Introduction
to Revisionist Thought
By Ernst
Zündel
7.
The Revisionist Claim:
Zyklon B was highly toxic. This
being so, it would have been foolish and counterproductive to
endanger Third Reich personnel engaged in allegedly pulling bodies
from the execution chambers shortly after they were
"gassed."
The fraudulent story of the powerful ventilators installed in the
alleged gas chambers, which in reality were morgues, has often been
repeated. Anyone with common sense can visit Auschwitz-Birkenau and
look at the close proximity of the alleged "gas chamber" to the
SS-cafeteria and hospital a few meters across the street. They will
see no powerful exhausts, no screws or nuts, no mounts or anchors for
them, no tall stacks similar to those that exist, for instance, in
the death house gas chamber complex in Parchmont, Mississippi and
other U.S. gas chambers - devices to expel and dispel the deadly
gas.
Furthermore, there are reports - for example, the Hoess "confession"
obtained through bestial torture! - by all kinds of Holocaust
Promotion Lobbyists that the "Sonderkommandos" entered the alleged
gas chambers to remove the dead after only minutes of the "gassings"
- smoking, eating, and drinking! They hardly did that through gas
masks.
Go to Auschwitz. Go to Birkenau. Look at the crematory ovens
allegedly in operation for 24 hours around the clock, right in the
next room to the "gas chamber." Between the two rooms was not even a
door! No provisions for a door are evident.
We have forensic proof, independently verifiable, via the samples and
scrapings taken from these facilities by the much maligned Fred
Leuchter and the German scientist Germar Rudolf, showing no residue
or very little residue of the Zyklon B that, according to the late
Dr. William Lindsey, top ranking research chemist for the giant U.S.
chemical company, Du Pont of America, would still have to be there
attached to the iron in sand, concrete etc. for hundreds if not
thousands of years. (Lindsey, William B. "Zyclon B., Auschwitz and
the Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch," Journal of Historical Review,4, (1983:
261-303.)
The samples taken by the Leuchter procedure wearing rubber gloves and
face masks and dating, identifying and double-bagging these samples
in sterile plastic bags were filmed as a precaution before they were
taken to the USA and analyzed by Alpha Laboratories of Ashland, MA,
by Dr. James Roth, a ten-year veteran professor of Chemistry at
Cornell University. Dr. Roth was accredited as an expert in his field
by the Toronto Court during the 1988 Zündel trial. (Roth
Testimony as summarized in Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the
Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel -
1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp. 362-363)
Check up on Dr. Roth's testimony and then forever hold your
peace.
Introduction to Revisionist Thought
By Ernst
Zündel
Index
Introduction
The Revisionist
claim:
PART I - The Holocaust is
useful postwar propaganda that started as a systematic, insidious
campaign during World War II as one of the tactics employed by
moneyed interests to rally the troops and engage the world,
specifically America, in what turned out to be, essentially, a
fratricidal war.
PART II - There is no proof
that the Holocaust, as depicted by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby and
the highly politicized Hollywood industry, actually occurred.
PART III - The numbers of "Holocaust"
victims are irresponsibly exaggerated.
PART IV - Official state policy
towards the Jews in the Third Reich was emigration, not
extermination.
PART V - Not a single document
has been found with Hitler's signature ordering the extermination of
the Jews.
PART VI - Zyklon B was a
fumigant. It wasn't a practical agent for mass murder.
PART VII - Zyklon B was highly toxic.
This being so, it would have been foolish and counterproductive to
endanger Third Reich personnel engaged in allegedly pulling bodies
from the execution chambers shortly after they were "gassed."
PART VIII - American execution
expert, Fred Leuchter, delivered a scientific break-through in
proving that the so-called gas chambers at Auschwitz could not have
been used for their alleged purpose."
