| |
[Information about a Jewish criminal was received with the following
commentary:]
Guess where? Guess who? No prizes. p.s. You guys need to get yourself
a PGP, or GnuPG key, and publish it on your website. Sensitive information
may find its way to you if secrecy, and anonymity, can be guaranteed.
Keep up the good work.
I love your site as for the topics it enhances. I was in quest of a site
being critical of Jewish supremacism without falling into the trap of
Holocaust-denial or of the infamous Protocols, and I found one, at last.
I was in quest of a site being critical of Jewish supremacism without
falling into an extremist right-wing or left-wing movement, and I found
a point of view which seems to me not only middle-of-the-road, but animated
by something like a humanistic-Christian stance. First of all, I would
like to know more about the authors of the site and how to relate to them
via Internet or otherwise. I want to get in touch with them personnally,
in order to proceed to a positive exchange of views. I see that your site
is not complete yet, the contraptions to reach the authors not being working
presently. First of all, I would like such a site to be accompanied by
a disciplined forum of discussion, where mere insulting would be banned,
but intelligent criticism welcomed. I would like such a site to present
also the non-supremacist various jewish points of view that are extant
in the world and throughout history. I am myself a student of Kabbalah,
I received a jewish-style education from my mother, and I manage to weed
out my heritage so to speak of its parasitical elements to keep the gist
of my cultural heritage. In true Kabbalistic teaching, there is no place
for tribal supremacism. The difference between Jews and non-Jews is just
a symbol for another difference, that between "soulful" and soulless persons,
which is real. Jewish tribal supremacism is mere smoke, but there is no
smoke without fire. I have plenty of ideas to make such a site even richer.
The reason why I am so much interested is my concern about religious intolerance
in general, when such or such Christian denomination says that out of
its frame of reference there is no salvation, and I was forced to admit
that the Jewish thing started the ball so to speak. It is of no use for
the Catholic church to apologise for having been anti-semitic in the past
when the Jewish establishment does not make any move in the same direction
towards Christianity. What I would like such a site to harbour is an on-line
copy of the Talmud, that would be free of access both to Jewish scholars
(I found no Inteernet site offering one for free) and to non-Jewish ones.
Thanks in advance.
Hi, I scanned your links for MEMRI, The Middle East Research Institute,
and couldn't find it, so I thought I'd alert you to it. It was on the
CBS news tonight. A female Jewish student at Harvard is pressuring the
university to sever whatever connection they may have with them. The good
part is that the folks who watched CBS tonight are now aware of MEMRI's
existence. http://memri.org/ A search on Jewish turns up a number of interesting
articles including the one below. I also want to thank you for the great
service you have performed for those who have an open and inquiring mind.
This Week's Jewish News is too good to be true. I was looking tonight
for some background on the Hitler miniseries, and there it was. Some of
the articles are perfect for lists where the list members are in need
of a different viewpoint on some of these issues. Your site seems to be
down more often than the norm, so I am assuming that it has been the subject
of numerous attacks. Thanks again. (BL) http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=ia&ID=IA9502
MEMRI
I tried to forward a congratulatory message a few days ago, but since
I do not see it in your guestbook, I doubt that you've received it. Here
is my story. I operate a convenience store in Canada. The store sells
the four standard daily newspapers to be found in this region (two ''national''
and two ''regional'' publications). Of these newspapers, one is a populist
rag that bases its overt pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian bias on Hebraic
biblical accounts; another, the National Post, is co-owned by Conrad Black
(Zionist Gentile) and Izzy Asper (Zionist Jew) and promotes the Bush administration's
stance on Israel and the Middle-East; a third one is a mediocre publication
of Izzy Asper's (Izzy forbids his columnists to be critical of Israel);
finally, the fourth paper and, in my view, the only one worthy of such
a name, is the Globe and Mail, whose editor-in-chief, Edward Greenspon
is - you guessed it - Jewish. As a secular Gentile, I deplore a complete
absence, in the Canadian public discourse, of voices critical of Abrahamic
religions in general and of Judaism in particular. Jewish particularism
is assimilated to secular universalism; concerns about such particularism
are dismissed as expressions of bias. Critics of Israel are depicted as
lunatics by three of the four publications mentioned above - when and
if they are mentioned at all. I found your site two years ago and I feel
it prompts questions that are not only taboo in the present cultural paradigm,
but which I never dared ask myself in the first place. Your challenge
of the thought police is admirable and I wish you the best of luck in
this endeavour. (KB)
* Thanks for the nice note. But it'll take more
than "luck" to get things cooking about this subject. Please pass the
word and help create the chain of discussion that is necessary to put
these issues on the public table.
Hello. You may have heard of the 'Stakeknife' affair that is dominating
British and Irish newspapers (and websites). The apparent 'unmasking of
a spy' inside the IRA has a number of interesting details. It is my belief
that Alfredo Scappaticci's name was leaked to the press by Samuel Rosenfeld
and Kevin Fulton, in order to smear Scappaticci and divert attention from
the real 'Stakeknife'. Rosenfeld and co had a grudge against the Ministry
of Defence and threatened to expose Stakeknife. It seems that instead
of exposing Stakeknife, they have come to an agreement to name an innocent
party (who may end up being killed by the IRA for his 'crime'). I'm guessing
that Rosenfeld and co have been paid by the MoD for their services, therefore
profiting from putting an innocent man in danger. If you do a google on
these names you can get the other details of the case. (KB)
Ironically enough, the Jewish philosopher Hannah Arendt in her book
Eichmann in Jerusalem (1965), courageously points out that 'Israeli
citizens, religious and nonreligious, seem agreed upon the desirability
of having a law which prohibits intermarriage.. They are also agreed
upon the undesirability of a written constitution in which such a law
would embarrassingly have to be spelled out.. There certainly was something
breathtaking in the naïveté with which the prosecution (in the Eichmann
trial) denounced the infamous Nuremberg Laws of 1935, which had prohibited
intermarriage and sexual intercourse between Jews and Germans. The better
informed among the correspondents were well aware of the irony, but
they did not mention it in their reports. This was not the time to tell
the Jews what was wrong with the laws and institutions of their own
country.' (p 7). In other words, there is the extreme irony that the
Nuremberg Laws were 'infamous', but that the legal impediments in Israel
with the same objective were (are, even today) never 'infamous'. 'From
the first (in Israel), the diverse religious sects were kept separate
and segregated by the prohibition of civil marriage.' (Maxim Ghilan,
How Israel Lost its Soul (1974), p 165-6). Exclusionary mechanisms have
a dual connotation: when Jews practice them, they are neutral, when
others such as Germans do, they are so Evil that our hair stands on
end and we literally shiver with the feeling of overwhelming bilious
nausea... (CD)
Dear Webmaster, If you are a gentile, it's unfortunate that you have
been deceived and presented with such a deliberately skewed picture
of how Jews view themselves and the nations of the world. If you are
looking for how authentic Judaism and the Torah really thinks, then
ask some authentic Jews, not the imposters quoted within this website.
If you are a Jew, shame on you. (LL)
* Dear "Authentic Jew," thank you for
your comments. Gosh, a REAL Jew (not a fake one) is taking the time
to email us. We are honored. Can we come over and mow your lawn on the
Sabbath? If you know anyone printing T-shirts that repeat your refrain
IF YOU ARE A JEW, SHAME ON YOU, where might I buy one? Perhaps you are
sending them out free, as a community sevice?
Your website is great - presumably you also have Tom Wolfe's book The
Painted Word (1975) which details how 3 New York jewish 'art critics',
Clement Greenberg, Harold Rosenberg and Leo Steinberg, determined the
course of US modern art in the 1950's to 1960's. (JB)
First off, let me be clear -- you're obviously a bigot, obsessed with
Jews to an insane degree. (For instance, who knew, and really cares, that
both the top NBA agent and commissioner are Jewish? How exactly would
a dispute between them have any effect at all on the alleged Jewish control
of the world?) But that's not why I'm writing, for surely there are not
a few people who are Jew-haters in the world. I just want to ask a very
simple question. You claim not to be a Jew-hater but a simply against
collective rather than individual pursuits of liberty. Why, then, do you
support the Palestinians? It is a movement purely inspired by collective,
rather than individual, grievances, and could reasonably expected to provide
for FEWER individual liberties than Israel has, as is the case with every
single other Arab country in the world. For example, I see no discussion
of the Arab and Palestinian phenomenon of honor killings. Why not if you're
such a great advocate of universality? (Steven Goldstein)
* Mr. Goldstein, this entire web site is about guys
like you, whose bigotry, blindness, dual standards of morality, allegiance
to racist Israel, hypocrisy, etc. are the problems. The Palestinians do
not control so enormously much in pursuit of their chauvinist and ethnocentric
interests. And their cause of human dignity and independence from the
Jewish/Israeli yoke is just. Morally speaking, Israel is the nationalist
fraud of the century. And you are obviously part of it. If you want to
see discussions about Arab "honor killings" and information
on the fur length of the Australian kangaroo, start your own web site.
I remember you talking about Lieberman, well, we are also about to have
here a jew president.He is called Kirchner and will elected next weekend,
thanks to the support of all media, that made all what they could just
for achieving this. And the worst thing of all is that media is hiding
this fact, that´s why most people ignore it.This doesn´t suprise me at
all, they want to have the control of my country, your country, and who
knows what they are planning for the future.I have been reading your page.
Good Job!
(AB - from Argentina)
Media Analysis: If you go to the News option under Google and check all
news stories of this incident, Goldstein's ethnoreligious identity is
never mentioned except in the last line of the version of the story included
below, although virtually all acounts are based on the same AP Dispatch
which probably included the information. Goldstein is described as either
a "Tampa podiatrist," a "Tampa man" or a "man"--but never a "Jewish terrorist,"
a "Jew," or a "Jewish podiatrst." Contrast this with the usual headlines
reserved for White suspects: "White supremacist," "White separatist,"
"neo-Nazi," etc. Note also the attempt at rationalization: Goldstein wanted
"to avenge the 2001 terrorist attacks." The [British] Guardian included
the following comment: "Ahmed Bedier, a spokesman for the Council for
American-Islamic Relations who worships at the Pinellas County mosque,
said Goldstein deserves a longer sentence." ``It's nowhere enough for
the damage he intended to do,'' Bedier said. ``If it was a Muslim in his
place, he would probably never come out of jail. This was attempted murder.''
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uslatest/story/0,1282,-2532256,00.html
Re: how the neocons got to Cheney, I don't know the whole story. I.
Lewis Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, apparently played an important
role. This was a point made by Joseph Cirincione of the Carnegie Endowment
for International Peace in an interview on NPR that I happened to hear.
(http://www.ceip.org/files/about/Staff.asp?r=10 ) Cirincione stressed
the role of Libby in getting a pre-existing network of neo-cons appointed
at sub-cabinet positions in the departments of Defense and State. Libby
is a Jew with a long history of involvement in Zionist causes and neocon
thinktanks. (He was also Marc Rich's lawyer in the pardon scandal at
the end of the Clinton Administration.) There is no question that all
of the people involved in the neocon "cabal" have long-term professional
and personal ties. There was a sort of musical chairs thing where they
worked for each other, etc.; they had a pre-existing point of view and
they gradually shaped policy in their direction. But the reality is
that Cheney already had a history of association with neocon think tanks,
including the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and the
Project for a New American Century. Rumsfeld was also a member of PNAC
along with all the prominent Jewish neocons. In other words, Cheney
was already known to be on board with the neocon agenda, so it's not
as if Libby accomplished what he did by stealth. If there was any stealth
involved, it was probably in selling this program to Bush. Michael Lind
is undoubtedly right in emphasizing Bush's lack of experience and intelligence,
and perhaps his involvement with Zionist Christianity. I suspect that
people like Cheney and Rumsfeld wanted to maintain their ties to conservative,
Republican-oriented foreign policy groups and by the time of the Clinton
years, the neocons were the only game in town, or at least the most
important game. Certainly being part of the Republican Foreign and Defense
policy establishment would be seen as a great career move for people
who wanted to return to power. By the time Bush was elected, the neocons
had the whole infrastructure in place--the think tanks, the activist
organizations (including AIPAC), and the media (Weekly Standard, Fox
News, etc.) On the other hand, people like Brent Scowcroft who had dominated
foreign policy in the Bush I administration had not established the
same sort of power base to ease their way back into power. I remember
at the time of the election thinking that with the appointment of Cheney
as VP, Bush II would be a rerun of Bush I, but obviously I wasn't looking
at the people Cheney was hanging out with. I think the whole thing is
a testimony of how Jewish movements are able to recruit important non-Jews,
often as the most visible and public spokespeople. This has happened
repeatedly in Jewish movements. (LC)
Your website is categorized as 'hate speech' by Cyber Patrol. You should
complain to them, although this company has ties with the ADL or at
least it accept their suggestions when it comes to "hate speech", so
your chances of removing JTR from their "hate" category are slim. CyberPatrol
is apparently used by many public librairies and schools. http://mtas.surfcontrol.com/mtas/CP6TAS.asp
* More about Jewish censorial totalitarianism
here. Peacefire's monitoring of Cyber
Patrol censorship is here.
As far as Jewish lobby's war against us, let me add that untill recently
the US had never had any problem with Saddam Hussein to begin with.We
can go back to 1983 and 1984 in the heat of Iraq-Iran war and see a
cozy relationship being cultivated between the two states. The main
target of this war has been and is Iran. It all started when the revolution
caught the Israelis by surprise, replaced the Israeli embassy in Tehran
with the Palastinian Embassy,formed,armed and trained Hizbullah militia
in Lebanon which brought the most humiliating defeat for the Israelis
in south Lebanon,a nightmare they never bagained for, when they invaded
Lebanon in 1983.
(JJ, in Iran)
"Simply put another way, if all the world is a stage, then the Jews
- and especially those in the Land of Israel - are the lead actors on
the stage of history, and the goyim - the nations, i.e. the gentiles -
have supporting roles, while the evil-doers are props and background scenery.
As our tradition states, G-D - the great playwright - created the world
for the sake of the Jewish People, and it is our responsibility to implement
the Torah - absolute morality and the blueprint of creation - in it."
This is an excerpt from an article that appeared in
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/article.php3?id=2125
It would be helpful if a Search engine was added. One could use it
to track down individual details. For example I couldn't find anything
on Eliot Cohen( Johns Hopkins Univ. I believe) who appears regularly
on the Jewish-controlled U.S. TV networks to engage in Muslim and Arab
bashing. (SS)
Jews have achieved a great deal in America and have risen to the top
of American society despite great obstacles. What is your point? Jews
are in great positions of power, but why do you feel that is so significant
to point out. The anti-semetic nature of this site is so clearly evident
and your overt jealosy of the success that Jews have attained through
hard work is quite clear. Quite pathetic in my Jewish opinion. (JS)
* Strangely, this kind of comment about "jealousy"
is stock-in-trade in the Jewish community. Call frankness about Jewish
dominance in so many fields whatever you want, but we call it the result
of chronic injustice, hypocrisy, exploitation, hustling as a virtual
religion, chutzpah galore, ethnocentric networking, and a Judeocentric
pyramid scheme -- and we're just getting warmed up.
Hi, I see that you carry a link to the “web site of Brooklyn-born Joseph
Cohen, former chassid, now Yousef al Khattab, a Muslim in Palestine.”
I don’t know you personally, but I am acquainted with your Mr. “Cohen”
– a name he took after moving to Brooklyn from the wilds of southern New
Jersey where he was actually born and raised. Just between us, Mr. “Cohen”
is a ne’er-do-well who could never hold down a job, and is chronically
incapable of supporting his family. Indeed, he went through no less than
FIFTEEN “jobs” in the two years that he was in Israel, before skipping
off to become a loudmouthed, self-styled Wahabi who lives off of Moslem
“charity” in a comfortable Arab neighborhood of Jerusalem. It is no wonder
that Mr. “Cohen” has so much time to devote to his web site. This knowledge
got me to wondering how many other misfits and unemployables spend their
time conjuring up Jewish plots and dreaming of a judenrein utopia on your
web site. I imagine that they are not in the minority. Oh, and regarding
the fate of poor Rachael Corrie, who left America and traveled half way
around the world to Israel in order to help the Arabs with their insurrection:
there’s an old saying, “Charity starts at home.” Had Miss Corrie focused
her misguided do-goodery upon saving the prostitutes of Seattle, or working
the crisis hotline in that suicide-plagued city, she would not have wound
up buried under a couple of tons of concrete in the Gaza mud. (DS)
* Thanks for your commentary, but I don't care whether
Khattab has had 200 different jobs this past weekend -- all that matters
is the moral and factual fibre of his commentary. Per Rachel Corrie: she's
a genuine heroine who sought to expose what you try to veil. Instead of
being worried about Seattle prostitutes, I suggest you might well concern
yourself with all the Jewish pimps in Israel and its massive sex industry.
(Israel is one of the major international sex traffickers, where women
-- mostly, if not all, non-Jewish -- are bought and sold like cattle).
And sorry to correct you further. But the tons of mud and junk that we
ALL are buried beneath is too often the distinctly Jewish version. Which
particular Jewish bulldozer would you have preferred martyr Corrie dropped
beneath, in America?
Hello, Just finished watching the 911 documentary and a few thoughts
immediately crossed my mind. How were these fim-makers funded for nine
months of shooting? Where did the original idea to document a rookie
firefighter come from? How was the fire house closest to the World Traade
Centers com to be the chosen house? Why was another camera given to
the second director just two weeks before 9/11? Why was a false alarm
about a potential gas leak called in at an intersection that had a perfect
view of the WTCs? Why is the executive producer a former CBS 48 Hours
E.P. who is very pro-Israel and Jewish? Why has no one put two and two
togeather and figured out that this documentary was a ploy to put two
cameras in motion at ground zero to document the planned attack on the
WTC further outraging Americans? If you could investigate this youmight
end up finding out who really knew and possibly planned these attacks
- for whatever good it will do now. Happy hunting. (SF)
AMERICANS: Take a good look at our captured U.S. soldiers now suffering
in Iraq. Some have been murdered, the others clearly beaten and tortured
and not likely to survive long enough for a rescue. THIS IS WHAT ISRAEL
DOES EVERY SINGLE DAY with our tax dollars to the Palestinians and anyone
else they deem an enemy (including an American girl they drove over
with a bulldozer). This inhuman cruelty is TYPICAL of Israel, and we
support it. WAKE UP. Americans are dying because Israel won't make peace
and in fact has plans now to expel the Muslim population of Israel and
the occupied territories. IT IS TIME THE U.S. IMPOSE A PEACE UPON ISRAEL.
Stop Israeli spying on and manipulation of the United States.
"I'm a peace-loving, anti-racist environmentalist, with a background
on the left of politics and a strong commitment to freedom of speech,
who until 18 months ago would have thought that the author of your own
site [Jewish Tribal Review] - or the author of my article 'Truth and
Action' - was either a racist or rather loopy. One might say I've newly-awakened
to a nightmare. - and invite readers to demonstrate that the thesis
expounded in 'Truth and Action' is factually incorrect, so I can get
back to normal life. I welcome feedback, critical and otherwise."
(WS -- see his article here.)
Just a note to say thanks for the site. It's a real resource, and I'm
on it quite a bit. It helps to have the "unspeakable" facts spoken, if,
for no other reason, to know we're not totally crazy ... A very valuable
site. Thanks! (CN)
Last week I happened to be online and went to Drudge website and it
said call in to his show. I never have listened to him, nor do I plan
to, but I called in just to ask a question of him. I actually got through
to a screener on the first call and asked the following: "Would Drudge
comment on the Amdocs scandal and the possibility that Israel has already
been spying on Americans for years the way John Poindexter would like
the U.S. gov't to start doing in the name of security?" The screener
(a woman), said "Nobody cares about that," to which I replied, "Well,
Fox News thought enough of it to run four reports on it, which have
since been pulled from their website." "That's old news, she said."
She seemed in no rush to cut me off and go to the next caller which
usually screeners do - you get about 2 seconds to make your pitch before
they line you up to go on the air. "It is not old news," I replied,
continuing, "It is looking like the biggest spy threat to the U.S. is
Israel, and I think Matt Drudge might have an opinion on this." "People
have moved on from that story," she pushed. "Can I ask you a question?"
I asked. "Yes," came the reply. "Are you Jewish?" "Yes I am," she said.
"Well, there you go," I said, to which she started protesting, "Oh that
has NOTHING to do with it ..." to which I replied, "Yes, I think it
has everything to do with why you won't allow that question to get on
the air."
* Apparently you don't realize that MATT DRUDGE
is Jewish too. No joke. 100%. This is the paradigm. And the problem.
People of Jewish heritage are to be found manning the gates throughout
popular culture. There is an intrinsic bias against open public discussion
about anything "Jewish" in a negative context throughout the media web.
I found your web site extremely informative. I would just like to say
a word about the suicide bombings. If suicide bombings are so reprehensible
and evil and F-16 bombings are acceptable, why not provide the Palestinians
with F-16's and gunships carrying laser guided weaponry. I am sure they
will be glad to stop using their bodies and stones which is all they have
now. (SK)
Your website is truly an amazing achievement. Keep up the good work!
(J)
I concur that Jews, at least in America where I have first-hand experience,
use the veneer of victimhood to manipulate people and situations to
their benefit as code of conduct related to political objectives. I
also concur that the state of Israel systematically engages in breathtakingly
outrageous conduct which is clearly criminal and violates the human
rights of others. I also find it abhorrent that it takes instances such
as when that young Palestinian boy was shot as his father tried to shield
him from a cross-fire in which they had no part (only for both of them
to ultimately die and Israel to bulldoze the place to destroy the evidence)
and the need for the video to be smuggled out before Israeli intelligence/IDF
could confiscate it for the world to gain the most threadbare insight
into the objectives and tactics of the Israeli government.
It is not okay to criticize Jews because they have so brilliantly
played the victimhood game. I live in Los Angeles and have friends and
family in the entertainment industry and it is the kiss of career death
to even veer toward criticism of Jews generally on any subject unless
it is in private with close Jewish friends who are secular Jews. The
Jews in Hollywood know that the U.S. government in is their back pocket
and they are wisely keeping silent during the "war on terror."
What I have never understood is why the Muslim/Arab/Palestinian factions
have not employed the same tactics Israel has used to manipulate the
U.S. government and shape American public perception, i.e.; lots of
money from lobbyists, lots of advocacy groups running print/radio/tv
commercials, running their own candidates for office, buying their own
media outlets to run their positions, and generally play the game exactly
as Israel has to garner more American support and to educate Americans
and influence policy. Jews are certainly trying to shut any attempt
at this down, but there seems to be little persistence or commitment
in this approach. Further, it appears for all intents and purposes that
the Muslim/Arab/Palestinian approach is that of general contempt for
America (unless they want to move here). I've always believed that if
the Muslim world sold their point of view as creatively, persistently,
and with as much zeal as the Jews, they could make a real friend of
America. America could be the best friend the Arab world ever had if
only they played the game by the rules that apply here.
As for the persecution coming at you for your views (and those of co-writers?),
I imagine if Israeli intelligence is as good as it is purported to be,
they know who you are, and, frankly, unless you (and your like-minded
co-writers) are Israelis or American Jews of high standing, I think
they aren't afraid of you. I'm sure it gives the officialdom of Israel
absolute fits to have the views you've compiled on your website out
there on the web, but Jews have taken the severest of criticism since
the Bible was first bound into a book. It's nothing new for them. Jews
are pretty thick-skinned in my experience. I look forward to the time
when the origins of the website is posted, and for information about
the writers. It is of course helpful when one balances the content of
information in relation to its source to know the source.
There is so much compelling reading on your site, I'm sure I will return
again and again until I can digest it all over the coming weeks (and
possibly months due to the large volume of information and time constraints).
I certainly have some personal opinions of Jews as a group based upon
my experiences and the nefarious policies of the Israeli government,
but I personally try not to be dismissive of people en masse but judge
them on their individual actions where possible. The materialism I have
witnessed first-hand among some of the Jews I have known over the years
I have always put in the category of "these are an historically merchant
people," and left it at that. As far as Jews being more materialistic
than all others and architects of agendas which have led to much of
the environmental problems our world faces, I'll have to reserve judgment
on that one for now. I'll read the parts of your site which comment
on that as I can.
Your comment: "The issue is not, of course, that every "Jew" is responsible
for the absurdities of consumer culture. Nor that Jews are in any sense
monolithic. The issue is that their very discernible -- and historical
-- collectivist, aggrandizing mindset has been instrumental in the formation
of the ideology that engenders the rape of the Environment." is
very interesting. I'd like to point out that you are an excellent writer
and a clear thinker. I was a little taken aback that some of the comments
you posted on your site from those who wrote to give feedback seemed
clearly to just want to bash Jews and not lend more to the discussion
which is constructive.
I am hoping very much that your site is what it says it is, an instrument
to bring to the light of day a much-needed discussion as to why Jews
have so much wealth and so much power among so few people. I will be
disappointed if the site turns out to have affiliation(s) with known
and discredited anti-Jewish organizations or movements.
Lastly, there was a most interesting article some months back I believe
in The Atlantic which detailed the latest archeological evidence which
does not support official Jewish history. I can't seem to find my copy
for reference at this moment, but I bet you know what I'm talking about.
If you don't search it out, for it detailed how Jews may not be Semites
at all, and may have never come out of Egypt, and in fact may have come
from Western Jordan/east West Bank region based on the evidence from
fire pits (no hooved animal bones were found). There seems to be real
problems with the dates found in the Old Testament and a glaring lack
of physical evidence for any of the claims made about the origins of
the Jews according to this scholar. The author (again, sorry, the name
escapes me) refers to raging scholarly debate about all this, but the
article was most compelling.
* This web site is what it says it is. What you
read is what you get. It lays out the evidence to counter -- in public
discussion -- Jewish/Zionist chauvinism, racism, exploitation, ethnocentric
dominance, wealth and power, ideological fraud, etc. and the subversion
of a true American democracy.
Do you know that your website "Jewish Tribal Review" is blocked on
the computers assigned to young adults in many of the public and public
supported libraries? It is blocked by CYBER PATROL, Reason for blocking
Hate Speech. Take it up from there, guys... It is inexcusable as it
boils down to brain-washing of our children, our future.
-- Thanks for the information. There is nothing
at the Jewish Tribal Review that is unethical, immoral, violent, obscene,
or false. (Any mistakes found are corrected). Such is the totalitarian
thinking surrounding the subject of Jewish/Zionist power and influence.
More about Jewish censorial totalitarianism here.
Peacefire's monitoring of Cyber Patrol censorship here.
[Follow-up]: I know and like your webside, but think it is outragous
that young people are denied access to facts and truth. Anything that
speaks well of Poland, anything about Polish suffering and contributions
to the allied effort, anything that does not present Israelis and Jews
in positive, glowing way is blocked. No criticism of Israel, or our
foreign policy is allowed. Why don't you do what I am doing: go to the
libraries that have computers for school youngsters and check the status
of information you supply and if it is blocked, go to the right source
and PROTEST. Good luck in what you are doing.
I found your website Jewish Tribal Review to be quite fascinating.
I read much of the page on Jewish wealth, and skimmed over parts of
this most extensive site. I have no bias pro or con toward Jews, but
now as my country the USA prepares to go to war with Iraq and "remake
the Middle East" which works to Israel's ends in the short-term, I was
pondering why it is that just a handful out of the world's population
(something like 13 million out of 6 billion) control so much wealth
and have so many positions of power. I'm writing because I didn't see
a biography section about your website's author(s). I'd like to know
something about the person(s) behind the website, which appears upon
first reading as objective and ostensibly fair. Is there a link I missed
which gives (AC)
Thank you for mentioning our PR firm... however, the exact name is : Benador
Associates. Thanks so much for correcting it. Benador Associates, Inc.
http://www.benadorassociates.com
NB: THESE PATHETIC NEUROTIC BASTARDS ARE NOW GOING TO GET GOV'T FUNDING
!!!! DO YOUR READERS..LET ALONE THE 'GOV'T' HAVE ANY IDEA WHAT IS TAUGHT
AT LUBA SCHOOL ?? I DO.
PS: WARM REGARDS I am thoroughly enjoying and learning from the debates
with Shamir and Neuman
http://www.lubavitch.com/article.asp?ID=115
[Per: "Jews and the Left"] Hi, you should probably make
it a point to distiguish between "supporting anti war movements" and being
left wing. I think there is a obvious distinction. The first position
is essentially a liberal one. It need not necessarily translate into support
of the Palestinian cause or criticism of Zionist oppression. I think it
would be more appropriate to label many of the "leaders", let alone supporters
of the anti war moverment, as liberals (in varying degrees), but not necessarily
leftists. If you consider that many of the anti war protesters are supporters
of capitalism (in one degree or another), then it would not be appropriate
to label them leftists. (To simplify the matter) To do so would be to
conflate two essentially opposed tendencies: supporters of capitalism
and opponents of capitalism. I think it's fair to say that many within
the anti war movement are not really opposed to capitalism, as opposed
to particular policies of governments which further the interests of capalists
(including Jewish capitalists). It would be more appropriate to characterize
the left as people who support the following tendencies: anarchism and
marxism. "Progressives", as they like to be labeled, aren't in my opinion
and ( I would imagine) the opinion of the overwhelming majority of abherents
of anti-capitalist tendencies, left wing. I think that you will find groups
such as the international socialists, ANSWER, or the IAC, doing their
best to build a broad enough coalition to oppose the possible invasion
of Iraq. They might purposely try not to antangonize mainstream "senstivities",
which would include straying away from discussing the issue of Palestine
at demonstrations. This might be a wise thing to do in the short term.
This is different to saying that they are doing the bidding of the zionists,
or that their position can be explained by the fact that there are individuals
within their organizations who are unapologetic supporters of Israel.
I think ANSWER is connected to the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), which
would make them right wing Marxists. The ISs are also a right wing Troskyist
faction open to the notion of building mass party. Even while having their
many critics amongst the left, these organizations are of a completely
different brand of tea than organizations such as Amnesty International
USA ... I'm basing my opinions largely on what I've experienced at anti-war
demonstrations up here and through my involvement with left wings organizations.
(BB)
Excerpts from "History of the Persian Empire" by A. T. Olmstead, uncontested
authority of the history of the Persian Empire at the Oriental Institute
of the Chicago University (first published: The University of Chicago
Press, 1948) 1) Usury in ancient Babylonia (page 83-85) “Private banking
as a commercial proposition first made its appearance in Babylonia...
The more closely we examine these documents, the more impressed we are
with the wide use of credit during the period... We begin to suspect that
the abnormal rise in prices may be due in part to what we call credit
inflation. When we realize that the final payment on a farm is made by
the grandson of the original purchaser, we realize that installment buying
might have brought about the same difficulties as in our last period of
depression... From the standpoint of the businessman, Babylonia possessed
a remarkably modern system of doing business.” 2) Extremely prudent speculations
by the author based on recovered banking records (page 192) “... it was
suggested Babylon's most prominent banking family, that of the Egibi,
was Jewish in origin and that the founder's name was Jacob in his
own language... There is another influential family whose ancestor was
Bel-iau; the name is a challenge to paganism and may be paraphrased:
"Our God Yahweh is the true Lord (and not your alleged Marduk)." 3) On
the collapse of the Babylonian economy, the first "modern" economic crisis
(page 299) “It was the custom to melt down the gold and silver and to
pour it into jars... our Babylonian documents clearly witness a lessened
use of the precious metals. For a time, credit made possible the continuation
of business, but the insensate demand for actual silver in the payment
of taxes drove the landlords in increasing numbers to loan sharks, who
gave money in exchange for the pledge--the actual use of the field or
the slave whose services were thus lost until the improbable redemption.
As coined money became a rarity, hoarded by the loan sharks, credit increased
the inflation, and rapidly rising prices made the situation still more
intolerable... Naturally, our first interest is in the large Jewish colony...
We may observe holders of bow land borrowing money for taxes and "gift"
at 40 per cent per annum (double the 20 per cent standard since the days
of Hammurabi) from loan sharks…” 4) Mercenaries: this passage unrelated
to the others but of some interest nevertheless because consistent with
other events of the same nature described in your book (page 466) “Many
Jews had found refuge in Egypt; during the Achemenid period, they willingly
served as Persian mercenaries and thereby did not win the love of natives.
When the Egyptians were long in successful revolt against their Persian
paymasters, the fate of these mercenaries could not have been happy.”
5) Indirect admission as to the origin of the “bankers” (page 466) “In
Palestine, the bankers did not hesitate to plunder their fellow-Jews under
the very shadow of the Holy City.”
In http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/27govt2.htm, it is mentioned that
Rupert Murdoch is not a jew:...Fox is owned by non-Jewish, but ardently
pro-Israel, Rupert Murdoch ... Now the truth is that Murdoch is in fact
a jew, by birth and by up-bringing. Please refer to http://www.fpp.co.uk/online/02/05/Murdoch2.html
: "I shall quote exactly what Candour [a rightwing British journal edited
by A K Chesterton] said in its June 1984 issue (vol. XXXV, no. 6): BIOGRAPHICAL
details of [Rupert] Murdoch's past are sketchy and often contradictory.
One reads that his grandfather was an impoverished Presbyterian minister
who migrated to Australia from England, that his father was a low-paid
reporter for a British newspaper in Australia, and yet, young Rupert divided
his time between his family's suburban home near Melbourne and the family's
sheep ranch in the country. He was educated first at the fashionable Geelong
private school, and went on to the elitist and aristocratic Oxford University
in England. "Rupert's father Sir Keith Murdoch [see below] attained his
prominent position in Australian society through a fortuitous marriage
to the daughter of a wealthy Jewish family, née Elisabeth Joy Greene.
Through his wife's connections, Keith Murdoch was subsequently promoted
from reporter to chairman of the British-owned newspaper where he worked.
There was enough money to buy himself a knighthood of the British realm,
two newspapers in Adelaide, South Australia, and a radio station in a
faraway mining town. For some reason, Murdoch has always tried to hide
the fact that his pious mother brought him up as a Jew... And that, as
I am sure you know, makes him a Jew according to the law of the Talmud,
and indeed according to the present laws of Israel." It is further hinted
that Murdoch is in fact the face of a powerful and rich jewish group.
I think that all of this is rather obvious. The control of the media is
instrumental in over-populating the political or social echelon with jews.
Why this rather simple observation eludes the general public? Well, for
one reson the jewish propaganda machine works as a sophistication of a
purely totalitarian propaganda: on one side there is the homogeneity of
the news - no matter what media you turn to, news are worded almost identicaly;
on the other side however is the representation of this very press as
a bearer of higher moral standards. This is achieved by simply defending
minor causes, unrelated on first glance to the jewry. So, after denouncing
let say racism against african-americans, this same press has the moral
standing to call names every dared to critisize Israel individual. What
is mostly beyond grasp is the idea that the tribal affiliations over-rule
the typical human value system. I personally was stunned when I read in
the torah how crimes are being weighed in the jewish context - stealing
from a gentile is praised, a jew stealing from another jew - rebuked,
however if a gentile steals from a jew - has to be killed. It is not only
the dual standard that is startling, mostly it is the disproportion in
dealing with the same manner - on one side you praise and on the other
you advise for death... Another thing is that even if the general public
seeps through the heaps of misinformation and miswording, it is hard to
impossible to voice any opinion. The consequences are brutal, long-termed
and go further than the individual in question - after his/her family,
possessions, job, etc. I guess people are simply scared...
Dear JTR webmaster and all staff! Great info's, excellent site! Without
courageous guys like you, this country would be lost... We'll support
you wherever we can. Keep up the good job and, whatever happens,
never give up! What else can we say... thanks and thanks again!
Is CNN coverage too one sided? I just tuned on to CNN starting at 12noon,
and the only astronaut being discussed is the Israeli one. The other six
were mere footnotes. The first 30 minutes focused on only the one from
Israel. Reassuring the American people that the President Bush is in contact
with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. One Israeli official after another is
being interviewed. Not one, American government official or American expert
is on the CNN airwaves. Not one mention of the names of the Americans
killed. CNN has a satellite hook-up with another Israeli official and
the anchor person starts off with condolences for the Israeli people.
This is mind boggling! Is CNN coverage imply Israeli astronaut brings
bad luck to space program. Also, does it surprise you to hear that the
Israeli one was the son of a holocaust survivor? About a 5 minute interview
with the Israeli astronaut is profiled. Later, the Holocaust question
pops-up.....with the anchor woman thinking both of his parents were former
concentration camp inmates. Only to be corrected by an Israeli official,
she was interviewing, to be told that the mother was a Holocaust survivor.
It is now 1:08 and since 12noon, it is the first time they mention all
the names of the dead Americans......and sill no in-depth coverage of
the dead Americans. I wonder if this has anything to do with the hundreds
of commercials being aired every week on CNN assuring CNN viewers that
Israel is our "Real' ally. (MS)
You hit a home run with this piece [Welcome to Amerisraelistan]
and am very glad to have discovered your website thanks to WRH. Since
you are so knowledgeable about our Jewish Problem and its justification
(The Holocaust), I am puzzled by your acceptance of the Jewish line
regarding Hitler as a murderer, as someone to be compared with the Jewish
gangsters and assassins. Once you see David Cole's video of his visit
to Auschwitz and interview with its director, Dr. Pieper, who admits
the "gas chamber" was faked by the Soviets in the early 50s, then you
get the picture that the whole thing was a Nuremberg lie along with
the soap and lampshades, constructed as we were justifying the ex post
facto murders of Germany's leaders, along with millions of German civilians
(after the war). So, if you subtract the Six Million from Hitler, what
do you get? You get a man who led his country in a struggle against
Jewish aggression (Versailles Dictate, Untermayer's boycott, Morgenthau's
Plan and Eisenhower's extermination of millions). You apparently understand
Jewish aggression as well as anyone in this country but are still stuck
on how we should respond to it. We cannot write or talk our way around
it; it must be resisted with force because what the Jews did to Germany
they plan to do to us. What happened to Germany during and after the
war proved that Hitler was correct in his plan to destroy Communism
and deport Jews out of Europe, which was his Final Solution. Churchill's
Deception by Louis Kilzer reveals that Hitler offered to resign if England
would join with Germany to destroy Jewish Communism in the Soviet Union.
I think you realize that a war to the death with Jewry and Judaism is
inevitable for us now. Please look at James Bacque's Other Losses and
Crimes & Mercies. (JB)
I have been sharing most of the opinions published on your web-site
for some time now. In fact I started some research on my own after I
got through the gentile-meat-processor at my university.
For no other reason than pure malice and fanatism (of course if power
and greed are not listed as reasons), some of these people would destroy,
fabricate, insinuate, steal (intelectual property, real estate, money).
Your web-site articulated very neatly and to the point some of the major
concerns in regard to the jewish ethnocentrism (excellent term by the
way). I am also chilled by the extent and the brutality of their "reign".
Not surprised really, as I saw it first hand how far they can go...
However, I always thought of jewish fanatism spreading its wings mostly
after the WWII, a view shattered to pieces by some of the materials
I read on your site and the consequent further reading I did.
There is a very interesting theory - the revisionism, (I didn't find
anything related to it on your web-site, apologies if you know about
it) behind a book called "Did 6 millions really die?". The witch-hunt
after the distributor (mind you the author was identified as somebody
else) of this lengthy paper in Canada is quite typical about the agressiveness
with which jews pursue any opinion that questions anything jewish. It
is an obvious fact that most of the face of now-a-days jewry is build
up un the basis of a ultimate victimization: the poor, honest, all-the-time
victim of universal unjustice. The "anti-semite" slap is the most famous
example of that very policy. The truth more often is that the jewry
is filthy rich, overly greedy, moral is secondary to the tribe-obligations
and the agressor rather than the victim. When confronted with any if
these, they take great pride.
I have always pondered what is the origin of this socio-psychopatic
behaviour: is it the family or some fanatic religious teaching, masqueraded
as jewish identity. Another major loop-hole to claim victimization is
the question whether jewry is a race or a religion. The jews have always
prefered to occupy the vast gap between the two, leaning towards one
or the other whenever the situation calls for it. Anyway... Just wanted
to congratulate you on the good work and the braveness... Although who
knows, might be the case that the whole site is yet another counter-intelligence
stunt of the jewish propaganda machine.
I had one question however - I found very little information beyond
Stalin's years and the immediate post-war communism on the developments
of Eastern Europe. I found some feedback from readers on your web-site
about the jews in the current Bulgarian government. Are there any sources
for that information? What about other former-Eastern European countries?
The topic is very interesting to me, as the whole communism thingy was
one of the social projects manifactured almost entirely by Jews. The
very idea of communism is that every member of the society contributes
to the well-being of the whole society and benefits only as far as his/her
needs stretch. Now this view is in stark contradiction to the typical
thriftiness and greed for more commodities demonstrated again and again
from jewish characters... Well, this turned to be rather long. Keep
the good work. It kind of gives me a faint hope that not all Americans
are owned by the matrix. Best in life. (L)
Here's a story you might be interested in. Recently, the ABC-TV show "20-20"
did a segment that highlighted the crusade of a casting director named
Billy Damota. A number of washed-up casting directors (all JEWS), had
been charging young, stone-broke aspiring actors and actresses hundreds
of dollars to read for them, and Billy, being the kind of honorable guy
he is, fought to end this outrage tooth and nail. He finally got the State
of California to issue some sort of injunction against these weasels,
and for his troubles, he was threatened, harrassed, you name it. Casting
Directors are in business to find talented newcomers, not to rip them
off, as soon as they blow into town. The lowlife casting directors (from
shows like "Three's Company", or "Charles In Charge", i.e. dreck from
the past) were taking gross advantage of naive, hungry kids. The segment
appeared about a month ago. Again, I'm not kidding, every one of the offenders
were Jews, and were they ever mad their "practice" got curtailed. I'm
sure you could easily obtain a transcript of the segment. (AC)
Hello, could you please check whether Golda Meir was really born in Milwaukee
? According to my sources she was born 1898 in Kiew (Russia) and emigrated
with her parents to the USA in 1906 and married 1917 Meyerson. eg: http://www.wic.org/bio/gmeir.htm
Given that Meir features prominently at the top of your web page you might
put the data right.
Your work is invaluable. (AA)
Please add to your mentioned sources the ww.INFYMEDIA.ORG.IL, or the INDYMEDIA
ISRAEL It is different from the Palestinian "Jerusalem Indymedia" and
consists of the efforts of progressive groups of Jews to think the things
over and over. We, a large group of Dutch, Belgian and French Jews, shall
be pleased if you'll include the reference to it on your site as INDEPENDENT
MEDIA ISRAEL.
A good friend recommended your site to me, and my reply to you is,
"keep up the good work!" I especially enjoyed the chapters on Jews and
slavery, and Jewish involvement in organized crime. I copied those to
word files and placed them in my shared documents folder for the frequent
downloader crowd to enjoy. Your domain name is in the header so that
they can visit your site. I hope this helps a little bit. All you need
to do now is get a plug on the culture-polluting Howard Stern show!
(SC)
It's not true that jews are more intelligent, the fact is that when
a jew shows a bit of intelligence, there are thousands of jews who supports
him (money and propaganda) so he could achieve success and fame. Jewish
achievements are emphasised by jewish media, while there are lots of
people out there much more intelligent and capable. That's why its easier
for a jew to grow and develop in society. It's incredible, but here
in Argentina, we experience almost the same as you experience in North
America. Newspapers are jewish, judges are jewish and my university
is in jewish hands!!! We are also programmed to self censor a jewish
attack, and you feel afraid of complaining about them. They are something
like First Class Citizens, you could not touch them, because that's
racism, but they can do whatever they like with you. (and while writing
this, I am thinking twice if I have to post it or not, israeli intelligence
can be out there). Last year on of the tv channels (channel 9) was bought
by a non jewish man. All jewish media was furious treating his a nazi,
a racist, an anti-semite. They are inventing stories to make people
hate him. It is quite easy to see how jewish media and journalist manipulate
people. Another example of jewish bulling system, was the case of a
famous christian priest. He was blamed of carrying sexual abuses, they
wanted him in prison, 24 hs around the clock there were jew journalist,
cartoons and newspaper comics mocking him, saying that people who attended
to his church went to have orgies. With a hate I have never seen before.
But the truth was shortly revealed a left jewish association wanted
to manage the charity association the priest built during his lifetime.
A few years ago a jewish bank went to bankruptcy, jewish members had
been warned so they could take out their money, but those who didn't
integrate the jewish community lost their money. And cases like this
there are thousands. The psicological pressure they make in peoples
minds is enormous. I have seen how in a short time people shifted their
thought short after media insisted in a point of view. The power media
has in peoples minds is gigantic. That's why more than half of media
owners and jewrnalists are jewish. "Gimme the media control, and I will
decide which direction society will follow" Have you ever heard of media
brainwashing? When people see that something written in the news is
a fake, they first reject it. The second time they say that that is
not true. The third time they start doubting of them selves. The fourth
time they say that it could be. Then they start accepting it, until
it comes a time when as so many people says it could be true. And finally
they accept the fake, and then they start defending it. And it works
quite well when all media has an homogeneous point of view. Jewish and
Lefty organisations know this, that's why they are so powerful and influential
in media and culture. Because they are the keys of brainwashing.
Just look up for words (in google or whatever you like) --------- "Padre
Grassi" (Father Grassi) and his foundation "Felices los niños" http://www.terra.com.ar/canales/informaciongeneral/57/57493.html
(this link is only a mediatic introduction) http://www.po.org.ar/po/po779/elcura.htm
(this one is a political party (partido obrero - workers party) managed
by a jew called rieznik) ------- "Daniel Haddad" new owner of channel
9, mix this name with "nazi" or "facista" and look how many results
you achieve. I have just seen that there is another haddad, focus in
the argentine one. -------- "Banco Patricios" Bank and "Beraja" http://www.libreopinion.com/libertad/1998/08/9808nv1s03.htm
-------- But look further in other sites, because there is plenty info
out there. (T)
[This feedback was elicited by a JTR post at a discussion forum]
Your site expoes the growing evil of what FDR's War Secretary Cordell
Hull denounced as 'Semitism gone wild.' I find it to be a valuable site,
and think it could potentially raise the consciousness of many Americans.
Apropos of your e-mail exchange with Professor Michael Neumann, I tend
to think that you're both right. He is interested in exposing Jewish perfidy,
but to do it in a fashion that he thinks will appeal to the widest possible
audience, at this time. JTR is far more audacious in its undertaking,
and as such, has encountered some difficulty it appears, in getting its'
core message across. It may get easier as time progresses. One hopes so,
as your message is a bracing and re-vitalizing morally intelligent one.
I think it's possible for an iconoclastic (Jewish) Professor like Michael
Neumann to do his work, and for JTR to do its, and slowly, but surely,
all good and decent people will be able to wrest America away from the
greedy wacko Jews who have sullied it so. I do think it's demonstrably
true that whever Jews gain the upper hand in a given society, the best
and fairest features of that society will vanish, more and more each day.
Soulless materialism has a way of undermining everything meaningful and
good. And, thus, it's incumbent upon all of us, to do more than we think
we ought to help put a stop to it. The sooner the better. (RV)
[Commentary concerning Michael Neumann's Counterpunch
article about "Anti-Semitism." See also here.]
I don't see this as a critique as much as an update on "chutzpah". Neumann
is telling Jews to stop acting like (pretending to be) frightened victims.
He's telling them that they have power, wealth, political support and
a nuclear army at their disposal -- they're perfectly secure -- crying
persecution has outlived its usefulness. He's saying it's time for Jews
to throw away the antisemitism crutch, stand up straight and stride the
globe like Whites, instead of pretending to quiver. He says (with satisfaction,
I thought) that others are being persecuted more than Jews--time for Jews
to give them a turn at being low man on the totem pole. [I expect Jews
would love to look down on "poor, persecuted whites", which is why I reject
White groups that use that tactic].
Neumann is a stereotypical Jewish writer. After beginning with a reference
to "some left-wing Jewish writer" daring to criticize Israel, by two sentences
later, the left-wing Jewish writer has become risque gentile hangers-on
daring to criticize Israel.
He uses word games supposedly to show what antisemitism *isn't* (these
are what he means when he says "have some fun with it), but nowhere in
the article does Neumann finally define what antisemitism *is*. He says
correctly that "antisemitism" doesn't mean hatred of semites, but hatred
of Jews but immediately obscures that simple truth by religion/race/cultural-entity/Zionism/Judaism/shellgame
obfuscation. The trick is to not follow the magician's hands, but keep
your eye on the ball: hatred of Jews is what antisemitism is all about--period.
Neumann says that he and plenty of other Jews inside and outside Israel,
most Europeans, the Arab world and growing numbers of North Americans
are pro-Palestinian; all these people know that Israel has been committing
war crimes; but it doesn't matter. Jews can handle it; none of it can
hurt Jews.
1. Settlements are morally wrong, thus, if opposing settlements is antisemitic,
then antisemitism is the morally correct response to settlement.
2. Settlements equal Zionism, hence Zionism is morally wrong, and if opposing
Zionism is antisemitic, then antisemitism is the morally correct response
to Zionism.
3. War crimes are morally wrong; Israel/Zionism have committed massive,
intentional, brutal war crimes for purely racist goals, and all Jews,
in general, supported Israel and Zionism. Jews were in no danger from
speaking out against it, but they didn't. If speaking out against not
only the leaders but Jews, in general, is anti-semitic, then antisemitism
is the reasonable (morally correct?) response to Israel's/Zionism's war
crimes.
If "antisemitism" is to be effective as a term of condemnation, says Neumann,
it can't be used to condemn morally correct responses to Jewish/Israeli
activities, as in the above examples. The problem is, "narrowly defining"
antisemitism apparently isn't that simple, because now we start running
into "clearly" and "probably" for things that aren't all that clear or
probable. For example, I don't think that hating Jews because they were
out to dominate the Aryans was "clearly" antisemitic. (should he be using
the word "antisemitic" in formulating a definition for "antisemitic"?)
And no sooner does Neumann express confidence that "we probably share
enough morality" to create a definition for antisemitism that "captures
all and only bad acts or attitudes towards Jews", than he states, "we
share enough morality to say that all racially based acts and hatreds
are bad, so we can safely count them as antisemitic", and I see we probably
*don't* share enough morality to do the job. If "antisemitism" is to be
an effective term of condemnation, he says, it must apply to things beyond
mere racism (the starting point--zero), but not beyond "clearly unjustified
and serious hostility to Jews". "Clearly" again -- "clearly unjustified"
and "serious hostility" are subjective terms, not shared moral absolutes.
Neumann positions alongside racism at point zero "antisemites who trust
in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion" and "racists who complain of Jewish
dominance of the economy." He cites them as examples of "antisemitism
in a narrow, negative sense of the word"--actions, propaganda and motives
designed to hurt and do real damage to Jews, just because they are Jews
(earlier he said even the Nazis didn't hate Jews just because they were
Jews). And he continues formulating a definition of "antisemitism" by
using the term and its derivatives as if they had already been defined.
But wait.....
At this point in our quest "to narrow the definition of antisemiticism"
so that "antisemitic" cannot be used to describe reasonable and morally
correct acts, we're told that all of the above was just "playing games"
and it's time to get serious and ask about "the role of *genuine*, bad
antisemitism in the Israel-Palestine conflict and in the world at large."
I thought that we of the shared morality were already doing that! Now
I have to add "genuine" and "bad" to "clearly" and "probably" as potential
trouble spots.
With respect to the Arab world, Neumann says that everyday antisemitism
is really just the reasonable response to Jewish encroachment and atrocities
and will stop as soon as the encroachment and atrocities stop, but "genuine
antisemitism" involves the distribution of the Protocols of the Elders
and myths about stealing the blood of gentile babies, and these he calls
"utterly inexcusable". I'm guessing these things would also be utterly
inexcusable in the non-Arab world). We should not be bullied into believing
Arab antisemitism is inexcusable, but conclude this out of our own sense
of morality. What we need to do, he says, is to ask how much harm this
antisemitism is doing now or might do in future, and where, and why.
Present harm is apparently not worth mentioning, but Neumann believes
that future harm from antisemitism (definition?) is far more likely to
come from Western Europe, than from the Arab world. He says there's no
doubt LePen is antisemitic but shows no sign of acting on it (if he isn't
acting on it, hence does no harm to Jews--but he's still antisemitic,
does that mean he distributes the Protocols or ritual murder myths?).
[Aside: Neumann states that Hitler and the Russian antisemitic rioters
were open about their intentions and didn't court Jewish support. This
doesn't quite jibe with I've read on the subject]. This is the extent
of Neumann's exploration into potential future harm to Jews from "antisemitism"
in Western Europe.
Neumann presses the case throughout his article that it is Muslims and
gypsies who are the most hated and persecuted people in the world. He
presses the other side of the coin as well: "The position of Jews is much
closer to the position of whites, who are also, of course, the victims
of racist attacks." Jews and whites are two separate groups. But they're
close. Whereas Jews are not close to Muslims and gypsies (who are also,
of course, the victims of racist attacks). Unlike those groups, Jews are
not in danger, protected as they are by "a nuclear-armed Jewish state"
and the US and Canada; Jews don't even need the imagery of "The Holocaust"
anymore--they're simply not in danger.
Neumann suggests that, since antisemites (still undefined) hate immigrants
and Arabs much more than they hate Jews, Jews should fight these antisemites
on grounds of their anti-immigration and anti-Arab positions, not their
antisemitism. Neither the criminal actions of Jews in the past or present,
nor the hatred these actions have provoked are of any importance whatsoever--the
hatred is impotent. All that is important is whether harm can come to
Jews in the future as a result, and this, he believes, is extremely unlikely
for reasons already mentioned.
The moral of this story, as I think I said in the beginning, is that Jews
should cast aside their cloak of victimhood as unsuitable raiment for
a wealthy, powerful, protected, untouchable group.
I have to add this: I disapprove of using the words "brilliant" and "intellect[ual]"
to describe articles like this. By way of *continuous* repetition, Jews
have for years been conditioning people to associate those words with
"Jew". Brilliant? think Jew. Intellectual? think Jew. I refuse to adopt
their self-serving language.
(MOB)
I have been looking for a list of all Jews serving in government, including
Senators and Congressmen. Can you help? By the way, very informative site.
Should be mandatory reading. (MJ)
Jews in Congress here:
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/government.htm
Broader picture of Jews and the U.S. government here:
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/27govt1.htm
After studying these articles represented by the Jewish Tribal Review
I became enlightened also because I am studying Judaism (Torah, Talmud,
Halacha, Kadish, Kaballah, and many others). The main teaching of the
Torah is quite plain and simple for all of our fellow jews to see and
as well for those who are studying Judaism, that central teaching is
this: That the Torah discloses that Israel's deliverance from Egypt
was meant to demonstrate His omnipotence and compassion to all of humanity.
In his commentary on Torah, the great nineteenth century leader of German
Jewry, Rabbi Sampson Raphael Hirsch, explained: "It was not only to
educate this people to be Thy people; the enlightenment and instruction
of the other nations was also an essential objective of this whole miraculous
redemption. Which means we are to be the "Light of the world". To be
a guide leading the way for everyone toward God. To help, to assist,
to show compassion. Mosaic law was intended for the Jewish people but
with profound implications for the rest of humanity. Indeed, our tradition
tells us that the first mitzvot (commandments) were given in seventy
languages, so that all the nations of the earth could understand them.
Yes, our destiny is to be the "light of the world", to help, to guide
the way for others toward God, to assist, to show proper compassion,
to give well placed compassion. The message of the prophets, including
Jonah's admonition to Nineveh, was often directed at the gentile nations.
Yes, we Jews are to be the light of the world, showing others the way
to God. To help them, to assist them, to guide them. Love your neighbors
as yourself - one of the fundamental principles of the Torah. "When
a stranger sojourns with you in your land," God commands the Israelites,
"you shall do him no wrong...and you shall love him as yourself." These
commandments are meant to be followed both in Israel and in the Gentile
nations for Jews are also living everywhere in the world and in many
different countries, different nations. Wherever we go we will always
be considered as the "Light of the world". To follow the ways of the
Torah as opposed to what some of our fellow Jews are doing which is
against the laws of theTorah. Honesty, humility, compassion, sharing
of wisdom, not taking adavantage of others, and helping of others which
means both Jews and non-Jews, are the marks of Judaism as oppose to
what some other Jews are doing today which are against the Laws of the
Torah. I thank you for your complete honesty and courage in facing the
truth for this is the way on how we can save Judaism, our people, and
the world. To show the world what true Judaism really is and is not.
Shalom! (S)
Hi. Great site. Just been looking at "When Victims Rule". This is terrific.
Is it in hard print? If not, this must be a priority! (S)
Dear Sirs, First I would like to thank you for your efforts for exposing
the evils of Judaism ... I thank you for all the valuble information you
offer on your site ... Please keep up your fine work, and dont hesistate
to contact us if we can assist you in any honest way to help let the world
know todays Judaism is PURE evil.
Thought you might be interested in this.
The Gay Hepatitis-B Vaccine Experiment.
Conveniently lost in the history of AIDS is the gay Hepatitis-B vaccine
experiment that immediately preceded the decimation of gay Americans.
A "cohort" of over a thousand young gays was injected with the vaccine
at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan during the period November 1978
to October 1979. [1] Similar gay experiments were conducted in San Francisco,
Los Angeles, Denver, St. Louis, and Chicago, beginning in 1980. [2] The
AIDS epidemic broke out shortly thereafter. The experiment was run by
Wolf Szmuness, a Polish Jew born in 1919. He was a young medical student
in eastern Poland when the Nazis invaded the country in 1939. His entire
family perished in the Holocaust. When Poland was partitioned, Szmuness
was taken prisoner and sent to Siberia.
THE REST IS HERE
http://uts.cc.utexas.edu/~wbova/fn/earth/AIDS.htm
but wait there's more .
The Centers for Disease Control admitted in 1981 that 4% of those who
had received the vaccine were AIDS infected, and in 1984 they admitted
it was 60%. Now they refuse to give out figures at all. (12 , 13) http://www.van.org.uk/hepatitis/hep_b_factsheet.htm
http://aidsbiowar.com http://www.sonic.net/~doretk/ArchiveARCHIVE/Aids/Aids.html
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/who.htm
be sure to check out the links at the botto of the page below.
http://www.boydgraves.com
I just stumbled onto your site and read the exchanges with Mr. Franklin
[Raymond Franklin], the "hate" expert. Bravo! He'll never print the exchanges
on his site of course. By the way, does Franklin list the ADL as a "hate"
organization? I recall Bill Buckley saying many years ago something like
this: "The specialty of the ADL is...defamation!" I can't give you a cite
and I'm sure Buckley would never say it today, God help him! (AD)
[Per recent Israeli international real estate acquistions] As they
victimize themselves and award shekels to the shabbas goy element, the
orchards of our learning culture are destroyed, our children's morals
are corrupted and they are able to declare states of crisis/war painted
on a darker-than-life canvas screen. All the while, it's true that the
Israelis are increasing their purchases of real estate and apartments
beyond the pale of their self-made Israeli hell... But, you know, some
Slavic papers claim it's not merely for economic investment; there's the
insecurity peripheral factor that contains the Israeli soul/psyche itself.
Approximately one or two years ago, Polish language papers filled pages
with info similar to that below; mainly, Zionists and Israeli citizens
were purchasing buildings, apartments and other structures within the
Polish state. Before that, a few brave journalists composed columns indicating
that Eastern European Zyds [Jews] -who were unable to adequately function
in the Polish language- were migrating to Poland. Unfortunately, many
of these were obtaining prestigious jobs within the government apparatchik
and as professors at universities... To this author the above was more
than interesting for two (2) reasons: (A) Decades ago, a notorious anti-American
and anti-majority communist, was unable to appropriately function in the
English language --I think his name was Swiato-- so, he lost his job within
Warsaw's Secret Police (UB) and (thus) secured a prominent position from
his brethren within the CIA; and this brings us to a second relevant thought
(B). You see, the trend has never abided. For example, during the early
1990s a similar incident occurred. An anti-American assistant editor for
Lithuania's second largest newspaper --I think it was in Kaunas-- left
her fellow anti-Lithuanian commies in Lithuania. Today she's residing
in New England amongst her American Zydzi... By the way, all of this was
quite openly published in the Polonian papers. But, how many of you ever
heard of Mr. Swiato? Wouldn't it be wonderful if there was a national
TV channel or major large newspaper that could track the activities of
the nemesis of mankind and how they network all over our globe? As it
is (now), mankind can only obtain info from those willing to face the
chosen's legal guillotine or cannibal indoctrinated multitudes... Fighting
for freedom of speech and/or to share/translate data from various nations/continents
is more than difficult. The disparity between their 'us against them'
evil and our good majority values, almost seems insurmountable. It's heartbreaking.
Tomorrow they might either change your neighborhood, or -if the Israeli
dream fails- move in next door. Nuff. (CB)
Thank you. Hello, I greatly appreciate your website, and am reading
"When Victims Rule". It has given me a very intimate understanding of
what Jews think and why. It's a problem of religion and ideology, not
of race. At the end of Chapter 17, you mention a few Jews who've asked
to have their name removed from Jewish reference works. I can add another:
World Chess Champion Bobby Fischer wrote Encyclopedia Judaica to have
his name removed. His letter to them and their reply can be found at
a link on his homepage:
http://home.att.ne.jp/moon/fischer/ Bobby's
mother was Jewish, but Bobby claims that he is uncircumcised and not
a Jew. He is, in fact, opposed to Judaism and Jews. In an interview,
he stated his belief that the only way forward for the Jews was to begin
by renouncing circumcision as mutilation and child abuse. You might
want to listen to his Sept. 11th, 2001 interview if you haven't already
... You might like to read some essays from my website. I'm a general
philosopher and a deprogrammed protestant Christian Jew. I've only recently
begun to grasp the influence of Judaism and Jews in the world. As a
philosopher, I trace problems to their foundational ideas--in this case
the problem is the Torah ... I am beginning to develop an essay on the
influence of the Torah on the course of Western history--the true history
behind the facade ... "
[FLOATING ON DISCUSSION GROUPS]:
I sent this to about 20 Newspapers. Feel free to copy/paste and give
it to your local fishwrap:
Dear Editor; United has 81,000 employees and is the second largest airline
in the USA. Recently, it asked for a $1.8 billion loan guarantee from
Washington to avoid bankruptcy. The 9/11 tragedy, among other problems,
had sent the company's fortunes spiraling. Unlike Israel, however, which
has never gotten turned down for any loan guarantees from Uncle Sam,
the Bush-Cheney gang said "no" to United, on Dec. 4. Now, a once proud
giant of the industry, is headed for Chapter 11. Washington is willing
to permit it to swim with the sharks. Its 81,000 employees are left
to wonder if they will even have a job in 2003. To add insult to injury,
two of Israel's leading sycophants, jumped on United. "This bankruptcy
is just what the industry needs," wrote the insufferable Tory, George
F. Will (N.Y. Post, 12/08/02). He blamed the company's situation on
"labor costs." William Buckley Jr., the neolithic conservative, chirped
in on the same issue: "United has to cope with the market forces. It
needs to be stressed, especially in moments of high confusion, what
the rules are for a dynamic economy. Overhead cost have to be met by
income" (Washington Times, 12/12/02). Meanwhile, Sharon's Tel Aviv regime
doesn't have any of those economic concerns. It doesn't have to worry
about "overhead cost," "income," or "labor costs." All it has to do,
is make a request for a loan guarantee to Washington and fill in the
dollar amount, in this case, another $10 Billion. Under the 1983 Cranston
Amendment, when U.S. aid is extended as grants or loans to Israel, it
never returns to the Treasury. U.S. loans to Israeli are forgiven. I
for one think this is disgraceful, and i feel we should petition our
elected leaders and representatives to reverse this policy. For publication,
Ed Toner, Captain American Airlines, Retired 732-840-4203 captained@comcast.net
Thank You for this informative site. Not sure why you woul be labelled
under Hate either. I am not anti-semetic myself but I have called into
question "who controls my news and media" .The following link is from
my local paper...yopu may find it interesting ...The Leader Post is
owned by Izzy Asper who owns CanWest and a good percentage of our Canadian
media...including both major papers in my province...the owner before
that was Conrad Black, who I am sure you have heard of as well...Thanks
for the intelligence and not the hate...I'm hoping others can piece
this together as well.
Thank you for your comments. We live in a culture
that condemns a very necessary critical inquiry into Jewish power and
hegemony as "hate." If there were more open-minded people like you around,
things would be getting better for everyone -- including Jews. Thanks
for the link. I'm aware of Asper, and -- as huge as his influence is
-- he's just a small part of the problem.
Hello Gog. Your cartoons are worthy of Der Sturmer,
Streicher would be proud, but then again, he probably was your model.
I especially note that all your Jewish caricatures have huge noses, "those
hooked nosed Jew bastards" right fellows? As far as the Talmud, before
you continue your outcry about Judaism vs. Modernism, first demonstrate
to me that modern values are the standard by which all things are to be
judged, unless you can do that, then your denunciations are based merely
upon unproven a priori assumptions of liberalism (pan-humanism). Then
again you probably won't bother to respond to a " Jewish parasite" like
me. so if your a man, then respond to me. Am Yisrael Chai! Rabbi Alex
J. Coleman
Dear rabbi. Thanks for your commentary. Here's a
response to it:
RABBI: Your cartoons are worthy of Der Sturmer,
Streicher would be proud, but then again, he probably was your model.
RESPONSE: Sorry to disappoint you, but no. The cartoons
are original. They have nothing to do with your focus of interest and
(apparently) self-identity.
RABBI: I especially note that all your Jewish
caricatures have huge noses, "those hooked nosed Jew bastards" right fellows?
RESPONSE: You are looking, but not seeing. Not all
our Jewish characters have "huge noses." Look again. You are making broad
claims based upon YOUR STEREOTYPES. But even if they did "all" have "big
noses," so what? They're cartoons. "Big noses" are pretty common with
cartoon characters. Look at a comic strip some day. And of all the things
in the universe to complain about, and the tons of things at our web site,
you are irritated about "big noses?" I also note that you don't seem to
care that the only non-Jewish character thus far in the cartoon strip
is a pig. This isn't reasonable balance for you? Are you going to accuse
us of anti-goyim racism for this? I don't think so. Let the goy be a pig,
no problem. Right?
RABBI: As far as the Talmud, before you continue
your outcry about Judaism vs. Modernism, first demonstrate to me that
modern values are the standard by which all things are to be judged, unless
you can do that, then your denunciations are based merely upon unproven
a priori assumptions of liberalism (pan-humanism).
RESPONSE: I don't understand what you are stating
here. Are you saying that "modern values" are NOT the "standard by which
all things are to be judged?" Could you please elaborate? Once I understand
what you are attempting to assert, I'll give you a response.
RABBI: Then again you probably won't bother
to respond to a " Jewish parasite" like me.
RESPONSE: I don't know if you are a "parasite" or
not. I don't know if you are good, or bad, or fat, or skinny, or handsome,
or ugly? Does one of our cartoons say that you are a "parasite?" I don't
recall that we have satirized any Rabbi Colemans.
RABBI: so if your a man, then respond to
me. Am Yisrael Chai! Rabbi Alex J. Coleman
RESPONSE: My dear, rabbi. I would be happy to carry on a reasoned exchange
with you about cartoons, ethics, morality, and the facts of Jewish identity,
history, Israel, or whatever you'd like. It's very difficult to find someone
of Jewish heritage who is willing to have such a discussion. Welcome!
Tell us where we're wrong. [THE RABBI EVAPORATES]
I just took a look at your site. Fantastic job! I liked especially the
sections on Catholicism and on Art. I still have a lot of reading to do.
(KB)
Very entertaining. We must suppress the Jews. After all, they are planning
a massive take over of the known world. I hear they're planning to take
over European economy, press, and political parties. From my understanding,
they even have minutes of the Jewish Protocols of Elders! Watch out
for those sneaky Jews! They eat good, Christian babies. They're no good
for nothing money thieves with big noses and hunched backs. G-d save
us all. Notice the sarcasm? Like I said before, very entertaining. (JD)
This issue is not "big noses," "hunched
backs," or any of your other categories of "entertainment."You
are not responding to anything posted at the web site. You are apparently
responding to the echo of your own illusions about what is posted at
Jewish Tribal Review. What knowledge do you have that something actually
posted at the web site isn't TRUE?
THE JOSEPH LIEBERMAN CANDIDACY http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/powers2.htm
Hello, I've read this article and I think I found a factual error. I
could not find a page on the internet, besides yours, that mentions
this: "Jewish political influence is so blatant that in 1997, Larry
Grossman, director of AIPAC, the lobbying agency for Israel, merely
moved over to become Chairman of the Democratic Party." a search for
"larry grossman" and "democratic party" or AIPAC in Google or Alltheweb
produces no results of relevance. Is there a spelling mistake or is
the statement simply false ? Since Mr.Powers' article is, besides this
sentence, very good, I think it's important to correct this possible
factual error because one might be tempted to dismiss other factual
statements made in the article if the Grossman/AIPAC-Democratic Party
link turns out to be false. After all, I don't have the time to verify
every of the end notes so credibility is important." (S)
The error has been corrected. The name is STEVE
Grossman, not Larry. Thank you bringing it to my attention.
I have only recently discovered your site and was delighted to see
that you had fixed on the "tribalism" aspect of Jewish culture as was
so concisely outlined by Kevin MacDonald in his works. Given the inevitable
criticisms you face for being so brave as to focus on Jewish tribalism,
would it be helpful if you were to expand the site with some subsidiary
examinations of other brands of tribalism? This may go a long way towards
addressing the concerns of people who, by now, have been conditioned
to reflexively assume that you must be engaging in some imaginary crime
called 'anti-semitism.' For example, a brief commentary explaining that
Jewish tribalism and the Hindu caste system share many of the same characteristics
might be helpful. Another example that springs to mind is the Japanese
contempt for and legalized suppression of the Ainu minority. Nascent
Black tribalism in American, which is a kind of weak imitation of Jewish
tribalism, may be a good example for this purpose. By pointing out that
it is the hateful and dangerous consequences of tribalism that suppress
dreams of individual liberty all over the world, and that Jewish tribalism
just happens to be the brand that is causing the most harm to the American
melting-pot and to what is left of post-Enlightenment Europe, you may
accomplish two more things on your already wonderful work-in-progress:
1) demonstrate even more conclusively your own bona fides as people
of goodwill and thereby enhance the persuasiveness of your analyses
of Jewish tribalism; 2) filter out erswhile supporters who themselves
have tribalist aspirations and for whom anti-Jewishness is just part
of their own group-agenda. Finally, it may be hopefulness on my part
more than fact, but my impression is that you all share my desire to
revitalize the public allegiance which was once given to the ideal of
the American melting-pot, and for that I thank you. In my view the American-melting
pot is THE social experiment which will determine the success or failure
of all that so many people have fought for since "The Rights of Man"
first gained traction. Jewish tribalism will not be disarmed in the
USA absent a more generalized attack on tribalism itself in America.
Other brands of tribalism, in other places, will never be diminished,
or even contained, until American society rights itself and becomes
a clear voice insisting on Strict Fairness instead of tribal favoritism.
Your work is important. God bless you and good luck. Let me know how
one may make a monetary contribution to your efforts if that would be
helpful. (JD)
I am a journalist. The 30 chapters of "When Victims Rule" is an extraordinary
collection and effort. Whoever put it together knows his/her subject matter.
However, clearly it value is not to be read on-line, but to be downloaded
for off-line reading. It is here I would offer some criticism as the html
file on-line is not good. Lines are truncated, etc.. When I downloaded
the chapters and converted them to ASCII there were strings of accented
characters and wierd formatting. This is a monumental work. Could it not
also be available as a zipped ascii file? It's important that folks be
able to download this stuff and have it readable in just a DOS editor.
Perhaps, you could make an ASCII CD of your entire site and sell it??
This info needs to be distributed widely before the `hate police' shut
you down..... (B)
Thanks for your comments. The task is to penetrate
the extraordinary socialization process which declares that it is immoral
to even begin to look at troubling evidence about the Jewish community.
How does one penetrate this wall? It's a very, very difficult task; too
many well-meaning people tend to reject an investigation like ours without
even reading it. And when the evidence aligned is colossal in scope, it's
even harder to get people to take the time to investigate such material.
(We live in a "talking head" world where the audience wants everything
in 15 seconds, no? How can you prove that we have a problem in the West
with Jewish/Zionist hegemony in a brief sound bite, when popular convention
dictates this community is immune from criticism?) It takes some kind
of personal spark to get the openness process going. This happened to
me, in that I saw Jewish racism, on large scale, first hand and then began
to realize the profound double standards that are popularly applied: one
standard for Jews and, then, one for everyone else. That's where the web
site came from, pushing a rock up the resistant mountain, bringing to
people the information they don't want to hear. But NEED to. (This, of
course, applies to Jews THEMSELVES). Per your technical suggestions: the
Jewish Tribal Review doesn't have much in the way in resources, and that
means technical ones too. Its only resource is the truth. It's a moral
enterprise, not a profit-seeking one, nor a "hating" one. A cyberspace
volunteer from France has offered to put When Victims Rule in pdf form
-- we'll see if it happens. The idea is that at some point grass roots
linkages among concerned people (like you) will aid in bringing the issues
at hand to a broader audience. Once you understand the issues at stake
here, your moral duty, as a journalist (or anything else), is to spread
the word -- however you can. If you don't do it, who will? If I don't
do it, who will? Justice and true "free speech" isn't something that arrives
of its own accord. We all must struggle for these things. There are no
personal benefits for the establishment and maintenance of the Jewish
Tribal Review, whatsoever. But someone MUST do it.
Your research is incredible-and, yes indeed ..'this
book is much,and crucially merited'. For reasons that will be clear(on
tape) I have been researching anti-judaism going on 5 years. It is curious
that I only hit upon your site 2 weeks ago.I have downloaded THE BOOK
on hard drive and on paper..just in case.Your work, combined with 'jew
watch' and MacDonald''s seminal 'trilogy' together with Henry Ford's
'international jew' pretty well sais it all ... As of now-I have also
down loaded his complete site...just in case. NB: I am very much against
all major religions in general and the Billy Joe Bob-redneck- white
supremists in particular-save for the fact they-and the buddhists-for
example are not running my country, city and wallet.For now , I (THERE
ARE A FEW MILLION OF A ME) will adhere to the old premis that 'the enemy
of my enemy is my friend'. As x-semi pro athelete-hockey in particular,
I am in the process of sending copies of the segment on 'jews control
of sport' to every major sport journalist and TV personality in Toronto
and Montreal-including the French-as well as to 'key' coaches, general
managers-including WAYNE GRETZKY,as well as BOBBY HULL, JEAN BELIVEAU(
who should be commissioner of the NHL) BOBBY ORR,PHIL ESPISITO, TED
LINDSAY etc etc to name but a few of the who's who in the hockey world
with political clout-ALL OF WHOM are royally pissed off with the american=jewish
cancer inflicting our national sport/passion-but can't -as yet 'come
out' .Until now--even I had no idea as to the EXTENT they control !!
I do indeed have some insider information to share via my 'unique' past
-both in Montreal, where I was born and bred-3rd generation for 37 years
then relocated to Toronto 20 years ago. I 'married into' judaism and
lived as a jew-for want of a better expression for 4 years....the longest
10 years of my life. I 'look' jewish-italian etc....so I can 'pass'.
I will share what I have learned-experienced and KNOW on TAPE with emphasis
on the almost complete control of Toronto=Ontario BY JEWS who now #
close to 240,000 and counting as they continue to arrive by the plane
load from russia via israel. NB: the russian=jewish mob is becoming
a major player here-and I know some of the detail.Beyond media-the other
factor I wish to convey- in detail, concerns realestate and BAY ST.
How-where do I get this info to you folks? Beyond the above-I am also
prepared to support this site=$ within my means.Simple as that. ps;
a Canadian is an American with a medical plan and no gun. (P)
Below are two emails to us from author Joe Gelman about a citation of
his (in the "Jewish Crime" chapter of When Victims Rule), and
the Jewish Tribal Review's reply.
Dear Mr.Ladies/Gentlemen,
On August 31st I respectfully requested that you remove a quote attributed
to me from your web page (the text of that e-mail can be found below).
I requested that you remove the quote from me because it was taken out
of context completely and thus is used to purposefully mislead and give
credibility to a segment of your e-publication in a dishonest and deceitful
manner. You have not removed my quote and you have failed to respond to
my request to explain your reason. You are hereby notified that legal
action will be taken against you should you fail to respond to this request
within 30 days.
Respectfully, Joe Gelman
Text of previous communication: To Whom It May Concern, I have noticed
in your e-book "When Victims Rule," in Chapter 9 "Jewish Crime," you have
referenced a quote attributed to me. This is the quote: " As Joe Gelman
noted in 1999, "A number of these sin-palace operators are Jewish and
strong supporters of Israel." [GELMAN, p. 15B]. I am asking that you remove
this quote attributed to me from your book because it is mistakenly or
purposefully used out of context and is thus inaccurate, misleading and
dishonest. The quote that you reference comes from an article that appeared
in the Las Vegas Review Journal dated Friday, December 31, 1999. The article
from which you quote me is clearly written from the perspective of how
an Islamic radical bent on an act of terrorism might view Las Vegas as
a tempting target. Your selective quote from my article makes it appear
as if this is my perspective. My article reads: "In the eyes of many,
especially in the devout Islamic world, Las Vegas represents a moral abomination.
As the warped logic might go: If America is the "Great Satan" and Americans
are cultural and capitalist "infidels," then Sin City USA by default represents
something of an epicenter of all that is evil on this earth: A wretchedly
decadent and wicked place where humanity is corrupted by temptations of
flesh and spirit -- a place of illusions and false hope, where scantily
clad cocktail waitresses push free intoxicating drinks on patrons lured
by rigged games of chance, appealing to the twin vices of greed and lust.
In short, a real Sodom and Gomorrah. That so many "infidels" are drawn
to such a place serves to confirm how depraved and corrupting Western
society and culture actually is. The fact that a number of these sin-palace
operators are Jewish and strong supporters of Israel only makes it worse."
Please note that I clearly stated that I view this perspective as "warped
logic," and I reinforce my view later in the article which you can read
in its entirety at http://www.lvrj.com/lvrj_home/1999/Dec-31-Fri-1999/opinion/12651864.html.
Therefore I politely ask that you remove my quote from your book as it
is clearly used in a context that is selective, inaccurate and misleading.
I thank you for your prompt action in this matter.
Sincerely, Joe Gelman
************************
Dear Mr. Gelman:
Thank you for your emails. Sorry for the delay in response, but the
Jewish Tribal Review webmaster has been away for a while, and has just
returned. (Nothing has peen posted at -- or deleted from -- JTR since
late May til this current October week, as you might find after an examination
of it). The aim of the web site is to be as accurate as possible and
your response to our excerpt from your article is appreciated. After
some discussion, however, we think your silly accusation that our intention
is to "purposefully mislead" is somewhat libelous. Here's
the way we see it, and here's what we're going to do:
First, this is what you wrote, and this is how we excerpted it from
your context (about "Islamic radicals") into ours (Las Vegas
and Jewish crime): "... a number of these sin-palace operators
are Jewish and strong supporters of Israel ..." Your original sentence
says this: "The fact that a number of these sin-palace operators
are Jewish and strong supporters of Israel only makes it worse."
Now, please note that you state clearly that it is a FACT (you, the
author state this as your perspective, NOT that this information is
really a falsehood proclaimed by an "Islamic radical"). Please
read the paragraph source that you provide of the sentence in question,
again. YOU (not an "Islamic radical") are stating that it
is a FACT that "these sin-palace operators" "are Jewish"
AND are "strong supporters of Israel." After some discussion
at our end, it seems your complaint can only rest with the modifier
you use: "sin-palace." In other words, the FACT you yourself
state is that the Jews who "operate" many of the Las Vegas
establishments are also supporters of Israel. You apparently (?) ascribe
to "Islamic radicals" the notion that Las Vegas includes "sin
palaces." Hence, the grounds for your complaint (and threat), we
can only imagine, is that you don't like the word "sin-palace,"
despite the "fact" that 1) you use the word yourself, and
2) "Sin City" is a common term for Las Vegas (we think most
Americans, when presented the term "Sin City," would be able
to correctly identify which American metropolis this nomer best represents).
Am I correct in understanding that your complaint to us is that you
don't see Las Vegas and its reputation as a center for gambling, prostitution,
the criminal underworld, etc., as in any way representing "sin?"
Am I correct in assuming that this is an accurate expression of your
value system? In other words, we are trying to determine what exactly
in the sentence under discussion does not represent a "fact"
to you, despite the fact that you blatantly introduce the information
in the sentence as "fact" (which makes "it worse"
because "Islamic radicals" will put these facts into their
own context that you don't like, no?) "Facts" don't ever change,
of course; but the perspective does -- which is the essence of critical
inquiry, whether by "Islamic radicals" or not. Anyone has
the right to use any facts you proclaim to buttress their OWN argument).
If we are correct here in our assessment about the specifics of your
complaint, is the following excerpt the one that would make you happy?
: "a number of these ... operators are Jewish and strong supporters
of Israel ..." Of course, there may well then be for some a negative
connotation associated with the word "operator," but if you
insist upon controlling to your specifications all uses of your commentary,
you invite quite a surreal scenario, no? Are you implicitly trying to
control not only context, Mr. Gelman (people must apparently agree with
you to excerpt your commentary), but MEANING itself? Must we agree to
your assessment of "Islamic radicals" to quote you about anything,
including Las Vegas, Jews, and Israel? Actually, Sir, it's not really
the "sin-palace" modifier that we were interested in, by quoting
you. Your ACCURATE and FACTUAL commentary about Jewish supporters of
Israel at the helm of many Las Vegas establishments was/is merely a
nice capstone for all the information accumulated in our chapter that
included various citations about Jews and Las Vegas and the very FACTS
you mention. We think people can decide for themselves whether Las Vegas
represents "sin" or not, and they can also decide for themselves
what exactly your aim is in defaming our efforts at the Jewish Tribal
Review.
So what are we going to do? In the interests of truth, "facts,"
and accuracy, and further explication of this issue, the Jewish Tribal
Review will soon post this exchange with you (and any future dialogue)
as a link at the excerpt of yours we quote in the "Jewish Crime"
section, and we'll also post all this at our "Letters to the Editor"
section. We think the public can decide what exactly your complaint
to us represents.
In fact, our basic position is that nothing on the Internet is etched
in stone. That's it's beauty. If we've got information wrong, we want
to set it right. Your complaint to us will be incorporated into the
web site, viewers can examine it, and this kind of exchange with Jewish
complainers is really quite welcome as an important part of the web
site itself. Further commentary and explication about anything you'd
like is of course welcome. We'll post it -- and reply -- in the name
of the sharpest of accuracies. And, oh, by the way. Have you written
any critical commentary about "Jewish radicals" lately? We'd
like to see it.
*******************
Thank you for your response. Although I prefer that this quote be omitted
from your e-publication, "Jewish Crime" because I believe you use my
quote out of context and in a misleading manner, I never-the-less accept
your reasonable solution of placing a link that notes my protest and
the reason for it. Indeed, with such a link, your readers can make up
their own mind.
Joe Gelman
It seems most reporters don't think anything is wrong will this bias
in the media.I thought you might find this quote interesting. Here is
the most open comment I have found on this topic ( I transcribed it
myself from a Nightline show): "Hitchens wanted to choose his words
carefully because talk of a Jewish lobby is another one of those dangerous
topics, it's dangerous for Jews because it feeds the imaginations of
real anti-Semites who believe in a world wide Jewish conspiracy. It's
dangerous for those who would discuss Jewish political influence because
they risk the charge of anti-Semitism. It's not like when you talk about
lobbying organizations for say immigrants or the disabled or the Saudi
Government for that matter. History, sensitivity and politics make talk
of Israel and its supporters different and alot more complicated. I'm
John Donvan for Nightline in Washington." -broadcast 4/17/02 ABC's Nightline
I think this quote highlights what you are saying, but notice that the
reporter doesn't say this shouldn't be this way! I am working on getting
the truth out and creating a truly Representative Press. (Representative Press) Please visit
my web site which is a work in progress. Please e-mail me if you have
any questions. (MR)
Great site...and thanks for the in-depth analysis of Hollywood. I was
extremely interested in the expose' on the Jewish psychoanalysis of Marilyn
Monroe...I'd call it a definite "smoking gun" considering how she died...
Question: Are you guys located in California? I'm trying to get a current
representation of Jewish media control other than what I see rolling by
on the credits after shows LOL Do you have a list of the membership of
the Screenwriters' Guild, or similar lists? I have a program obtained
from www.hoozajew.com that will analyze the names and determine who is
Jewish LOL (M)
Greetings from Flanders / Belgium. Just a short note to say thank you.
A balanced site on the jewish question like yours was needed. There is
an almost complete media ban here on the jewish power. I will pass your
URL around. As far as the jews go, well, their numbers are droping all
over - except Israel-, and looking at history, I would not be so arrogant
if I we're them. The holocaust thing is coming to an end, they are now
at the top of their power and that will not last. They will probably push
out the Palestinians to Jordan but public opinion starts to turn against
them. Not that that alone will do it but it sure isn't positive for them.
If you look at history, in the end, it always turned out the wrong way
for them, it is just a matter of time. Best wishes, N
GREAT JOB! Incredible! The amount of information you have collected is
staggering and I am reading a little bit ever day. I consider it a matter
of personal survival to educate myself on this vital subject which has
such a powerful effect on every aspect of my life. I have been hurt by
Jewish arrogance and disguised hatred in the past and was naive and confused
not believing my feelings. After reading your site I realize that my body
was telling me something real and I am starting to understand the historical
context where these people are coming from. If you are adding more material,
a topic I am especially interesting in is the Jewish domination of the
therapy industry and how this is being used to destroy minds and corrupt
our culture. (RS)
Fantastic web site! Keep up the good work. (D)
Jews in the Bulgarian Government and at other high political positions
at the moment: 1/ Simeon Sax-Koburgotta - Prime Minister 2/ Nikolai Vassilev
- Vice Premier, Minister of Economy 3/ Milen Velchev - Minister of Finance
(1/4 Jew, wife - a Jew) 4/ Solomon Passi - Minister of Foreign Affairs
5/ Dolores Arsenova - Minister of Environment and Waters 6/ Lidija Shuleva
- Minister of Social "Cares" 7/ Vladimir Atanasov, Minister of Education.
Leaders of two Parlaimentary Parties: 1/ Sergei Stanishev - leader of
the Bulgarian "Socialist" Party 2/ Nadezda Mihailova - leader of UDF -
Union of "Democratic" Forces; Minister of Foreign Affars during the 1999
Bombing of Yugoslavia; she handed the fabricated so-called "Serb" plan
"Podkova" (pure Bulgarian word! The Serb word is "Podkoviza"!!!) to Sharping,
Germany, to justify the aggression!... Others: Stefan Sofianski - Sofia
Mayor for 8 years Media: 1/ Andrei Raichev - Director of the daily "Sega"
2/ Viza Nedjalkova, his wife - Head of Radio "Net" 3/ Emil Kalo - Economic
Director of the daily "Trud", Head of the Bulgarian Branch of the Zionistic
organization "Shalom" 4/ Tatjana Vaksberg - Radio "Svobodna Evropa", passionate
anti-Bulgarian, creator of anti-Bulgarian film And many MANY -others...
Latest News: A Zionistic delegation from Israel in Bulgaria at the moment
is "blackmailing" the "Bulgarian" government with demands to be given
the Centre of Sofia (central Sofia real estate) - otherwise They will
not support Bulgaria's application for a NATO membership... Easy question:
Will Israeli delegation receive what They want? (Look at trhe names and
positions above...) (D)
Hello! On your page you say "if a host web site uses a design structure
called "frames," a direct link from here to the article isn't possible."
That's not so. If you use the Opera browser you can right-click on the
frame and get the address of the material appearing there. I'm sure there
are other methods. You also say "Even if an article has been taken off
the Internet since it was posted here, it can often be found by doing
a google.com search, using a phrase from the article, finding the correct
result, and then clicking the "cached" selection." As webmaster you can
enter the dead URL into http://www.archive.org/, find links to the article
itself in the Internet Archive, and link to the most recent. Users can
of course do the same thing. (JK)
YOUR SITE AND YOU ARE SICK PEOPLE. WHY DON'T YOU CONVERTED YOUTSELF
TO JUDAISM IF YOU SO JELOUS TO JEWS AND THEIR "POWER" IN THIS WORLD
????????? mohammed ali
Subject: correction: misattributed author.
Hi, I was just browsing your site and was pleased to find you quoted my
words, but unfortunately with someone else's name. The title is wrong
too. the correct author, title should read:
Rhonda Lieberman, 'Jewish Barbie', in 'Too Jewish?; Rutgers University
Press, l996, p. 108.
Please correct this on your site. I'll check back to see if you did it.
Thank you! Rhonda Lieberman
http://jewishtribalreview.org/jinf.htm
[Ms. Lieberman then cites her quotation in question,
and JTR's attribution:] "In the century of Calvin Klein, Ralph
Lauren, and Dinah Shore, need we ask who but a Jew is best a packaging
unwhining blonde fantasy figures? I don't know about you, darlings, but
ever since I found out that Kathie Lee Gifford was nee-Epstein, I don't
assume anything. Why be surprised then, that Barbie, the ultimate shiksa
goddess, was invented by a nice Jewish lady, Ruth Handler (with her husband
Eliot, co-founder of Mattel?) Indeed, the famous snub-nosed plastic ideal
with the slim hips of a drag queen is in fact named after a real Jewish
princess from L.A., Handler's daughter, Barbara (who must have been hell
to know in high school!) Her brother's name was Ken."
Karen Brodkin, How Jews Became White Folks, Rutgers University Press,
1998, p. 143
Thank you Ms. Lieberman.
I suspect you speak with sarcasm, but, who knows? Perhaps you are someone
with an open mind.
Per the error. Sorry. We're human. The citation is changed. We haven't
got teams of editors around and we make mistakes. I don't have Brodkin's
book immediately handy, but she must have quoted you. I have no doubt
that, at our enormous web site, there are inevitably more such oversights
and typos. And as they are discovered, we will correct them. If at any
point you'd like to discuss, or challenge, information or ideas at the
web site (we're of course critical of the Jewish community), I'd welcome
it. Part of JTR's intent is to elicit dialogue (or, say, reasoned debate)
with members of the Jewish community. JTR has been up a few months, and
few have been game so far. Aside from the knee-jerk smear of "prejudice/anti-Semitism,"
there hasn't been much from the Jewish community. (The important exception
is a young gentlemen whose father is Jewish who has stated his willingness
to write an article for us about some of the contradictions in Jewish
identity, especially per the Palestinian question). We would ask, however,
that, if you should ever consider it, such exchange be public information,
for you, for us, and for anyone.
Of course, we need to hear if citations, etc. are in error, but what we're
really looking for are discussions about social and political issues regarding
the Jewish community. My sense is that it's time for these discussions
to begin. As Israel and the U.S. square off with the Islamic world, in
a world of "terrorism" the issues JTR raises are going to be surfacing
in American culture more and more often. And not just at our web site.
Guaranteed. Perhaps you understand this? Thanks again.
J
Oh, by the way. We've got an avalanche of further material at our web
site that supports your quote (Jewish influence in the creation of the
illusory ideals of American culture).
Also, while we're at it, perhaps to whet your appetite for discussion:
I'm familiar with the etymology of the term "shiksa" and its implications.
I'm wondering if you have any thoughts about that in your use of this
pejorative Yiddish term. If someone used the term "kike goddess" or "nigger
goddess," or the like, even in a context similar to your own, what would
your response be? Would you yourself use those terms? If you use "shiksa
goddess," why would you not use these others? You see, this is one of
the reasons for our web site: to point these discrepancies out -- a dual
moral standard which is endemic to modern society. I do not mean to be
hostile, sincerely. But I DO mean to be direct. If I am mistaken in my
assertions here, please correct me.
I JUST WANTED YOU TO KNOW THAT I HAVE TRULY ENJOYED YOUR WEB SITE
THESE LAST FEW MONTHS......I AM SORRY THAT IT IS NOW NOT AVAILABLE.
PLEASE ALERT ME IF YOU REOPEN YOUR WEBSITE...... (JC)
Thanks for the compliment. Or, I guess, the eulogy.
But we're still here.
WE OWN EVERYTHING AND THERES NOT A THING YOU CAN DO ABOUT IT! [RB]
I thought I would commend on your site, particularly your effort to highlight
the double-standards that exist within the west surrouding issues to do
with Jewish influence and Israel. My background is (primarily) of Jewish
origin (that is, my Dad's Jewish; my mother's grandmother was Jewish).
Therefore, I know first hand how Jewish identity is shaped by an extreme
identification with Judaism, about the ensuing victimization complex and
how this complex has acted to rationalize the continued oppression and
exploitation of Palestinian people as well as the existence of an almost
(criminal like) Jewish influence over all spheres of Western society (e.g.,the
media, academia, and popular culture) . And, of course, these two issues
should by no means be separated. Without this Jewish influence, there
would be no Israel. And without Israel, there would be no displaced Palestinians,
no Jewish settlement expansion, no billions of dollars in U.S. subsidies
to Israel, etc. To openly discuss these issue is to cross the parimetres
of permittable discourse, namely, is to be labeled an "anti-Semite". The
spectre of antisemitism (or "self-hatred") is so powerful that it haunts
relations within my own family. For example, I'm unable to discuss the
middle-east with my father for fear of him lashing out at me. Israel,
according to him, is primarily (albeit, not always) the victim of 'Arab
intransigence'.This is coming from the mouth of someone who purports to
be a "social democrat", that is, positioned on the side of the political
spectrum that has traditionally opposed imperialism, chauvinism, racism,
or exploitation of any sort. Not so when it comes to Israel, however.
According to his beleifs (which, of course, are derived from the larger
Jewish collective) Israel is a "democracy" -- pure and simple. Indeed,
Israel is one of the 'most democratic, western democracies' [sic!] on
the face of the planet. Irrespective of the treatment accorded to Palestinians
by the IDF or the Mossad, for instance, the collective punishment of Palestinian
civilians (e.g., 24-hour curfews, bulldozing of homes), the expulsion
of Palestinian civilians, or the extra-judicial slaying of Palestinian
'militants' (or "terrorists", as they're apt to be labeled in the Zionist
backed/bought[!] media), Israel can do no harm. Perhaps, extreme is its
polices, perhaps, at times, 'a tad' paranoid (albeit, "justified" in this
paranoia), yet, never guilty of crimes against humanity. Indeed, according
Jewish (or Western) diktat, it is impossible for Jews to be the aggressors.
Only the reactors. That is, Jewish people are incapable of aggressive
behaviour unless first "provoked" into action (namely, into "defending"
themselves). These "facts" are considered 'indisputable' with mainstream
society, as is the impression that Jews were the only victims of the holocaust.
Nor are Jews capable of what might be aptly referred to as "racism", or
even "genocide". No, no, no . Jews are untouched by the 'genocidal urge'.
On the other hand, everyone else, it would seem, (in some degree or another)
is genetically predisposed towards genocide, to exert racism, or (what
is the ultimate symbol of Jewish identity) to express "anti-Semitism".
(CB)
great sight thank you thank you thank you i have learn so much you done
an excellent job. thank you (MS)
Hello, My ulcer grows daily at the overt actions , I
want to help.
P.S. I know nsa has read this (D)
First of all, I'd like to congratulate you on your work. I think that
there are many issues from which one can understand the status of jews
and judaism.
I have few questions that I would like to ask concerning the "wealth
of jews in the US" with respect to the "wealth of WASPs."
1--What is the jewish share of the US GDP?
2--What is the WASP share of the US GDP?
3--How many leading American Banks are in the hands and how many are under
the influence of WASPs?
4--Why weren't the jews capable of reaching the US Presidency?
5--Why are the overwhelming number of US Presidents of British descent?
6--How many Jewish CEO's are found in the HOOVER 500 or Fortune 500 Companies
and how many WASPs?
7--What is the accumilated wealth of the WASP establishment in the US?
8--What is the the extent of Jewish representation in the following economic
sectors(in comparison to WASPs):Oil,Steel,Automobiles,Defense Industries,Space
Industries,Ships, and Computers. (RS)
Thanks for the commentary. Of course your questions
are a criticism/challenge to The Jewish Tribal Review, and that's good.
In response, first, this is the JEWISH Tribal Review, not the WASP Power
Clearinghouse. If you'd like to start a web site about WASPs, you should
do it. We don't have everything under the sun here. However, we do have
some information (that you've neglected to cite from our site) that has
relevancy to your commentary. 1/2) Jewish/WASP GDP? Who knows. But as
early as 1955 a researcher found that Jewry at-large accounted for 10%
of America's total personal income [WEYL, 1968, p. 173], over-represented
by about 400%. And things have gotten better for Jews since then, not
worse, no? So the Jewish chunk of the GDP would be an interesting study,
but I'm sure the Jewish community wouldn't want anyone to know the results.
3) Don't know (Richard Rosenberg became the CEO of Bankamerica in 1990,
though.). A useful parallel question though is: How many Jews are financiers
and are involved in INVESTMENT banking and hostile takeovers (Milken,
Steinberg, Perlman, etc.)? See our chapter 21. 4) Per Jews being "capable
of reaching the US Presidency": Joseph Lieberman, an Orthodox Jew
(an anti-universalist, anti-intermarriage, etc.) is possibly poised to
become the next US president. And why do Jews need the Presidency when
they have profound influence throughout government anyway (see our Government
chapters. "He that pays the piper calls the tune.") 6) Please
see our lists of Jews on the Forbes "richest" list. It will
knock your socks off. (In 1999, Jews -- as 2.5% of the American population,
constituted 45% of the richest 40 Americans). 7) Don't know. Look it up.
But the point is there have been investigations of WASP wealth, but nothing
comparable about the Jewish community, which doesn't want attention called
to this subject. 8) Jews are well-represented in the fields you mention.
The Crown family is Jewish, and owns controlling shares in General Dynamics,
one of this country's largest weapons manufacturing corporations. The
Jewish founders of the Hirshhorn Museum and Guggenheim Museum grew rich
with mining interests. Zionist Ira Rennert owns giant Renco, which includes
the Magnesium Corporation of America. Computers? Steve Ballmer (mother
Jewish) is the CEO of Microsoft, hailed by Jewish groups as the richest
Jew in America. Arnold Grove (Holocaust survivor) founded and headed Intel
til he recently retired. Michael Dell owns the Dell computer company.
Lawrence Ellison heads Oracle. Sandy Lerner heads Cisco Systems. Stanley
Kalms heads England largest Internet provider, Freeserve. Lawrence Pearlman
heads Seagate. Benjamin Rosen headed Compaq Computer. Beny Alagem headed
Packard Bell NEC. Mitchell Kapor heads Lotus. Mark Cuban sold Broadcast.com
for millions. Terry Semel in the CEO of Yahoo! Etc. Just for corporate
sampling (and these are current or recent chiefs): Jerry Greenberg heads
McDonalds, Joseph Cullman heads Phillip Morris, Charles Hurwitz heads
Maxxam, Gerald Greenwalt heads United Airlines, Reuben Marks heads Colgate
Palmolive, Steve Goldstone heads RJR Nabisoco, etc. Oil? Marathon Oil
was Max Fisher's baby. Total Fina is Israeli. Marcus Bearsted founded
the company that became Shell Oil. Jacob Blaustein founded Amoco. Etc.
Etc. Etc.There's much, much more. Please see chapter 21 for many more
such people, and perhaps your own research can help us add more to the
list.
I am wondering...are the webmasters of the site
"Jewish Tribal Review" jews themselves? Seems like it...but I could be
wrong. (SS)
you fucking muslims. your undercover attempt is all too
obvious. you, the fucked up muslims of the world stand no chance. the
Jews, a successful minority has flourished anywhere in the world, unlike
you trite muslim bastards. what about the main question: how the hell
did the jews get so much power? try to answer that without giving nazi
explanation. the frustration you express, being a part of the vast,
ignorant, retard religion, is quite clear. unfortunately for you, you
will never have the means to hurt us.
FYI, every ethnic minority holds the same characteristics--korean, chinese...etc...but
only the jews made it that big. you claim you are not anti-senite but
still come up with understated "research" conclusions about
the jewish nature. anyway, we are here, we fucked you before, and we
will always fuck you!! (yohayl)
Will you be able to eventually place your online book "When Victims
Rule ..." on compact disc? This would be an excellent resource to
study offline.Do you know when the photo gallery and the list of links
will be made available? Thanks for all your efforts. [WC]
[FROM FRANCE] I have found some weeks before your bokk, and your site.
Great. I am a french journalist and director of a small paper about politics
and lobbies, especially jews. [ER]
Thank you for putting all the time and effort needed to compile all this
information about that compelling subject. (qs)
[FROM IRELAND] In the government section of the book, you mention ireland
and the briscoe family. There are currently two jewish members of the
parliament_ ben briscoe and alan shatter, in the fianna fail and fine
gael parties. There was mervin taylor in the labour party for many years.
there was until recently a high court judge -- henry barron. I don't think
these numbers are disproportionate to the jewish population percentage.
I'd reckon it's a couple thousand, out of a population of only 3,something
million. The book is a fascinating read. (DM)
[FROM FRANCE] I spent the last 4 days in a "theme" park where I went with
my two children my wife and... about 400 pages that I printed from your
online book. I read everything and ended with the main subject : media
influence. In the cottage I rented, one magazine was left that I hadn't
read for a long time, an "intellectual" one, created some fifteen years
ago by a well-known french gentile, Bernard Pivot. on the first page,
the editorial (?) was from a mr Assouline (jew), editor in chief; the
last page was written by a mr Grumberg (jew) and was about "Amen", a movie
against the alleged silence of pope Pius XII during last war (of course
mr Grumberg found this movie excellent). The main pages started with 4
pages devoted to Stefan Zweig (jew), international pages were made by
a mr Levy, and so on: more than 23 pages were either written by jews or
about jews. I felt quite depressed about what I discovered ... I'll send
you a few corrections on different matters about french and jews. One
I can already tell you is that you are wrong (at least in France) when
you write (first page of chapter 21, "Money, class and power"): "When
jews make the news for being in trouble with the law, they are more often
freely identified as jews in european press than in the USA..." In this
country, there's only one case where medias use the word "jewish", in
the group "peuple juif" (jewish people), meaning Israelians. As an example,
we have had, in the previous months, two very important affairs where
almost all persons " being in trouble with the law " were jewish : one
in the "Sentier", the oldest and main jewish place in Paris, where 80
people were involved in stealing money from the french government using
a very complicated trick involving israeli banks and false receipts; the
second was about weapons sales to african countries and a part of the
money being given to political parties. In these two affairs the main
acting people fled to israel to avoid being caught by police: although
israeli banks and the fact that people fled to Israael were mentioned,
I NEVER read in the newspapers as I didn't hear on radio or on TV that
one of these person was a "JEW". Neutral words were always used, not "Jew"
This word is almost forbidden (maybe it has a copyright) and it seems
that only jews are allowed to use it. (DN)
[FROM FRANCE] As I'm not american, it's not easy for me to fond the right
words to tell you how much I enjoy your web site ! It's great, objective,
and not extremist : just plain truth. Bravo! Go ahead! (DN)
I can't overemphasize the importance of your work. I salute you from the
bottom of my heart and heartily commend your work and courage. We, the
persecuted goyim of the World, are yearning for voices to speak out in
our behalf and expose the long repressed truth. As gentile Muslims, we
haven't only experienced the persecution, deception, hypocrisy, legalized
robbery, institutionalized looting, predatory usury, and lies of the Jews,
but like our brothers and sisters in Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Germany,
and many other parts of the the world, we have experienced Jewish terrorism,
murdering, assassination, death, destruction, butchering, massacres, genocides,
dispossession, house demolishing, medicine deprivation, siege, apartheid,
land scorching, baby bone crushing, children flesh mincing, toddler head
blowing, women and elderly limb chopping, eye gouging, skin roasting,
and here in the US, a constant and sustained campaign of harassment, defamation,
and hate instigation. Please keep up the excellent work! (A Grateful Gentile)
I am happy to learn about the existence of your site, especially since
it contains information sympathetic to the interests of Catholics &
Slavs. Keep up the good work!
(KH)
You have a very informative and balanced Web site. Congratulations! Considering
the current situation here (in the US) regarding our freedoms and also
the rapid manner in which certain Web sites seem to be "disappearing"
or in danger of, I was wondering whether you keep a list of those interested
in your Web site. If so, please add me to it because I would hate to lose
contact. Thank you.
(YF)
Congratulations on your excellent site! You even have the story on Larry
Tisch from Auletta's 'Three Blind Mice.'
(J)
(The following comment was not sent here, but rather
to a discussion forum --google.com/groups - writing.screenplays -- December
31, 2001 -- at a thread called Sal. It was elicited after postings by
JTR at that discussion forum):
I went and looked at your website. I must say it's very interesting. Historically
its some great stuff. Reminds me of the documentaries I've seen about
the mob. Very informative. And I must say that I'm a bit confused on why
you are anti-jew. You seem very well versed in judaism, it's scholars,
it's history, culture, and religion. YOu dont seem to pay any disrespect
to individuals, in fact you do use jewish scholars as your primary source.
And in terms of israel's policy toward palestine i tend to agree with
you. Don't get me wrong, I don't like my jewish friends any less now,
maybe more, considering all the cool history you've dug up. You seem to
me, considering the breadth of your research, to be a disenfranchised
Jew yourself, rather than some external obsessive. I don't agree with
you on your "jewish domination" theory, but there is some good reading
on that site, cool historical stuff, which is, surprisingly, objective.
(P)
(The following comment was not sent here, but rather
to a discussion forum [google.com/groups - Group: rec.arts.movies.production
- December 27, 2001 - at a thread called More Judeo-centrism]. It was
elicited after a posting by JTR, and the resultant debate)
Nobody else has stepped in to claim a piece of the media pie because nobody
else is allowed in. The doors only open to jews or whoever is independently
successful. In 1989 I encountered a group of young foreign tourist antisemites
in the Hollywood McDonalds, who were trying to convince a group of young
midwestern American tourists that: "Your film industry is COMPLETELY JEWISH!!!".
This inspired a telling experiment that I did in late 1989. I sent 200
copies of a letter seeking any entry level opportunity, but used two different
pseudonyms - one blatantly gentile on 100 copies and one blatantly jewish
on the other 100 copies of the letter. Without revealing the actual names
used, let's say they were "Christian Liam O'Grady" and "Brent Irving Friedman".
Well, many offers of entry level opportunities started coming in under
the jewish name, and ONLY under the jewish name. There were more than
20 positive responses. One major production company sent two scripts to
see how I would cover them, to see if they could use me as a reader. A
schlock company was ready to hire me as an assistent. Was I interested
in pursuing television animation writing at Disney Television Animation?
Two major name persons didn't offer opportunities but did sent notes of
encouragement. And one of these persons, a female, surely must rank among
Hollywood's fifty biggest names! I was stunned at the positive response!
But the other 100 letters, identical except the gentile signature, generated
not a single positive response! I've been holding onto my response letters,
and initially I investigated the possibility of self-publishing a small
book or pamphlet chronicling the experiment, and once researched self
publishing in the downtown L.A. library in the early Nineties. But then
along came the web, which is cheaper and has a larger potential audience.
I will eventually be scanning and posting every response in a tell-all
website, which Hollywood isn't likely to appreciate, given the dozens
of names that will then be exposed. One of the reasons I have not done
it yet is because I was considering repeating the experiment on a grander
scale and utilizing more precise scientific accounting of the experiment
and results. The first time was a bit sloppy - I didn't even keep track
of which letter went where. Anyhow, personally I went from being indifferent
to jews to being angry at what has irrefutably proved to me that ethnic
nepotism is massively prevalent. This cheats America out of having an
American culture factory. One has to imagine a parallel: India-Indians,
(who have the worlds biggest industry, something like 800 annual movies)
imigrate into Israel, and set up India-town neighborhoods. They then proceed
to make all of Israels movies and television shows for the Israelis, hiring
a few token Israelis to work in subservient positions. What would the
Israelis think of an Indian created national culture? One more note: An
inside source informed me that because jews have come under fire for creating
tasteless programming from conservative sectors, a secret directive suggesting
that Hollywood keep an eye out for talented tasteless gentile filmakers,
like the Farrely brothers, as a way of deflecting such criticism.
(DN)
Should not our policy in the Middle East further the interests of the
U.S.? If our policy were based on Israeli interests, we would effectively
be a colony of Israel. By virtue of 9-11, we already have been drawn into
that conflict. It is now a war being paid for by us. Our sons and daughters
must risk life and limb to fight against those who detest our policy in
that area enough to kill and die. When bin Laden is gone, others are likely
to replace him. I would like to suggest to [local newspaper editor Lee]
Fisher and others who want to enlist us as agents to explain why we need
to kill for Israel and die in the interest of Israelis. But if Palestinians
were God's "Chosen People" should we not be grateful?
(WH)
I just want to tell you how impressed I am with your Website and the wealth
of material on it. I looked at your site when it first appeared and I
liked it then, but when I just returned to it, I saw a site that had matured
to one of the best resources in the world on Jewish Supremacism.
(DE)
I have been looking over your site and you have given the Jewish community
every opportunity to express itself and your views are not unreasonable
as far as I'm concerned. Also I'm impressed that you reference your work
in an academic manner and you don't just buy into stuff like the "Protocols"
and such other trash that has been put out over the years out of hate
and true anti-Semitism.
(CC)
You're not alone.
(HH)
GREAT SIGHT!!!!!!!!!
(M)
Thank you so much for your e-mail and links to jewishtribalreview.org
It is an excellent site that I plan to make much use of in future articles.
I am pleased to see that people like you are trying to do something to
educate the U.S. about the true history of Palestine and Zionism.
(GF)
Thank you very much for recommending your excellent web site. We will
add it as a link shortly to our site. Thank you and please keep up the
good work.
(HA)
“When Victims” Rule is an amazing achievement. All you need now is a good
proof-reader to eliminate its many typos. On one small point, chapter
23 regards the British drug smuggler Howard Marks as Jewish. But if Marks
is telling the truth in his autobiography, “Mr Nice” (London, 1996), your
allegation is highly improbable. He’s from Wales, both his grandfathers
were miners, and he says that for the first five years of his life he
spoke only Welsh. Or perhaps he’s lying. (His daughter may be in Israel
-- on a kibbutz? -- but her name, Myfanwy, is bona fide Welsh.) And in
chapter 20, part 1, Stanley Clinton Davis (definitely Jewish) is a former
member of the British -- not Belgian -- Parliament. Your bibliography
lists one book by Gilles Perrault -- “The Red Orchestra”. See if you can
also locate his fascinating book, “A Man Apart: The Life of Henri Curiel”
(New Jersey, 1987), about a very rich Jew who led communist movements
in Egypt and Sudan. Henri Curiel had rivals in two other Egyptian communist
parties -- both of them led by Jews!
Best wishes, JD
Hello- Great web site. We have mentioned you on our e-list, more than
once. Here is some info below, a patch-work about gun control/Jews, that
we will be putting on our web site, when it debuts very soon. We may not
use all of it. Go ahead and use what you want, if you want to, on your
web site. JPFO (Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership), from
their web site, computer printout dated 7/25/99, titled "Ask The
Rabbi"; a "Rabbi Mermelstein" is shown commenting on Jews/gun
ownership, saying that the "concept" of privately owning guns
is (quote) "so extraordinary in the history of the Jews that many
refuse to come to terms with it, let alone embrace it. We are supposed
to be victims." (endquote). It should be noted that some gun-owners
feel that JPFO is a prime example of K. MacDonald "group evolutionary
strategy" theory regarding Jews, i.e., Jews joining the gun-rights
movement to prevent any "anti-Semitism" within that movement,
by being there in the first place. JPFO's amazing suggestion (that can
be seen in one of their small "Granpa Jack" series of pamphlets
[specifically #4 in the series], titled "Gun Control Is Racist,"1998,
by JPFO/Aaron Zelman and Richard Stevens; the cover shows a smiling Klansman
burning a pile of guns) that the KKK is behind gun control efforts, strongly
reenforces this belief about "group evolutionary strategy."------------
Many Jews run "semi-conservative" pro-gun organizations. These
are not hard-core outfits. They are politically-correct entities, attempts
by Jews to enter into the "White-guy gun culture" in order to
prevent any anti-Semitism that might crop up. They appear legit in every
way, but they also push a " bring more minorities into the pro-gun
movement and exclude any White nationalists at the same time" mentality,
which is again part of Prof. Kevin MacDonald's theory about Jews entering
previously-White domains, such as the gun-rights movement, to prevent
any possible anti-Semitism from spreading in such redneck culture. Gun
groups such as The Second Amendment Foundation (SAF), Citizen's Committee
for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms (CCRKBA) and Jews for the Preservation
of Firearms Ownership (JPFO) are all Jewish-controlled. Also interesting
is that Jewish millionaire Alan Gottlieb, head of CCRKBA, is apparently
a convicted felon (apparently he has served time for tax evasion), and
so cannot legally own a gun. Jewish gun dealer Aaron Zelman of Wisconsin,
who runs JPFO, also runs another similar outfit, called CCOPS (Concerned
Citizens Opposing Police States), a seemingly "patriotic," but
really Jewish, outfit that no doubt seeks to head off anti-Semitism in
the Patriot Movement (militias, etc.). Having seen and heard some of their
anti-nationalist, anti-White comments, we do indeed believe that they
are wolves-in-sheeps-clothing, whether they themselves even realize it
or not (MacDonald explains that some "Jewish group evolutionary strategy"
may be subconscious). ---------------------- Gun Control In America: For
years, many patriotic persons have been hearing that Jewish persons are
disproportionately involved in gun control (not surprising, as they are
disproportionately involved in other leftist causes, too.) Here are two
recent examples: In the August 2000 issue of the NRA magazine "American
Rifleman", p. 74, is a list of who sponsored the anti-gun march titled
"The Million Mom March", held in 2000. Under both "Individuals/Families"
and under "Religious Groups", Jews are disproportionately represented.
For example, there are 8 Religious Groups listed, and of the 8, 4 are
Jewish. Since Jews make up only 2.4 percent of the U.S. population (Prof.
Kevin MacDonald, book "The Culture of Critique," 1998), this is GROSSLY
disproportionate. ("True" proportion would be far less than 1 religious
group). Ditto the Individuals/Families category- about 1/3 have noticeably
Semitic names- it could be even higher, as one cannot always tell by name
alone. Again, they make up only 2.4 percent of the U.S. population. (Note
that there is indeed such a thing as a Semitic surname: Goldberg, Tannenbaum,
Silverstein, Adler, Grossman, etc.). This category is also grossly disproportionate,
being approx. 33% of the total, and possibly more. Another (even better)
example is the July 17, 2000 issue of "The New American" magazine. On
page 16 of that issue, a Jewish man named Hillel Goldstein, in an article
entitled "I Am Alive, No Thanks To Gun Control", candidly admits that
gun ownership is (quote) "extremely unpopular" (endquote) in the Jewish
community. (Note that he said "extremely"). Ask any patriotic person who
keeps his ear to the ground- he will verify this. In fact, Jewish ownership
of guns is so rare that there is an organization named"Jews For The Preservation
Of Firearms Ownership" (emphasis on "Jews"). Not "Citizens"...... Not
"Americans"...... but "Jews". (They are leftist, by the way- just read
some of their hopelessly P.C. booklets that claim the Klan is behind gun
control (Booklet #4, "Gun Control Is Racist"). The cover shows a Klansman
burning a pile of guns. Incredible. (Your average redneck Klansman owns
more guns than most people). This bit of propaganda, by itself, is rather
suspicious. If this does not convince anyone, let it be noted that, according
to the Jewish author J. J. Goldberg, in his book "Jewish Power," 1996,
all of the big anti-gun troublemakers in Congress have been Jewish, from
the old guard (the infamous Howard Metzenbaum and Co.) to the new breed
(Schumer, Feinstein, Boxer, Lautenberg). Look at who is the most anti-gun
in the halls of Congress, and you will see that a vastly disproportionate
number are Jewish by ethnicity (not just religion).
(JC)
Note: the greeting ["a woman's name"] is the e-mail account
of another family member---I'm a white man. I enjoy your site very much,
however, it isn't true that all gay men want to be part of the "Multicultural
Coalition" that includes minorities with false grievances. It makes me
frustrated that in this country, America, which was founded by white men
for the unlimited (non-violent) personal freedom for white men...that
I should have to wait in line behind a lot of wretched minority leeches
to get my basic civil rights. The gay rights movement has been largely
taken over by lesbians, and is pushing feminism instead of gay rights.
As a gay man, I am concerned to see that a movement which was started
by gay men, is now being run by a bunch of man-hating lesbians and bisexual
women. Lesbians are as dominating as Jewish people are. That bit about
getting rid of Father's and Mother's Day in a Jewish school was sad. The
kids should have just made cards for whichever parent they had.
(B)
I love the name "Jewish Tribal Review." It's has a clever academic ring
to it which at the same time mocks their tribalism. I am having trouble
reading your wonderful book , "When Victums Rule." This is like reading
a book which explains everthing you've ever wanted to know about Judiasm
but were afraid to ask (because you'd be slandered ,smeared and ruined).
About the trouble reading. First, it's difficult to read such a large
type. My browser will only let me reduce the type so much. Also, much
of the formatting has troublesome to the point where it difficult to read.
Thanks.
("Me")
Great Book, excellent site. Thank you for making all the information available.
(Chris)
|
Hezbollah
- Lebanon
Nation of Islam
- U.S.A.
