollah, a point ignored by the Lobby’s
ideologues, who pursue Israel’s policy of pushing the US to attack
Iran, Syria and other Middle East states known to be hostile to
Israel’s hegemonic ambitions.
Consequences of Israeli War
In both Israel and throughout the pro-Israel Jewish networks, the
Israeli military’s failure to achieve its goal of defeating and
eliminating the Lebanese resistance, particularly Hezbollah, has had
a major impact. In Israel, the major criticism of the Olmert-Perez
regime and General Halutz from both soldiers and civilians is that
the government was too weak -- there was insufficient bombing, lack
of sufficient ground troops and too much concern for Lebanese
civilians. The cease-fire, they complained, was premature; the
territory occupied was too limited. Likud and other parties in the
Knesset called for the bombing of Syria and Iran.
While many US and Israeli progressives cited the “turmoil”,
“dissent” and harsh polemics in the aftermath of the war as typical
of the “rough and tumble” of Israel’s democracy, they ignored the
savage militarist substance and ultra-rightwing direction of Israeli
public opinion. The “who lost the war” polemics in Israel is
basically anchored in preparations for a new, more violent attack on
Lebanon and other adversaries of Israel.
This militaristic rage is manifested in the brutal daily assaults on
the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank where Israeli warplanes
bomb homes and ground forces assassinate and injure dozens of
civilians – “existential” murders against stone-throwing schoolboys.
Israel’s rage has affected Jewish religious notables. The Rabbinical
Council of America called for the Israeli military to re-evaluate
its military rules of war in light of Hezbollah’s “unconscionable
use of civilians, hospitals, ambulances, mosques and the like as
human shields,” according to the Jerusalem Post (August 21, 2006).
The RCA and the modern Orthodox women’s organization, Eminah,
represent over one million US Jews. Their call to maximize civilian
deaths in order to lessen the “risk” to “our” (Israeli Jewish)
soldiers is in the finest spirit of Nazi chaplains egging on the
Wehrmacht’s scorched earth policy during World War II. Their Israeli
counterparts, Rabbis Eliyahu and Drori, echoed the RCA’s “delicate
criticisms” in more colorful and uninhibited terms: “Our corrupt
military, which tells us that our soldiers must endanger their lives
to protect enemy civilians, is the reason we lost the war,”
according to the gentle Rabbi Eliyahu, who sees all non-Jewish
civilians opposing Israeli policy as enemies worthy of incineration.
Not to be outdone, the good Rabbi Drori accused the rest of Western
humanity of being “anti-Semites” for being horrified at Israel’s
savage destruction. “Anti-Semites demand that we use Christian
morality while our enemies act like barbarians.” (Jerusalem Post,
August 21, 2006) Apparently the killing and maiming of over a
thousand Lebanese civilians, mostly women and children, does not
satisfy this raging bull Rabbi.
Lest one think that these US and Israeli Rabbis are simply loose
cannons or isolated psychopaths, three weeks earlier one Rabbi Dov
Lior, in the name of the Yesh Council of Rabbis (with hundreds of
thousands of Israeli followers), announced that “when our enemies
hold a baby in one hand and shoot us with the other, or when
missiles are purposely aimed at civilian populations in the Land of
Israel in blatant disregard for moral criteria, we are obligated to
act according to Jewish morality, which dictates that ‘he who gets
up to kill you, get up yourself and kill him first.’” (Jerusalem
Post, August 25, 2006) The holy men of the Holy Land are providing a
post-factum religious blessing for the more than three hundred
Lebanese children killed and urging the future killing of even more
children. All this, we are told, is according to “Jewish morality.”
Surely many US Jews, especially liberals and even conservatives,
object to rabbinical fiats for the slaughter of children, but we are
deafened by their polite silence. The Lobby conveniently ignores the
Jewish morality spiel, even as it defends the “moderate” secular
line of Israeli civilian deaths resulting from Hezbollah using
Lebanese babies and old grannies as shields to commit their crimes.
So we have a raging debate among US and Israeli rabbis, and secular
and religious apologists over whether killing Lebanese civilians and
children is based on tactical military or religious-ethical
considerations.
The Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee, David A.
Harris, puts to the lie the nasty bit of propaganda by US “Left”
Zionists who downplay the role of the Jewish Lobby in securing
whole-hearted US White House and Congressional support for Israel’s
destruction of Lebanon. In discussing US subservience to Israel,
Harris stated, “No other nation has been prepared to define such an
intimate relationship with Israel in all bilateral spheres -- from
arms sales, foreign aid and intelligence-sharing to a free-trade
zone, scientific co-operation and diplomatic support. No other
nation has the capacity, by dint of its size and stature, to help
ensure Israel’s quest for a secure and lasting peace ]sic] . . . In
the recent conflict with Hezbollah, once again the United States
demonstrated its willingness to stand by Israel, provide vital
support and withstand the pressure of many US allies who would have
wished for an earlier end to the fighting even if it meant keeping
Hezbollah largely intact and in place . . . Whatever the primary
factor, there can be no doubt that American Jewry is an essential
element of the equation (yoking the US to Israel). This is all the
more reason why American Jewry need to work day in and day out to
ensure that the mutually beneficial link [sic] goes from strength to
strength.” (Jerusalem Post, August 25, 2006)
In plain English, the Jewish networks and lobbies were able to
secure 98 percent support from Congress for a resolution supporting
Israel’s invasion of Lebanon, even as 54 percent of Democrats and 39
percent of Republicans favor a policy of neutrality as opposed to
alignment with Israel. (Times-Bloomberg Poll, July 25-August 1,
2006, published in the Jewish Telegraph Agency -- August 15, 2006)
The Lobby convinced, pressured and threatened the White House to
prolong the Israeli terror bombing as Harris so proudly announced.
The Jewish Lobby does work “day in and day out” to make sure that
Israel can ethnically cleanse Palestine, drop five-ton bombs on
Lebanese apartment buildings, bulldoze villages and isolate the US
from even its closest allies at the expense of the US taxpayers, our
democratic ideals and our sovereignty. And the American Jewish
Committee has the chutzpah (arrogance) to say that it is “our
mutually beneficial link.” Now that is a bit of political
dishonesty!
James Petras, a former Professor of Sociology at Binghamton
University, New York, owns a 50-year membership in the class
struggle, is an adviser to the landless and jobless in Brazil and
Argentina, and is co-author of
Globalization Unmasked
(Zed Books). His latest book is,
The Power of Israel in the United States
(Clarity Press, 2006). He can be reached at:
jpetras@binghamton.edu.
